Topic: Satoshi's Vision: What would Satoshi do? (Read 875 times)
Do not talk too much about satoshi chances are he is calm up there and do not want his self in sebut2 again we just have to shave because he has made us bitcoin and can enjoy it
Why is that so important who is the Satoshi or what does he do? Even the Arnold Shwarzeneger is laughing from that kind of a thinking in his: "Who is your daddy, and what da(does) he do" meme.
That is some kind of a stupid belief that the USA have of the founding fathers. Why that is even remotely important outside of making a cult and idolatry of people?
The concept if bitcoin is ok. Why creating a myth to that? People need to think criticaly outside of an american model of schools.
Guys.... just because of a school that had put a really dumb ideas into your head, does not mean that you should have those really dumb ideas all your lifes. THINK!! ok?
That is some kind of a stupid belief that the USA have of the founding fathers. Why that is even remotely important outside of making a cult and idolatry of people?
The concept if bitcoin is ok. Why creating a myth to that? People need to think criticaly outside of an american model of schools.
Guys.... just because of a school that had put a really dumb ideas into your head, does not mean that you should have those really dumb ideas all your lifes. THINK!! ok?
here goes the signature ...
Verified. Looks good to me. He's obviously satoshi so let's all blindly follow what he wants to do and never question him again.
He Doesn't Really prove anything, yeah probably you are just trolling with him on being really Satoshi, this will keep on going and going until a petition from activating what segwit wants to surely stop, and I think that many people right now are seeing what Segwit really wants to do and that is in innovating bitcoin more! and we can see from the price of bitcoin that the hard fort really in working.
Craig Wright is not satoshi. This shows the lengths he went to to trick everyone without providing a valid signature.
If satoshi had actually lost his keys (unlikely) he would have said that he lost his keys and explain why, then work on alternative proof. Craig Wright is a manipulative liar.
You can't rely on your thoughts to prove that someone who caused the media and public so much confusion could actually be satoshi.
If satoshi had actually lost his keys (unlikely) he would have said that he lost his keys and explain why, then work on alternative proof. Craig Wright is a manipulative liar.
You can't rely on your thoughts to prove that someone who caused the media and public so much confusion could actually be satoshi.
Lol if you think nobody supports BCC then you need to take a good hard look around.
I don't expect BCC to get more than, say, Litecoin's level of support. Especially in the short term. 
There is no use going back and try to think what he would do today. Satoshi or the "Satoshi persona" is dead. Bitcoin is in the hands of the Core developers now or whoever ends up being the new stewards of the network after August.
I've been reading these kind of articles like " who is Satoshi or what would he do today or if you are Satoshi " of course people are living in the fantasy that satoshincreated and the ultimate treasure he left is the block chain technology and it's capabilities to change the way of network, data's, and currencies.
What's coming in the next few years is out of his hands and he can't do nothing to stop it, we've been in a good run in these past few years and I think it's time to forget this " Satoshi thing" unless he has some way to destroy and break the block chain technology the he will turn the world upside down again in his come back but that is unlikely to happen. Let's just bear in our hearts that yes he's the great introductory character in these cryptocurrencies world but the way he can do now is out of he's and our league.
These are the reasons he believes Craig Wright started the bitcoin network?
"One: Because he is not lying when he speaks. You can tell he is an honest man because he speaks with raw, real emotion. Lying and deceit is not something this man is good at. He says what he thinks, and his answers are brutally honest whether you like them or not. When you watch him in videos, you can tell he is speaking from the heart. He is not BSing.
Two: His degree of knowledge is at Satoshi level. He has a level of knowledge regarding all of the main aspects of Bitcoin — the security, the economics, the mathematics, and the overall system itself — that is second to none. I always thought Andreas Antonopolous knew Bitcoin best, but I’ve had to reconsider after listening to him.
Three: Craig Wright’s vision matches Satoshi’s vision. Satoshi would NOT have wanted to scale off-chain using sidechains. He would have wanted to scale Bitcoin to VISA+ levels, on-chain."
GTFOOH! I guess critical thinking skills aren't taught in college anymore?
"One: Because he is not lying when he speaks. You can tell he is an honest man because he speaks with raw, real emotion. Lying and deceit is not something this man is good at. He says what he thinks, and his answers are brutally honest whether you like them or not. When you watch him in videos, you can tell he is speaking from the heart. He is not BSing.
Two: His degree of knowledge is at Satoshi level. He has a level of knowledge regarding all of the main aspects of Bitcoin — the security, the economics, the mathematics, and the overall system itself — that is second to none. I always thought Andreas Antonopolous knew Bitcoin best, but I’ve had to reconsider after listening to him.
Three: Craig Wright’s vision matches Satoshi’s vision. Satoshi would NOT have wanted to scale off-chain using sidechains. He would have wanted to scale Bitcoin to VISA+ levels, on-chain."
GTFOOH! I guess critical thinking skills aren't taught in college anymore?
no he won't, in fact nobody does.
not because of what it is, not because of code, not because of people behind it,... BUT because it is defeating the whole purpose of bitcoin. to be decentralized, to reach a consensus, to not split the chain with a very small minority support.
Lol if you think nobody supports BCC then you need to take a good hard look around.
yeah sure if you go to bitmain's office, or if you do a threeway with Jihan Wu and Craig Scammer Wright at night everyone in that room in the dark will support BCC. i have no doubt about it
Hope you hold on tight to your BitcoinCash
no he won't, in fact nobody does.
not because of what it is, not because of code, not because of people behind it,... BUT because it is defeating the whole purpose of bitcoin. to be decentralized, to reach a consensus, to not split the chain with a very small minority support.
Lol if you think nobody supports BCC then you need to take a good hard look around.
yeah sure if you go to bitmain's office, or if you do a threeway with Jihan Wu and Craig Scammer Wright at night everyone in that room in the dark will support BCC. i have no doubt about it
There is no use going back and try to think what he would do today. Satoshi or the "Satoshi persona" is dead. Bitcoin is in the hands of the Core developers now or whoever ends up being the new stewards of the network after August.
no he won't, in fact nobody does.
not because of what it is, not because of code, not because of people behind it,... BUT because it is defeating the whole purpose of bitcoin. to be decentralized, to reach a consensus, to not split the chain with a very small minority support.
Lol if you think nobody supports BCC then you need to take a good hard look around.
here goes the signature ...
Verified. Looks good to me. He's obviously satoshi so let's all blindly follow what he wants to do and never question him again.
no he won't, in fact nobody does.
not because of what it is, not because of code, not because of people behind it,... BUT because it is defeating the whole purpose of bitcoin. to be decentralized, to reach a consensus, to not split the chain with a very small minority support.
If satoshi nokomata still lives, he does not support any kind of hard fork or split. He would advocate the integrity of whole blockchain and bitcoin without dividing into sub groups. That's my thought.
For the article shared, it's really hard to understand the main point of view.
The more time passes since 2008, when the world learned about the appearance of the digital currency, the less chance it will be that Satoshi Nakamoto will ever be announced and, anyway, will be identified in some way. Therefore, I believe that this mysterious person, who created the world of crypto currency, will remain legendary, as already the most incredible rumors go about Satoshi.
Everybody wants to hear from Satoshi. But is he really the wise and powerful wizard we make him out to be? He made something really amazing, but that doesn't mean every choice he's ever made has been a good one. If he came back and advocated for this BIP or that chain, we can't be certain that he'll be making the absolute right choice.
it really doesn't matter how many times you repeat the same script of calling "CW=Satoshi" and then call his bullshit as "Satoshi's vision", in the end we are getting SegWit and CW and his shills can bite the dust.
even if you fill the whole internet with this script, we -the bitcoin community- will not forget his scam.
even if you fill the whole internet with this script, we -the bitcoin community- will not forget his scam.
Maybe there should be a rule no more post regarding satoshi's belief, or who he is, every dam week /month a newbie will come and post this kind of links, again a huge debate shall brawl up and at the end conclusion is that person is not satoshi. Op why don't you read here before posting article that is going to make no sense and it won't lead to a conclusion, why can't you simply Google it or browse similar threads. It's about time such threads be banned or boycotted for good.
Craig Wright is Satoshi
here goes the signature ...
Never to split blockchain, or actually sign a message with a damn address to prove he is really Satoshi?
This is bullshit mate, when someone wants to know who's the daddy the first thing is a DNA test, in this
Case the only way is signing a message, you want to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi? sign a message that's
All, how'd you tell a fucking moron if you are Satoshi you need to sign a message, stop this nonsense you
Click baiting us to read someone sucking Wu's dick and believes someone is Satoshi? sign a message, if
He really knows everything about Bitcoin then he should know without a signed message no one gives a
Shit if he is really Satoshi.
This is bullshit mate, when someone wants to know who's the daddy the first thing is a DNA test, in this
Case the only way is signing a message, you want to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi? sign a message that's
All, how'd you tell a fucking moron if you are Satoshi you need to sign a message, stop this nonsense you
Click baiting us to read someone sucking Wu's dick and believes someone is Satoshi? sign a message, if
He really knows everything about Bitcoin then he should know without a signed message no one gives a
Shit if he is really Satoshi.
here goes the signature ...
Never to split blockchain, or actually sign a message with a damn address to prove he is really Satoshi?
This is bullshit mate, when someone wants to know who's the daddy the first thing is a DNA test, in this
Case the only way is signing a message, you want to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi? sign a message that's
All, how'd you tell a fucking moron if you are Satoshi you need to sign a message, stop this nonsense you
Click baiting us to read someone sucking Wu's dick and believes someone is Satoshi? sign a message, if
He really knows everything about Bitcoin then he should know without a signed message no one gives a
Shit if he is really Satoshi.
This is bullshit mate, when someone wants to know who's the daddy the first thing is a DNA test, in this
Case the only way is signing a message, you want to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi? sign a message that's
All, how'd you tell a fucking moron if you are Satoshi you need to sign a message, stop this nonsense you
Click baiting us to read someone sucking Wu's dick and believes someone is Satoshi? sign a message, if
He really knows everything about Bitcoin then he should know without a signed message no one gives a
Shit if he is really Satoshi.
Jump to: