Topic: [SCAM] Blocknet - page 8. (Read 11102 times)

while i tend to agree with you about spotniek - I don't really think somebody selling an exchange between a bunch of $20,000 - $50,000 market cap coins for $1,000,000 after slapping the label "internet of blockchains" on it is all that promising.  they can't even get their group chat, linux / mac releases shit together.

I've been at times amused by Spoetnik's posting. But I'm done. This guy is on some heavy drugs, or partially insane.

Spoetnik, you've been attacking the coins with the most promising/positive futures; XMR(Monero) and others. Yet, you support blatant shitcoins themselves like Maxcoin. I know you're only doing this because you're desperate and want your past, failed investments to rise(Maxcoin and others), but attacking good coins is not the way to go. You're the lone man out attacking every altcoin out there instead of picking your ass up and making some money by trading, which again makes me question your sanity.

Most people in this thread haven't even made $1,000 from trading altcoins. Yet they go around attacking every new feature on coins, calling them scams immediately. What a sad bunch.

u write like someone who gets paid 5 cents a post 

thanks Spoetnik for posting this... My SCAM Blocknet Thread was deleted (maybe wrong section though.. didnt check)

anyhow: good that this gets some attention now

I'm not full of the jealousy but the anger at these nasty people trolling and fudding good people like Dan and his blocknet. Disgusting trolls. 

Who me? No Im just a lowly trader but I am just amazed by the actions of people. Its crazy. Crypto is starting to be no fun because of it. How many other people feel like this? We should all be helping each other and helping other coins and devs. Why knock them down like this. They want to create something new. By all means do it. Its like a bunch of jealous girls.

how do you know? perhaps you even keep a diary of all of the elaborate scams you guys have done in the past?

I cannot believe the same people fudding swift are the same people fudding blocknet.

i cannot believe how its the same people from bitswift defending blocknet. but no one else. just newbies. no developera. no technical talk.
btw spoetnik thanks

caveat emptor mothafuckas.... 

Jimmy Zed, swift is right back where it left off just like that. Are you crying now? LMAO

How many btc did you spend to dump it like that? OUCH

It already requires a Certain audacity to declare a project as a fraud with a reputation like you have. Nice try sir...
http://i.imgur.com/cbPTHCn.png?1

Spoetnik in full effect.

Nothing gets past this guy.  Lol

Bravo, brother!

Instead of having 1,000 threads all over the place calling scams for whatever reason, since its subjective in nature, maybe one thread of coins that are not being declared scams?

XC has continued to stay relevant for longer than most. Cloak gone already, Shadow is on its way. A year from now XC will still be kicking and innovating and your coins will be a forgotten memory.

Why do all these coin communities ask for Dans assistance in getting bugs worked out and audits? Has anyone asked you for any help like that?

Lol NOPE!  I'm a true altcoin observer.  I own two coins in the top 10 that are in no way competing with XC.  Just hate that these clowns are still sucking people dry.

Whats on your resume? Sham cloak and Shadow? Come on get real with yourself.

Dude - no he hasn't.  He paid another developer to launch XC.  He brought some really really old development experience into the game and has been pushing a closed sourced codebase with his two full time marketing people.

What ... exactly do you think he's done for cryptocurrency?

I mean - I guess he's pumped shitcoins like this and advertised the charges?

http://xc-official.com/xcurrency-code-reviews-the-de-facto-standard-of-legitimacy-among-altcoins.html

When in reality they look like this.

Dan Metcalf has done more for crypto then these clowns will ever think of. Who are you people to criticize him? Starting to wonder if these fudders are paid to fud. That's the only thing that would make sense of their behavior.

Funny thing is XCurrency supporters support blocknet.  When framing / justifying why they need so many bitcoins the story is "it's a lot of work".  When concerns are raised that it will slow down XCurrency development it's "only going to take blah blah blah"  Dan is supposedly the mastermined but it "won't distract him from XCurrency"  There are other developers involved in the project who have not been named.  

Look at this tired old "I tried to hard" website - http://xc-official.com/
Vs the effort put into the new one - http://theblocknet.com/

From what I can tell the Blocknet is mostly and API + decentralized exchange.  Websites say it all.  Off with the old, on with the new.


haha this is what I can't figure out.  They do their IPO without even listing devs or answering technical questions.

Even if everything works (no timelines committed to or talked about) in three months do you really think you're going to want to send 1,000 XC worth $250 using the SMS coin that by the time it dumps and you account for slippage in the exchange you'll have $35?  They're building an empty city (actually pinkie swearing to build an empty city while abandoning the last city they were working on after they get some bitcoins)

They're getting smarter too.  Taking bitcoins instead of just pre-orders of the currency / assets they plan on creating