Shit How much time do I have left to dump before Craiggy boy destroys bitcoin?
Eternity.
Topic: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper - page 31. (Read 25829 times)
January 03, 2020, 03:56:56 AM
Eternity.
January 03, 2020, 02:05:44 AM
Shit How much time do I have left to dump before Craiggy boy destroys bitcoin?
January 02, 2020, 04:45:51 PM
WTF did just happen?
I possess a JJG star of valor, but this is beyond outrageous.
I possess a JJG star of valor, but this is beyond outrageous.
January 02, 2020, 06:56:59 AM
Great, so:
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
If you type "bonded courier" into Twitter, some pretty amazing results show up.
"Are you Marty McFly?"
"No, I'm Satoshi Nakamoto. Is that my bitcoins? Sweet. Thanks Doc!"
Romans 1:21-22 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools . . .
Six Days (Remix)
- https://youtu.be/5JhKWFxLhKo
...
Arthur Van Pelt - The Orange Suit Sessions Bitcoin Future 2020
- https://youtu.be/Z2tevzTCAbE?t=2502
"He's a martyr. He's a savior. He's the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. He's a time traveler. He's an oracle. He's a prophet, a god, a king, an emperor, a hero, a superman...
Done? Yeah.
No, he's a FRAUD. Get out of that cult while you can, sir."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1206953658748997633
...
Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
Genesis 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Genesis 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
...
More not *Satire* ...
_ _
((___))
[ x x ]
\ /
(' ')
(U)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_the_Dead_Cow
...
Actual *Satire* ...
"EXCLUSIVE
A picture of a street scenery, snapshotted yesterday in Cobham, UK has reached me.
AMA starts now."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1212732536897626116
"Cattle is a noun with neither a singular nor a plural form. It’s a schrodinger’s noun.
You’re welcome.
— Palley"
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1209907541884452864
"Fun fact — the word “troll” derives from the Old Nestorian word for love."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1212449204322353154
...
"... “I was promised a bonded courier.” ..."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1212793181630279680
"maybe wright meant a bondage courier"
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1210962268575416321
"sorry sorry this is a family twitter feed but you know words are funny what can I say"
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1210962367024173056
"a bondage courier would make marginally more sense than a bonded courier though and that says a lot about making sense"
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1210962909729304581
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1208665506137411584
...
"a flurry of activity in the kleiman v. wright case in early January (depositions) but still no bondage courier.
(this is from a discovery dispute motion of which there see to be a never ending stream in this case)."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1212378631479218177
...
"William Nicholson
https://www.seakexperts.com/members/8953-william-r-nicholson …
F Harley Norwitch
https://www.questioneddocuments.com/
Dr. Macintyre - infectious disease expert
https://doctor.webmd.com/doctor/dugald-macintyre-jr-f8f5c977-5521-4155-8945-e0c087f555e5-overview …"
- https://twitter.com/DustinDry1st/status/1212396958410821632
...
"The bondage courier sends his apologies, he’s ‘tied up’"
- https://twitter.com/longandy/status/1212389734556819456
"@stephendpalley any idea what role Uyen T Nguyen had in all this?, And where she is now and why she hasn't been called to court?. Surely a key witness?"
- https://twitter.com/johneakin84/status/1212384504830218241
"Nobody can find her. There is another doc from the case where the plaintiffs and the defense state that can't find her for dep."
- https://twitter.com/Johnnys_cryptos/status/1212429191205064708
...
Erm, a case in point, perhaps ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52412739
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52413397
January 02, 2020, 03:59:56 AM
I just downloaded the latest CourtListener entry. Looks like Kleiman wants to nail Craig on purgery:
Quote
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
1. Admit Ira never told You he would release any claim against You in exchange for CoinExch shares.
2. Admit Ira never told You W&K Info Defense Research LLC would release any claim it had against You in exchange for Coin-Exch shares.
3. Admit the Estate of Dave Kleiman was not, in any capacity, a party in any proceeding You were involved in before the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
4. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
5. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
6. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v. W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
7. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
8. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
9. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
10. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
11. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
12. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
13. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
14. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
15. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
16. Admit that You were never appointed “Director / Authorized Agent” of Defendant W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
17. Admit that Jamie Wilson was not an “authorized officer” of W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
18. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
19. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
20. Admit that You cannot access the [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected] email accounts.
21. Admit that you mined bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
22. Admit that you mined at least 100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
23. Admit that you mined at least 200,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
24. Admit that you mined at least 300,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
25. Admit that you mined at least 400,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
26. Admit that you mined at least 500,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
27. Admit that you mined at least 600,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
28. Admit that you mined at least 700,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
29. Admit that you mined at least 800,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
30. Admit that you mined at least 821,050 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013
31. Admit that you mined at least 900,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
32. Admit that you mined at least 1,000,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
33. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
34. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
35. Admit you mined more than 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
36. Admit that at least 821,050 bitcoins you mined before April 26, 2013 remain unspent.
37. Admit that at least 100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
38. Admit that at least 200,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
39. Admit that at least 300,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
40. Admit that at least 400,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
41. Admit that at least 500,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
42. Admit that at least 600,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
43. Admit that at least 700,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
44. Admit that at least 800,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
45. Admit that at least 900,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
46. Admit that at least 1,000,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
47. Admit that at least 1,100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
48. Admit that at least 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
49. Admit that more than 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
50. Admit that bitcoin wallets are identifiable.
51. Admit that bitcoin public addresses are identifiable.
52. Admit that you developed intellectual property prior to April 26, 2013.
53. Admit that you developed intellectual property related to bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
54. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your partner.
55. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your best friend.
56. Admit Dave Kleiman trusted you.
57. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman the private keys to any bitcoin public keys.
58. Admit you never had an interest in any bitcoin belonging to Dave Kleiman.
59. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop intellectual property.
60. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop blockchain intellectual property.
61. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop Bitcoin.
62. Admit you never had any interest in bitcoin Dave Kleiman mined.
63. Admit that Dave Kleiman never agreed to give you any of the bitcoin he mined.
64. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman any private keys, in a format plainly accessible to him in their entirety, that correspond to any of the public keys in the coinbase transaction outputs from the blocks you mined.
1. Admit Ira never told You he would release any claim against You in exchange for CoinExch shares.
2. Admit Ira never told You W&K Info Defense Research LLC would release any claim it had against You in exchange for Coin-Exch shares.
3. Admit the Estate of Dave Kleiman was not, in any capacity, a party in any proceeding You were involved in before the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
4. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
5. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
6. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v. W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
7. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
8. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
9. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
10. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
11. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
12. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
13. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
14. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
15. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
16. Admit that You were never appointed “Director / Authorized Agent” of Defendant W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
17. Admit that Jamie Wilson was not an “authorized officer” of W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
18. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
19. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
20. Admit that You cannot access the [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected] email accounts.
21. Admit that you mined bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
22. Admit that you mined at least 100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
23. Admit that you mined at least 200,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
24. Admit that you mined at least 300,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
25. Admit that you mined at least 400,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
26. Admit that you mined at least 500,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
27. Admit that you mined at least 600,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
28. Admit that you mined at least 700,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
29. Admit that you mined at least 800,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
30. Admit that you mined at least 821,050 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013
31. Admit that you mined at least 900,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
32. Admit that you mined at least 1,000,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
33. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
34. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
35. Admit you mined more than 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
36. Admit that at least 821,050 bitcoins you mined before April 26, 2013 remain unspent.
37. Admit that at least 100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
38. Admit that at least 200,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
39. Admit that at least 300,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
40. Admit that at least 400,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
41. Admit that at least 500,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
42. Admit that at least 600,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
43. Admit that at least 700,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
44. Admit that at least 800,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
45. Admit that at least 900,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
46. Admit that at least 1,000,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
47. Admit that at least 1,100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
48. Admit that at least 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
49. Admit that more than 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
50. Admit that bitcoin wallets are identifiable.
51. Admit that bitcoin public addresses are identifiable.
52. Admit that you developed intellectual property prior to April 26, 2013.
53. Admit that you developed intellectual property related to bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
54. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your partner.
55. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your best friend.
56. Admit Dave Kleiman trusted you.
57. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman the private keys to any bitcoin public keys.
58. Admit you never had an interest in any bitcoin belonging to Dave Kleiman.
59. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop intellectual property.
60. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop blockchain intellectual property.
61. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop Bitcoin.
62. Admit you never had any interest in bitcoin Dave Kleiman mined.
63. Admit that Dave Kleiman never agreed to give you any of the bitcoin he mined.
64. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman any private keys, in a format plainly accessible to him in their entirety, that correspond to any of the public keys in the coinbase transaction outputs from the blocks you mined.
January 01, 2020, 02:07:41 PM
If BCH still has Bitmain's favours, it stands a chance. Bitmain will be served early by TMSC for the 5nm node, so a new gen of ASICs will come in 2020. Should be H2 though.
Without Bitmain support, BCH is in deep waters.
For BSV, around the halving we'll already have had a lot more fun from the Kleiman case + the McCormack trial for libel (schedulded for april), which will get more bad PR for BSV, because they really suck at damage control. Everytime faketoshi runs his big mouth, it's more evidence piling against him.
BSV is starting to lose long time supporters whether it's twitter or reddit.
Calvin boy will indeed bleed more money.
Karma.
Without Bitmain support, BCH is in deep waters.
For BSV, around the halving we'll already have had a lot more fun from the Kleiman case + the McCormack trial for libel (schedulded for april), which will get more bad PR for BSV, because they really suck at damage control. Everytime faketoshi runs his big mouth, it's more evidence piling against him.
BSV is starting to lose long time supporters whether it's twitter or reddit.
Calvin boy will indeed bleed more money.
Karma.
Well, doesn't it seem that Bitmain's hand is kind of forced in terms of their bcash (referring to the ABC version rather than the SV version) support. Of course, they could write the whole thing off, but they leveraged pretty damned deeply into that badboy, and surely there are some questions regarding either where it is going to lead them, in terms of ongoing bag holding.. and/or if they can continue to sustain it. Surely there could be some insider ways that investors like Calvin can keep profitable with SV, but seems like a BIG ASS stretch... and jeez, could it also be possible that fraudster pumpkin farmer could end up in jail before such April trial? Maybe I am engaged in too much wishful thinking regarding a possible "prevailing of justice" but I doubt that courts are very tolerant to the ongoing shenanigans of being lied to in court proceedings... even when some of the proceedings might be behind the scenes and apparent settlement efforts.
January 01, 2020, 01:54:10 PM
If BCH still has Bitmain's favours, it stands a chance. Bitmain will be served early by TMSC for the 5nm node, so a new gen of ASICs will come in 2020. Should be H2 though.
Without Bitmain support, BCH is in deep waters.
For BSV, around the halving we'll already have had a lot more fun from the Kleiman case + the McCormack trial for libel (schedulded for april), which will get more bad PR for BSV, because they really suck at damage control. Everytime faketoshi runs his big mouth, it's more evidence piling against him.
BSV is starting to lose long time supporters whether it's twitter or reddit.
Calvin boy will indeed bleed more money.
Karma.
Without Bitmain support, BCH is in deep waters.
For BSV, around the halving we'll already have had a lot more fun from the Kleiman case + the McCormack trial for libel (schedulded for april), which will get more bad PR for BSV, because they really suck at damage control. Everytime faketoshi runs his big mouth, it's more evidence piling against him.
BSV is starting to lose long time supporters whether it's twitter or reddit.
Calvin boy will indeed bleed more money.
Karma.
January 01, 2020, 10:53:41 AM
In 2020, BSV (and BCH too) are going very butt hurt...
BSV is probably in a better position. It only has one miner - our favourite chicken fiddler - who'll stick at it no matter what while it fits his plans.
He clearly doesn't give a fuck about how much it costs him to keep it alive and a reduction in block reward won't matter. And I doubt on chain fees have ever crossed his perverted mind, not that there are any.
I'll guess he's waiting for a generalised alt pump to offload. If that doesn't materialise in the next couple of years then we can talk death.
BCH is rather more up in the air as I presume there's a bit more pragmatism from the people who mine it.
January 01, 2020, 10:13:50 AM
Anyone know whether our special friend operates on Australian time no matter where he is?
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
Ney, he lives in London, not midnight yet.
Won't change the outcome anyways.
Hahahahaha
Yeah, that fucktwat australian pumpkin farmer will do whatever he can in his own interest in order to spin matters, and you gotta be pretty fucking dumb to either have believed that he had the capability of moving anything close to a million coins (even close to 100k coins would be amazing for some dweeb like that to accomplish), and so yeah, no matter how the twit spins the matter and give him all kinds of benefits of the doubt, we are going to be witnessing excuses and putting things off or changing goals or reframing the situation rather than anything meaningfully close to his having any real physical access to accomplishing the moving/controlling coins objectives that he had proclaimed to have had.
More evidence of a fraud, and surprising that any stupid follower of his does not catch on at some point, and funny his fraud coin has not gone to zero, too... his coin seems to be holding value pretty decently given all of the ongoing ridiculousness of the whole thing.
January 01, 2020, 04:29:36 AM
In 2020, BSV (and BCH too) are going very butt hurt...
#BCH and #BSV have played a dumb game to produce blocks faster than the average 10mn time, toying with the difficuty adjustment algorithm.
They are one month ahead of #BTC for their halving. Prepare yourself to see their hashrate crumble and may be chain stuck after the halving.
While #bitcoin will still produce a block reward of 12.5 BTC / block until its halving, #BSV (#bitcoinSV from #faketoshi) and #BCH will give a tiny 6.25 coin reward per block, with a much lower demand.
Miners will have to massively leave their chain to mine BTC for better rewards
Its not their Tx fees than can reverse this situation.
BCH and BSV have indeed produced +/- 1000 more blocks than Bitcoin although they should all be at around the same height ( around 610750 for BTC).
Hold your beers...
#BCH and #BSV have played a dumb game to produce blocks faster than the average 10mn time, toying with the difficuty adjustment algorithm.
They are one month ahead of #BTC for their halving. Prepare yourself to see their hashrate crumble and may be chain stuck after the halving.
While #bitcoin will still produce a block reward of 12.5 BTC / block until its halving, #BSV (#bitcoinSV from #faketoshi) and #BCH will give a tiny 6.25 coin reward per block, with a much lower demand.
Miners will have to massively leave their chain to mine BTC for better rewards
Its not their Tx fees than can reverse this situation.
BCH and BSV have indeed produced +/- 1000 more blocks than Bitcoin although they should all be at around the same height ( around 610750 for BTC).
Hold your beers...
January 01, 2020, 04:23:39 AM
Great, so:
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
If you type "bonded courier" into Twitter, some pretty amazing results show up.
"Are you Marty McFly?"
"No, I'm Satoshi Nakamoto. Is that my bitcoins? Sweet. Thanks Doc!"
January 01, 2020, 03:45:30 AM
Great, so:
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
1. Bitcoin did not 'die' due to a fatal SegWit flaw he would reveal, as he predicted in Nov 2018.
2. There is no bonded courier.
December 31, 2019, 01:50:33 PM
Anyone know whether our special friend operates on Australian time no matter where he is?
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
Ney, he lives in London, not midnight yet.
Won't change the outcome anyways.
December 31, 2019, 10:37:23 AM
Anyone know whether our special friend operates on Australian time no matter where he is?
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
It's 2020 in Sydney now. That means he should've revealed bitcoin's 'fatal flaw' by now and he might already be giving the 'bonded courier' a cuppa after such a long journey.
So bitcoin should already not exist, and he should be dumping 1 million non existent coins any second.
Oh and monero and zcash should be broken too.
Busy 24 hours for him.
December 30, 2019, 06:28:22 PM
I love how Craig/Coingeek already started damage control.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
Quote
As I’ve explained in court proceedings, I believe I will receive information in January 2020 that will enable us to identify coins I mined into my companies in 2009 and 2010, but cannot be certain that all of that information will in fact arrive. I have not said the private keys to those coins would become available, or if so, actually used, in January 2020. In the next few weeks, we will be holding trust meetings and working out the next steps going forward in 2020.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
Or is culpable or has an agenda.
December 30, 2019, 01:37:00 PM
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
Imperial or Metric? I mean, is it Celsius or Fahrenheit? I think Australians use Celsius, so 78 F is 25 C. December 29, 2019, 11:05:58 AM
I love how Craig/Coingeek already started damage control.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
Quote
As I’ve explained in court proceedings, I believe I will receive information in January 2020 that will enable us to identify coins I mined into my companies in 2009 and 2010, but cannot be certain that all of that information will in fact arrive. I have not said the private keys to those coins would become available, or if so, actually used, in January 2020. In the next few weeks, we will be holding trust meetings and working out the next steps going forward in 2020.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
You're harsh on air conditionning systems.
December 29, 2019, 04:20:48 AM
I love how Craig/Coingeek already started damage control.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
Quote
As I’ve explained in court proceedings, I believe I will receive information in January 2020 that will enable us to identify coins I mined into my companies in 2009 and 2010, but cannot be certain that all of that information will in fact arrive. I have not said the private keys to those coins would become available, or if so, actually used, in January 2020. In the next few weeks, we will be holding trust meetings and working out the next steps going forward in 2020.
Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.
December 28, 2019, 07:43:14 AM
He's being called out by Satoshilite.
BTW, my posts recently deletedin the BSV thread:
Imagine if one day all PoW operating resources will go to BSV. Did you know that you can already store several Terabytes in a micro-SD in 2019.
It's more likely to go on a weekend trip on the moons of Jupiter than having all of POW (I hope you mean SHA256 ASICs, otherwise it's worse than I think) dedicated to BSV.
BTW, my posts recently deletedin the BSV thread:
Imagine if one day all PoW operating resources will go to BSV. Did you know that you can already store several Terabytes in a micro-SD in 2019.
It's more likely to go on a weekend trip on the moons of Jupiter than having all of POW (I hope you mean SHA256 ASICs, otherwise it's worse than I think) dedicated to BSV.
Yeah, ask Kevin Pham
Pedo sv, remember ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47130268
"Child abuse images hidden in crypto-currency blockchain
Images of child sexual abuse have been found embedded in the system powering a high-profile crypto-currency.
Somebody added the illegal images to the core ledger of Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) by using a payment processor."
It is just a matter of time until all of BTC is uploaded to the BitCoin blockchain
Scaling, who can and who cant, without it, bye bye
Scaling, who can and who cant, without it, bye bye
Tell me when BSV moves 1 billion dollars in a single block.
"peer to peer electronic cash system".
Nobody is forcing you to use Segwit by the way
Suuuurrrre.
People changed the bitcoin protocol.... other people didn't adopt those protocol alterations (segwit and opdsv). It's quite simple.
Nobody is forcing you to use a Bech32 adress, you can use a Legacy adress.
https://medium.com/@buddhasource/bitcoin-legacy-vs-segwit-wallet-address-what-is-the-difference-cb2e71ab8381
Nobody is forcing u to use a coin that runs on up to 3 different histories, has nothing to do with BitCOin any more - but has ticker BTC
Use something much more transparent and scalable
Closed source development is not transparent.
Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0
Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?
In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)
Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...
LMAO.
0 conf shitcoin is anything but Bitcoin.
Closed source dev is anything but Bitcoin.
The face of the project calling for the possibility to "reverse or undo" Tx is anything but Bitcoin.
.. the only closed thing here seems to be ur own washed mind
BSV is fully about opencompetition - if you cannot read / understand simple Bitcoin code - u cannot compete.
try harder
Read the WP again.
Read Satoshi posts another time.
Some stuff about avoiding double spending.
Then try to troll again.
That's all folks.
