Topic: SATOSHI = SKYNET (Read 3251 times)
Satoshi Nakamoto is really a mystery. No one has seen or know who he really is. It could even possibly be a robot or an organization rather than an individual. I hope Satoshi comes out to the public one day.
actually this makes sense.
Saw David Hasselhoff and Mark Karpeles on the movie poster and laughed my butt off 
Hats off for the great implementation.
Hats off for the great implementation. 
I saw this video and remembered this thread the other day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61km5RwxQdw
It's not as far fetched as I thought back then. Well it actually is, because the fundamental step for this to happen is still lightyears away, but this is probably the beginning of robotized technology where automation can take better decision making than you about your own expenses. It's pretty mind blowing concept if you study it deeper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61km5RwxQdw
It's not as far fetched as I thought back then. Well it actually is, because the fundamental step for this to happen is still lightyears away, but this is probably the beginning of robotized technology where automation can take better decision making than you about your own expenses. It's pretty mind blowing concept if you study it deeper.
It would be great to see the autonomous robot economy happen. Very cool vid, thanks for sharing.
I saw this video and remembered this thread the other day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61km5RwxQdw
It's not as far fetched as I thought back then. Well it actually is, because the fundamental step for this to happen is still lightyears away, but this is probably the beginning of robotized technology where automation can take better decision making than you about your own expenses. It's pretty mind blowing concept if you study it deeper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61km5RwxQdw
It's not as far fetched as I thought back then. Well it actually is, because the fundamental step for this to happen is still lightyears away, but this is probably the beginning of robotized technology where automation can take better decision making than you about your own expenses. It's pretty mind blowing concept if you study it deeper.
Nice picture. lol. But if electrical impulses can be sent back in time, then I don't think it would need Bitcoin as it would be able to already install itself onto the servers of the world and control the world's finances already.
Great idea though.
Great idea though.
They'd have to get access to the servers hard drives, cpu or ram and cause a electron cascade precisely directed at those atoms of the circuit required... I can imagine they would have to do it millions of times to make sure all the electrons make it to their specified time frame.
If I did it, I would set it up so it gets sent back slowly as the data is verified over the time
, tcp/ip for time travel; It could be a new paradigm in computing.
Nice picture. lol. But if electrical impulses can be sent back in time, then I don't think it would need Bitcoin as it would be able to already install itself onto the servers of the world and control the world's finances already.
Great idea though.
Great idea though.
I don’t really put stock into it, but it’s fun to think in a morbid paranoid kind of way that by purchasing ASIC Miners and hooking them up to the Bitcoin network
I think he was too inspired the terminator movies,but we do not know the future it might be true 
he should have posted this topic a month ago. because i was watching the whole 4 movies back then. it was an awesome week, maybe OP has done the same so he came up with this strange idea.
song looks good if following a view of a program that going to be embed and established into the mechanisms blockchain for being working only from them, he will be inscribed only on the blockchain and running only from it.
That's will be a real incubus !
That's will be a real incubus !
If Satoshi=Skynet, then I want to be a liquid terminator
well,... that would explain why Satoshi replies only every once in a while... time warp. Why would a time traveler bother staying for long periods when they can just jump forward?
Time travel is possible due to Quantum Electro Dynamics:
"The key components of Feynman's presentation of QED are three basic actions.
A photon goes from one place and time to another place and time.
An electron goes from one place and time to another place and time.
An electron emits or absorbs a photon at a certain place and time."
Artificial intelligence is in fact just a set of slide rules: A combination of a database of objects, their connections to each other through subject or association including temporal relations, a basic rule set of problem solving techniques & basic facts... they've tried this approach for a long time, makes good Expert Systems, but still working on True AI that can think for itself. Neural nets, Neuromorphic chips, and other brain inspired hardware is bridgeing the divide but has been insanely hard to work with for decades... the 80s was the golden age of AI until we realized how friggin hard it is to make a thinking machine.
and SkyNET you mean that Swarm AI that powers FinHive?
Time travel is possible due to Quantum Electro Dynamics:
"The key components of Feynman's presentation of QED are three basic actions.
A photon goes from one place and time to another place and time.
An electron goes from one place and time to another place and time.
An electron emits or absorbs a photon at a certain place and time."
Artificial intelligence is in fact just a set of slide rules: A combination of a database of objects, their connections to each other through subject or association including temporal relations, a basic rule set of problem solving techniques & basic facts... they've tried this approach for a long time, makes good Expert Systems, but still working on True AI that can think for itself. Neural nets, Neuromorphic chips, and other brain inspired hardware is bridgeing the divide but has been insanely hard to work with for decades... the 80s was the golden age of AI until we realized how friggin hard it is to make a thinking machine.
and SkyNET you mean that Swarm AI that powers FinHive?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Asimov-centric worldview of future really is not work anymore. This year's annual edge question tells a lot:
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
Computers can't "think". They can only follow programs.
They will never have feelings or consciousness.
Ray Kurzweil (while brilliant in other areas) is wrong.
His idea of 'spiritual machines' is fundamentally flawed
because he doesn't understand the nature of consciousness.
Steve Wozniak, an Apple Computer co-founder, British inventor Clive Sinclair, Bill Gates, Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk all disagree with you. They have all made apocalyptic warnings that in the future artificially intelligent machines will replace the human race.
Steve Wozniak says "If we build these devices to take care of everything for us, eventually they'll think faster than us and they'll get rid of the slow humans to run companies more efficiently."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/24/apple-co-founder-on-artificial-intelligence-the-future-is-scary-and-very-bad-for-people/
i'm not saying AI is impossible... I'm saying computers will never have emotions/real consciousness.
Very nicely put, specially I love the poster lol. I think it would be a great movie that I would watch, but nothing beyond that. There are some things that could very well become true tho, among other things Bitcoin becoming the foundation of the internet of things. If that happens, it would basically mean everyone here holding 1 BTC will be filthy rich. 1 unit of the internet of things = 1%.
Asimov-centric worldview of future really is not work anymore. This year's annual edge question tells a lot:
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
Computers can't "think". They can only follow programs.
They will never have feelings or consciousness.
Ray Kurzweil (while brilliant in other areas) is wrong.
His idea of 'spiritual machines' is fundamentally flawed
because he doesn't understand the nature of consciousness.
Steve Wozniak, an Apple Computer co-founder, British inventor Clive Sinclair, Bill Gates, Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk all disagree with you. They have all made apocalyptic warnings that in the future artificially intelligent machines will replace the human race.
Steve Wozniak says "If we build these devices to take care of everything for us, eventually they'll think faster than us and they'll get rid of the slow humans to run companies more efficiently."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/24/apple-co-founder-on-artificial-intelligence-the-future-is-scary-and-very-bad-for-people/
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Asimov-centric worldview of future really is not work anymore. This year's annual edge question tells a lot:
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
2015 : WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MACHINES THAT THINK?
This is the question of 2015. Read it.
http://edge.org/annual-question/what-do-you-think-about-machines-that-think
Computers can't "think". They can only follow programs.
They will never have feelings or consciousness.
Ray Kurzweil (while brilliant in other areas) is wrong.
His idea of 'spiritual machines' is fundamentally flawed
because he doesn't understand the nature of consciousness.
I think there are very few, 2022 will come soon
Yes, you can say soon if the timeline looks like this:
Now ←-------------- Very Soon -------- Soon -------- Soon-ish(er) ------- Soon-ish --------→ End of Time
Now ←-------------- Very Soon -------- Soon -------- Soon-ish(er) ------- Soon-ish --------→ End of Time
Ha ha ha, good one (saved for future refference) .... the time line is great, because this is how the masses see time.
Also why politic in the western world is so fail. All plans are made the period very soon - soon-ish.
Nobody knows the true identity of Satoshi, but what proves us that Satoshi is human ?
I try to explain with my bad english (sorry for this)
1/ Bitcoin could become the fundation of the Internet of things. Soon, machines will be able to exchange money with no human interaction. With the years, AI will become more and more complex, and one day, machines will gain 2 crucial things :
- independance (it will be able to create / exchange : energy, bitcoins, repairing, protection ...)
- conscience (maybe between 2020 & 2030).
2/ Today, it seems quite hard to imagine to travel in time for something physical. But what about electrical impulses?
What if future could communicate with the past using electrical information to write messages, create code, etc ...?
What if Satoshi is (will be) AI preparing Singularity ?
I try to explain with my bad english (sorry for this)
1/ Bitcoin could become the fundation of the Internet of things. Soon, machines will be able to exchange money with no human interaction. With the years, AI will become more and more complex, and one day, machines will gain 2 crucial things :
- independance (it will be able to create / exchange : energy, bitcoins, repairing, protection ...)
- conscience (maybe between 2020 & 2030).
2/ Today, it seems quite hard to imagine to travel in time for something physical. But what about electrical impulses?
What if future could communicate with the past using electrical information to write messages, create code, etc ...?
What if Satoshi is (will be) AI preparing Singularity ?
- no more different than any automated system that need to be human directed
- in this stage of reasoning, anything can possess a form of true conscience
2/
- not inconceivable, but in perspectives of that is time travel is logically impossible, I prefer save my judgement guided by the motives of the affair
What if the blacks ops have been using time technology to control Bitcoin's future and scam us with gox, asic pre-oders, ponzi's etc? A lot of BFL's staff are shady satanic military types, BA appear to be Jesuits, Zipkin is a Masonic devil worshiper and MK is French.
If this is the case Satoshi should probably remain anonymous or Bitcoin could end up just a schizo memory.
If this is the case Satoshi should probably remain anonymous or Bitcoin could end up just a schizo memory.
Jump to: