hello! How to make money on the stock exchange Yobit
https://c.radikal.ru/c03/1905/3c/47eb56b5989c.jpg
AltCoin Signals
Coins rise 200%+ or more
80 huge signals
👇👇👇💰👇👇👇💰👇👇👇💰
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEVALFtMzjPl03MeyA
Topic: Satoshi's identity (Read 451 times)
I believe that there are people who know who this Mr. Satoshi is but for obvious reasons they arent coming out.
These people are probably sitting on a small fortune so why take the risk of having to surrender funds or be subjected to criminal charges.
There would be loads of people lining up claiming they were defrauded from Mr. Satoshi.
If I were him then I would be doing the same thing and to stay out of public.
These people are probably sitting on a small fortune so why take the risk of having to surrender funds or be subjected to criminal charges.
There would be loads of people lining up claiming they were defrauded from Mr. Satoshi.
If I were him then I would be doing the same thing and to stay out of public.
Why are you so interested with Satoshi? So finding him will not give you anything, in the conterary will take your time.
On the other hand even if you find who he is, nobody will not believe you.
Right, no one can identify Satoshi Nakamoto so mysterious and you need lot's of time to find him and even you know him now no one can believe you cause many people didn't know who really his and no one can know if it's group of person or not. On the other hand even if you find who he is, nobody will not believe you.
On the one hand, it is interesting to find out who it really is! And on the other hand, what a difference! After all, our revenues, our earnings on stock exchanges are important. Why think about the stars? 
Its best for everyone that we never know. I can imagine the mess it would cause to disclose this...
It might have been made by a single person or a group, as Bitcoin is borrowing on previous ideas, but it had to come in a way that couldn't be hampered or destroyed somehow, and he/she/they made it.
As with any good free open source project, it has carried on without the original author. We should be thankful of the spirit of the free open source software community, that had kept this going on and keep improving it for the future of humanity.
It might have been made by a single person or a group, as Bitcoin is borrowing on previous ideas, but it had to come in a way that couldn't be hampered or destroyed somehow, and he/she/they made it.
As with any good free open source project, it has carried on without the original author. We should be thankful of the spirit of the free open source software community, that had kept this going on and keep improving it for the future of humanity.
Not a chance. Bitcoin.com was first registered in 2000.
Great article.
Bitcoin is just a name that make sense. And it was a great opportunity to register the domain .com. I still think incredible as no one has until today found great evidence about who Satashi was.
Bitcoin is so complicated that it can't be made by one person, I think it's done by a group of people, so I'm not sure he's the person (Heitler Jesse)
Satoshi disowned Bitcoin dot com here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.806 He sounds a bit defensive with the post. as if to say "we didn't copy Bitcoin from the website"
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
Why use an alias in the first place if you do not plan to be anonymous? Some part of him must have always knew it would be a potential option. I find it a more interesting question to consider if he's anonymous for his own good or for the good of bitcoin?
People from the internet are already concerned of privacy long before BItcoin existed and Satoshi is just one. There are more of these people here in the forum today, some are just buying paypal accounts and upwork accounts so they can hide identities. If he really wants to reveal himself he can do it but I'm sure he prefer to stay private and unknown. Leave it that way.
Precisely, it was intended all along. I think at this stage, with years behind us of people trying to figure out Satoshi's true identity the only way it will be revealed is if he or she decides to do so. There's clearly no trail which will conclusively lead to a name. The only proof is a signed address.
Satoshi disowned Bitcoin dot com here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.806 He sounds a bit defensive with the post. as if to say "we didn't copy Bitcoin from the website"
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
Why use an alias in the first place if you do not plan to be anonymous? Some part of him must have always knew it would be a potential option. I find it a more interesting question to consider if he's anonymous for his own good or for the good of bitcoin?
People from the internet are already concerned of privacy long before BItcoin existed and Satoshi is just one. There are more of these people here in the forum today, some are just buying paypal accounts and upwork accounts so they can hide identities. If he really wants to reveal himself he can do it but I'm sure he prefer to stay private and unknown. Leave it that way.
Satoshi disowned Bitcoin dot com here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.806 He sounds a bit defensive with the post. as if to say "we didn't copy Bitcoin from the website"
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
Why use an alias in the first place if you do not plan to be anonymous? Some part of him must have always knew it would be a potential option. I find it a more interesting question to consider if he's anonymous for his own good or for the good of bitcoin?
There are so many theories about who Satoshi Nakamoto really is, and each one is like the truth. I think that if need be he would show his face.
While posterity and curiosity will always ensure, at least in our lifetimes, that Satoshi's identity will be raised every now and then, it's a matter of zero consequence by now. It might have been cause for concern in the early days, I think Bitcoin would never have progressed in the direction it has had the person(s) behind it been revealed. But we've all moved beyond Satoshi to a point that his identity, if ever revealed, or his appearance, would do nothing to affect Bitcoin's direction, either in terms of technological progress or market movement.
Maybe that 1 million or so coins could have an impact, but all negligibly swallowed by the passage of time.
Maybe that 1 million or so coins could have an impact, but all negligibly swallowed by the passage of time.
This is nothing but speculations. The real Satoshi I think will either be some companies or government secret service agent. Anyone can try to claim to be the real Satoshi.
In my opinion, many are curious about the identity of Satoshi, but until now there has been no clarity about who Satoshi really is. Many people who want to know more about Satoshi and want to increase knowledge about bitcoin business to be successful like him.
He did register the company "Bitcoin Ltd" along with 2 other people but in February 2009 (bitcoin.com in Jan 08):
https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
But I find this company is unrelated to the bitcoin itself if it's not owned by satoshi. And based on the thread linked above then it's totally different. https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
I wonder if the purpose of that company is the same with the purpose of the current bitcoin.com as descendants of ver lmao.
Since nobody know who is satoshi yet...
As mentioned in the thread, Heitler describe Bitcoin Ltd's activity on his linkedin profile starting as follow:
"The original concept for bitcoin was to create a more efficient payment system for the web [..]"
I think some of us here are really interested with the true identity of Satoshi but is it really important that we must know the true identity of the creator of Bitcoin? There are some concepts that are invented and yet, the true creator of that concept didn't find any information about him/her. I think what is important now is Satoshi created a digital currency that can change the monetary system of the whole world 
.
. 
He did register the company "Bitcoin Ltd" along with 2 other people but in February 2009 (bitcoin.com in Jan 08):
https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
But I find this company is unrelated to the bitcoin itself if it's not owned by satoshi. And based on the thread linked above then it's totally different. https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
I wonder if the purpose of that company is the same with the purpose of the current bitcoin.com as their descendants with ver lmao.
Satoshi disowned Bitcoin dot com here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.806 He sounds a bit defensive with the post. as if to say "we didn't copy Bitcoin from the website"
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
I have a feeling he didnt plan to be anonymous.
Anything is possible though.
Sometimes his writing looks like that of a well known person who still use this forum
What a load of crap...
And besides, why are you people even looking at the identity of Sathoshi? He used a nickname for a reason and just let him be. Why does it even matter what his real name is?
And besides, why are you people even looking at the identity of Sathoshi? He used a nickname for a reason and just let him be. Why does it even matter what his real name is?
He did register the company "Bitcoin Ltd" along with 2 other people but in February 2009 (bitcoin.com in Jan 08):
https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
https://companycheck.co.uk/company/06831070/BITCOIN-LTD/companies-house-data
Jump to: