Pages:
Author

Topic: Satoshi,BCNext = TPTB_need_war? - page 3. (Read 4156 times)

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 08, 2016, 12:23:40 AM
#50
...because I (and my ancestors, if they were still alive) would run your STD ridden husk of a body out of town.

You will accomplish nothing with that.

In which town are you in the USA? I will come test your threat.

Also please reveal your real name. Otherwise stop talking trash from behind an anonymous username.

I'm not telling you where I live, because I don't want your disgusting, perverted STD riddled body around me.  Get lost loser.

Excuses define your life.

I'm not going to beat up the mentally incapacitated.

You know pricks throw rocks from behind a fence. Real men show their face-to-face.

You are a disgrace to your ancestors who "don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes".

You are not brave at all. And also not very smart.

"Not very smart"?  Who's got the STD?
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 08, 2016, 12:21:11 AM
#49
...because I (and my ancestors, if they were still alive) would run your STD ridden husk of a body out of town.

You will accomplish nothing with that.

In which town are you in the USA? I will come test your threat.

Also please reveal your real name. Otherwise stop talking trash from behind an anonymous username.

I'm not telling you where I live, because I don't want your disgusting, perverted STD riddled body around me.  Get lost loser.

Excuses define your life.

You know pricks throw rocks from behind a fence. Real men show their face-to-face.

You are a disgrace to our BRAVE ancestors who "don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes". Familiarize yourself with the inaccuracy of musket fire during the formative USA wars.

Go cry to moma now.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 08, 2016, 12:19:19 AM
#48
...because I (and my ancestors, if they were still alive) would run your STD ridden husk of a body out of town.

You will accomplish nothing with that.

In which town are you in the USA? I will come test your threat.

Also please reveal your real name. Otherwise stop talking trash from behind an anonymous username.

I'm not telling you where I live, because I don't want your disgusting, perverted STD riddled body around me.  Get lost loser.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 08, 2016, 12:15:24 AM
#47
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 07, 2016, 11:56:56 PM
#46
...shacked up with some moron who has agreed to have sex with you in your poor medical condition (what the heck is she thinking), and you've proceeded to have children with her (I assume maybe incorrectly)

My gf had a horrific peptic ulcer same as I did in May 2012 but she was receiving incorrect medicines and care from the doctors in Pagadian City, so I sent her the correct medicines and coached her through a similar near death experience over the phone even I had never met her in person yet. I had only known her for a month on the internet and few phone conversations. Actually what prompted me to take a great interest in her was I remembered that horrific pain (and I can handle a lot of pain, I've played an entire football game with a severely broken nose for example) that was essentially burning the internal organs due to the stomach acid leaking into the abdominal cavity, i.e. burning alive without pain killers for 3 days nonstop counting the seconds in a delirium and burning tissue pain.

So I helped her out of the goodness of my heart, not expecting anything in return. Because I really know what that pain feels like and I could tell from her Facebook postings that she was in extreme pain.

And no I don't have any kids with her and I specifically told her no kids now because I have no means to support them and I can't give the time because I am working nonstop.

Also I have told her that she is free to leave me if she can find a better man for her and closer to her age.

But we seem to understand, appreciate, and respect each other, so those are some of the important attributes that makes a relationship. We don't share too many intellectual interests, but we both like to dance and sing. She is a much better singer than me though. Also we seem to have similar sense of humor at times. Frankly I don't know how she can tolerate me working all the time, sleeping at all different times of the day and night, and inability to have sex for the past months. But I am working on improving these matters.

You Sir, have no couth. You just proved that you are one of the people that your own ancestors would NOT approve of.

Yes I was promiscuous sometimes in my life [...redacted...]. I was also in monogamous during periods of my life. Btw, I never used recreational drugs in my life, other than alcohol in my teens and early 20s. I don't even drink alcohol any more and I don't even consume any processed sugar nor processed vegetable oils. The only grain I eat now is oatmeal. I probably have much more discipline than you.

I have no idea how my sexual and relationship learning experiences is relevant to my reputation as you are trying to slander it. You've lost all my respect entirely. I now view you as utter and complete trash that should be entirely ignored.

Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (Anti-fragile, resilient) reproduction of the human sexually transmitted diseases and plagues race.

I fixed the above for you because I wasn't sure if you knew about the reprehensible lack of RESPONSIBILITY of the sexual unions as you of Earth have come to practice them, resulting in the murders of the unborn and the USE of another for gratification of human power needs...

Enjoy your pagan Sungod religious delusion.

[...]

I don't want to disrespect your beliefs. Belief systems are a personal matter, because I understand diversity of thought is essential to existence as I explained in my seminal essay "Information Is Alive!":

http://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html#Algorithm_!=_Entropy

First of all, I have come to understand that all religions originated from whorship of the Sun, and you can see that the story of Jesus is just a nearly exact re-enactment of the story of the Sun God Horus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD9f0XU_S78

Horus, Eqypt 3000 B.C.[1]
* Born Dec. 25
* Mother was a virgin
* Star in East
* Adorned by 3 kings
* Teacher at age 12
* Baptized/Ministry at age 30
* 12 disciples

[...]

Btw, I don't advocate some of the shit outcomes that you are assigning to me.
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 505
April 07, 2016, 11:52:01 PM
#45
Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (Anti-fragile, resilient) reproduction of the human sexually transmitted diseases and plagues race.

I fixed the above for you because I wasn't sure if you knew about the reprehensible lack of RESPONSIBILITY of the sexual unions as you of Earth have come to practice them, resulting in the murders of the unborn and the USE of another for gratification of human power needs, and even killing the very body seeking acceptance and pleasure. The real evolutionary shift occurs in consciousness; we are living in the apocalypse because of the imbalances imposed on the planet, so now is the right time to practice responsibility for a change.

The act of marriage and procreation must have the highest degree of pure intent and preparation, for upon these bonds and restrictions will rest the preservation of mankind as a species upon the planet. If everything is done and adhered to, justice and peace will come to all mankind, and life in the human form can be preserved.

The problem was that (throughout "past" history) many young men and soldiers would lustfully spread their fertile seed in the sexual act to MANY various young, willing women whom they met within their daily lives and in their travels from village to village. (Times have not changed much, have they?) The obvious result was that many women became pregnant, and usually by that time the man was long gone, to war or to the next village. So she would be left alone with the responsibility of birthing and raising her child. Many women could not "handle" this unexpected responsibility AND the desertion of who they usually thought to be THEIR man. Many women, overcome by the horror, shame and guilt of the circumstance, killed themselves and their unborn by trying to abort the child. Many women were left on the streets, unless they had friends or family who would take care of them. And many women abandoned their birthed child, sometimes at the doorstep of a church or orphanage, but also some would leave the child to die in some dark and desolate place. So thus the necessity of this law, "You must NOT commit adultery."

It takes a responsible human being to realize that nature's cruelty should not willingly be inflicted on others.

LOVE AND UNION OF EMOTION IS A GIFT OF EXPERIENCE GIVEN UNTO THE SOUL (EMOTIONS) AND HAVE NAUGHT TO DO WITH BODY PHYSICAL. THAT FOR WHICH YE SEARCH IS NOT FULFILLED BY ANY CONJURED ACTIVITY OF THE HUMAN PHYSICAL BEING.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 11:38:47 PM
#44
Weird that you assume that I'm somehow ashamed of my willingness to crowdfund a Jenna Jameson sexbot (but whatever).


No, I didn't assume you were "ashamed" of it.  I don't assume you to be that intelligent of an individual for that one.  I just said that imo, you don't have very good self-esteem.


Anyone with half a brain has figured out that you are only using the moral low-ground argument because you either don't have a technical argument to invalidate Shelby's criticism or you lost the technical argument already and want to shift the ground to save face.

What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.

Here' mine:

DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments. 

An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.

What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency.  Wink

The only reason you don't like my argument is because you don't have a leg to stand on.  You've already lost, and anybody with any common sense knows it.  Shelby doesn't have any real, factual technical criticism of anything either, and anybody with "half a brain" knows it.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

[...]

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android"...

In your rigid world, the only art would be Frank Sinatra. We would all use anti-bacterial soap all the time (and be infected with superbugs). And Linus Torvalds doesn't even deserve recognition in your response. Each of those mentioned above were the best at new genre, e.g. Mike Tyson mastered the combination of power, speed, and efficiency at the heavyweight division and his short arms had a lot to do with it (not only due to the power+speed, but also that he only had to bob his head efficiently to slip punches so he cold stay in close). You don't even appreciate the finer details of analysis and diversity. In short, you appear to be a blind simpleton with an oversized Trump ego.

Btw, apparently bipolar people are statistically more creative.

Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (resilient) reproduction of the human race. And women practice hypergamy and men practice promiscuity, because it is an evolutionary strategy. Religion is apparently another evolutionary strategy, perhaps to countervail the prior instincts, so as to prevent defection from society. This is science. If you don't like it, nature doesn't care. Nature is more complex and diverse than (and ignores/trashes daily) your simpleton rigidness.

Hey, you can call me whatever you want, but I don't degrade myself or others.  "Promiscuous sex" has most likely gotten you where you are today.  Here you are on this forum posting pictures of the aliments of your privates trying to get a diagnosis from total strangers.  My diagnosis is that you've had sex with so many pieces of trash that you've contracted an STD and are losing your mind.  You've run away to the Philippines, shacked up with some moron who has agreed to have sex with you in your poor medical condition (what the heck is she thinking), and you've proceeded to have children with her (I assume maybe incorrectly), which you have no means to support them, have exposed them to your disease, and most likely will leave them fatherless.  Good job genius.  You losers can go be degenerates on someone else's time.  I'm finished with you pieces of white trash.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 07, 2016, 11:20:16 PM
#43
I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

[...]

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android"...

In your rigid world, the only art would be Frank Sinatra. We would all use anti-bacterial soap all the time (and be infected with superbugs). And Linus Torvalds doesn't even deserve recognition in your response. Each of those mentioned above were the best at new genre, e.g. Mike Tyson mastered the combination of power, speed, and efficiency at the heavyweight division and his short arms had a lot to do with it (not only due to the power+speed, but also that he only had to bob his head efficiently to slip punches so he cold stay in close). You don't even appreciate the finer details of analysis and diversity. In short, you appear to be a blind simpleton with an oversized Trump ego.

Btw, apparently bipolar people are statistically more creative.

Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (Anti-fragile, resilient) reproduction of the human race. And women practice hypergamy and men practice promiscuity, because it is an evolutionary strategy. Religion is apparently another evolutionary strategy, perhaps to countervail the prior instincts, so as to prevent defection from society. This is science. If you don't like it, nature doesn't care. Nature is more complex and diverse than (and ignores/trashes daily) your simpleton rigidness.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions.  There's nothing to invalidate.

No I explained the marketing science for why a main aspect of their stated feature set has no use case.

generalizethis, obviously do what you want, but I think it is sufficient to let him have the last post on this matter. For me, our elucidation of this thread is already clear and there is nothing he can say that will change that, other than to apologize.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
April 07, 2016, 10:56:23 PM
#42
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

I'm not recommending that anyone invest in anything.  That's what you do with your Monero posts.  All I'm doing is informing people of an alternative social network platform, which I think will help promote free speech and the general well-being of society.

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android", who is a well-known pornographer, to look 'cool' or 'manly' has some serious self-esteem issues.  You're worse than someone who exposes themselves on the internet, because at least they are doing it to themselves, but you're advocating doing it to women.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions.  There's nothing to invalidate.

I think you're a waste of time, dude. Not sure why you are getting all two bit psychologist on me, but if Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are just opinions, you should be able to show as much--end of story. So do that and stop trying to assassinate people's character with your soap box moralizing. This is a technical forum, not a church.

Hey, I didn't tell Shelby to post a picture of "someone else's" groin (without clarifying that it wasn't his), and I didn't tell you to make that Jenna Jameson comment.  Like it or not, people judge others on their actions.  If you don't want to be judged then, be smart enough to keep quiet.  You know as well as I do that you can't have a discussion with Shelby.  Shelby thinks everything is wrong unless he is doing it.  In Shelby's mind, Shelby is always right one-hundred percent of the time, and nobody is going to change that.

Weird that you assume that I'm somehow ashamed of my willingness to crowdfund a Jenna Jameson sexbot (but whatever).

Anyone with half a brain has figured out that you are only using the moral low-ground argument because you either don't have a technical argument to invalidate Shelby's criticism or you lost the technical argument already and want to shift the ground to save face.

What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.

Here' mine:

DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments. 

An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.

What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 10:15:00 PM
#41
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

I'm not recommending that anyone invest in anything.  That's what you do with your Monero posts.  All I'm doing is informing people of an alternative social network platform, which I think will help promote free speech and the general well-being of society.

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android", who is a well-known pornographer, to look 'cool' or 'manly' has some serious self-esteem issues.  You're worse than someone who exposes themselves on the internet, because at least they are doing it to themselves, but you're advocating doing it to women.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions.  There's nothing to invalidate.

I think you're a waste of time, dude. Not sure why you are getting all two bit psychologist on me, but if Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are just opinions, you should be able to show as much--end of story. So do that and stop trying to assassinate people's character with your soap box moralizing. This is a technical forum, not a church.

Hey, I didn't tell Shelby to post a picture of "someone else's" groin (without clarifying that it wasn't his), and I didn't tell you to make that Jenna Jameson comment.  Like it or not, people judge others on their actions.  If you don't want to be judged then, be smart enough to keep quiet.  You know as well as I do that you can't have a discussion with Shelby.  Shelby thinks everything is wrong unless he is doing it.  In Shelby's mind, Shelby is always right one-hundred percent of the time, and nobody is going to change that.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
April 07, 2016, 10:06:09 PM
#40
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

I'm not recommending that anyone invest in anything.  That's what you do with your Monero posts.  All I'm doing is informing people of an alternative social network platform, which I think will help promote free speech and the general well-being of society.

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android", who is a well-known pornographer, to look 'cool' or 'manly' has some serious self-esteem issues.  You're worse than someone who exposes themselves on the internet, because at least they are doing it to themselves, but you're advocating doing it to women.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions.  There's nothing to invalidate.

I think you're a waste of time, dude. Not sure why you are getting all two bit psychologist on me, but if Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are just opinions, you should be able to show as much--end of story. So do that and stop trying to assassinate people's character with your soap box moralizing. This is a technical forum, not a church.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 09:57:59 PM
#39
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did?  On what grounds are you making that comment?  Drug addiction or thuggery?

I think I've already identified your problem.

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

I'm not recommending that anyone invest in anything.  That's what you do with your Monero posts.  All I'm doing is informing people of an alternative social network platform, which I think will help promote free speech and the general well-being of society.

The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption.  Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android", who is a well-known pornographer, to look 'cool' or 'manly' has some serious self-esteem issues.  You're worse than someone who exposes themselves on the internet, because at least they are doing it to themselves, but you're advocating doing it to women.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions.  There's nothing to invalidate.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
April 07, 2016, 09:07:49 PM
#38
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 03:38:08 PM
#37
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot

Spoetnik the epitome of class.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Well everybody accomplishes something.  Whether it's good or bad is another story.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
April 07, 2016, 08:50:57 AM
#36
You now have a "public image", because you posted your crotch on the world wide web.

I have posted many photos of myself other than example medical photos of a medical ailment on the testicles. And those are not my testicles. I found that image from Google search.

Ok.  I stand corrected.  Still, it's pretty disgusting, and imo, you'd be better off keeping your personal issues off the internet.

Unrealistic.. we are human .

What the problem is... is when someone goes and takes something personal
and then posts it somewhere else solely in an effort to make the person look bad.
AND i look down on the scumbag who does that and not the person who posted personal info.
It is usually done by a Troll / Asshole or idiot for no reason but to be malicious.
These types have no class at all and are often dumb and couldn't win a fight with intelligence.
So that sleazy behavior is all they can do.. they have nothing else.
So when i see people pull shit like that i really just feel sorry for them.

I have had people try and embarrass me before too online and i enjoyed the laugh.
Gimme a break.. i am bullet proof  Cool
Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot (in off-topic)
And how i had to take my pants off naked as cars drove by..
How many little pussies would have the BALLS to do that?
I did what i had to do and i'd do it again and later when i think about it brings a smile to my face ROFL
I shared my story to let people laugh at my expense and i have had guys
come back later and post that i crapped my pants in unrelated places (like in Alt Main)
What?
You don't poop too?
What?
You guys don't have balls too?

I know who has balls around here and i also know who HIDES throwing stones from the shadows like a coward.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 07, 2016, 01:38:35 AM
#35
I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.

What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..

They accomplished nothing.

Edit: see what you did to me, I can't mention Jimi Hendrix without feeling the urge to go watch his YouTube.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 01:28:38 AM
#34
As my family would say, "There are the right type of people, and there aren't."  It has nothing to do with being "racist" or "intolerant".

[...]

Some of us aren't pretending.

[...]

Hey, lol, I didn't say I approved of everybody on those hangouts.

I evaluate people mostly on their productivity, not mostly on their personality.

So agreed, that type of attitude in your family is not compatible with me.

Maybe there is some overlap between certain personality traits and productivity in certain jobs. And when that science is clear to me, I apply it.

For me, it is all about results, not the bullshit noise and pretension.

Those who are blinded with their pretension on personality will miss my train as it leaves the station.

Hopefully that sufficiently explains our differences now. I prefer not to lose more time commenting in this thread.

I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 07, 2016, 01:08:09 AM
#33
As my family would say, "There are the right type of people, and there aren't."  It has nothing to do with being "racist" or "intolerant".

[...]

Some of us aren't pretending.

[...]

Hey, lol, I didn't say I approved of everybody on those hangouts.

I evaluate people mostly on their productivity, not mostly on their personality. I'm fairly open to learning to appreciate the different personalities of people as long as it doesn't interfere with my productivity and interests.

So agreed, that rigid type of attitude in your family is not compatible with me.

Maybe there is some overlap between certain personality traits and productivity in certain jobs. And when that science is clear to me, I apply it.

For me, it is all about results, not the bullshit noise and pretension.

Those who are blinded with their pretension on personality will miss my train as it leaves the station.

Hopefully that sufficiently explains our differences now. I prefer not to lose more time commenting in this thread.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1042
White Male Libertarian Bro
April 07, 2016, 12:57:17 AM
#32
Then I posit yours are rolling in their graves now with your nonsense in this thread.

I'm certain that's not true.  They were hardcore conservatives, and I'm 100% positive yours were too.

You mean I suppose Protestant values. They weren't conservatives w.r.t. disrespecting the rule of the King of England.

Well yes I grew up in the South (yet transferred to California for the final 3 years of high school) and it was much more conservative and even it has modernized, it is still the Bible Belt of conservative morals, yet my birth place New Orleans is also sin city.

In any case, I rejected all that in my youth. I was anti-rascist going against my grandmother's (on father's side) values.

I am definitely not conservative on morals (my multiple parents were extremely liberal and even I rejected their use of MaryJane). I am conservative on fiscal issues and against big government. I actually love the hospitality of Southerners and I also love to do that for visitors. I am overly kind to strangers. I like to sit out on the porch and chitchat. Etc..

We all have our different personalities and I guess we will have to accept that yours and mine are different.

As my family would say, "There are the right type of people, and there aren't."  It has nothing to do with being "racist" or "intolerant".

That's different, and you (should) know it.  You keep your public life professional and your private life private.

I don't follow any archaic rules. I follow what seems to be working and adjust as needed.

You are correct that I totally reject that aspect of American culture.

This concept of a false veneer that we try to pretend we are in public, is to me an anathema to meritocracy.

Some of us aren't pretending.

That doesn't mean I am striving to be unprofessional. To me professionalism is about accomplishments. Professionals accomplish what they say they will. They work hard. The approach their job seriously and with complete dedication.

Hey if you want to see some unprofessional behavior, go watch some Synereo Hangouts.

Hey, lol, I didn't say I approved of everybody on those hangouts.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
April 07, 2016, 12:40:55 AM
#31
Then I posit yours are rolling in their graves now with your nonsense in this thread.

I'm certain that's not true.  They were hardcore conservatives, and I'm 100% positive yours were too.

You mean I suppose Protestant values. They weren't conservatives w.r.t. disrespecting the rule of the King of England or their independence from the North.

Well yes I grew up in the South (yet transferred to California for the final 3 years of high school) and it was much more conservative and even it has modernized, it is still the Bible Belt of conservative morals, yet my birth place New Orleans is also sin city.

In any case, I rejected all that in my youth. I was anti-rascist going against my grandmother's (on father's side) values, and I think she became less rascist in later years as influenced by the change in the attitudes of her grandchildren and children.

I am definitely not conservative on morals (my multiple parents were extremely liberal and even I rejected my mother's use of MaryJane which she hasn't smoked for many decades). I am conservative on fiscal issues and against big government. I actually love the hospitality of Southerners and I also love to do that for visitors. I am overly kind to strangers. I like to sit out on the porch and chitchat. Etc..

We all have our different personalities and I guess we will have to accept that yours and mine are different.

That's different, and you (should) know it.  You keep your public life professional and your private life private.

I don't follow any archaic rules. I follow what seems to be working and adjust as needed.

You are correct that I totally reject that aspect of American culture.

This concept of a false veneer that we try to pretend we are in public, is to me an anathema to meritocracy.

That doesn't mean I am striving to be unprofessional. To me professionalism is about accomplishments. Professionals accomplish what they say they will. They work hard. The approach their job seriously and with complete dedication.

Hey if you want to see some unprofessional behavior, go watch some Synereo Hangouts. Wasting time going off on tangents and wasting time talking about extraneous personal jokes, far off topic anecdotes, etc.. You attacking my posting of a medical condition involving my balls is the epitome of unprofessional nonsense. I have tried to tell now that in my current circumstances, I have been unable to cure this condition over the past several years. And so I am desperate to try to find help on ideas about it. I received a very good idea from rangedriver, which I am experimenting with now.

Another reason I opened up more about my health, was because before there were posters in this forum accusing me of faking an illness. So before I withheld details of my health and was attacked. Then I post more details, and I am attacked.
Pages:
Jump to: