Topic: [SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed - page 30. (Read 100179 times)

This deserves it's own thread rofl.  ACTSecure suing spotniek.

love you man ... making the scammers sweat bullets

i say, that shit scam 29 oct - https://twitter.com/Anti_Pump/status/527552242636042241

Tons of proof has been posted so get over it it or debunk it.. or get on with your lawsuit threats !

and by the way mouthy little cunt.. who do you represent when you PM'd me your suing me ?

Problem is that you still have no EVIDENCE.

Yeah
you did it a million times in a dishonest way AND you used Moderators trusted on exchanges to get the job done.

and have lied about much of it by doing things such as having your dev review his own coin.

also it's funny you avoided me and hid under your bed when i asked if your name was Dan LOL

a pump ?
yeah a scam engineered to line your own pockets..
when your group was in Cryptsy chat i said so you guys scream buy buy buy non stop do you tell guys when to sell ?
and you guys replied back.. no that is their problem..
in other words you sucker them into buying them dump on them hard while lying your ass off about this big future for XYZ shitcoin to noobs.

yes you are scum.

Prom is trying to crash the price of SDC with his statements as some form of retribution.  The price has only risen as a result since many know that the road to success is to do the opposite of what Prom says.

The price of XC, this poll - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-is-dan-metcalf-xcurrency-developer-finished-842330 and the majority of the forum members have made it so aweful your group is having to switch forums.

I believe the majority has spoken.  Enjoy your circlejerk at the new XC forums.

Zzzzzz. Cut the noble bullshit, only a retard wouldn't see straight through your veil of FUD.

I admit, there is always a certain degree of bias.  You're invested in Blocknet and I'm invested in SuperNET.  But no, I do not see blocknet as a direct threat.  And no, the accusations are not entirely baseless.  That's a very common theme among people screaming that something is FUD instead of trying to legitimately defend their views.  In my opinion, there is convincing evidence of the shadiness of the people behind Blocknet (a lot of which are posted in this thread).  Of course, there is by no means a "smoking gun", but there's enough of these bits and pieces of information around that I have formed a conclusion.

And no, this is not bashing.  This is taking some rather convincing evidence provided and forming an opinion on it.  I have not gone around and explicitly tell people to not invest in Blocknet and that it is a scam.  I'm just saying to be cautious.  At the same time, I have also not gone around promoting SuperNET and telling people to invest in it.  These things people can decide on their own.

If you're curious about my motivations, consider this:
If you go through my post history, which I assume you have a bit, you can see that I used to support Keycoin (quite sincerely, I might add).  This was when I was pretty much a newbie looking for a good project to invest in and was not aware of what was really going on.  Yes, I did profit from it, but that was pure luck on my part (i.e. I did not anticipate a pump/dump).  I subsequently discovered some odd things surrounding it and decided I did not want to take part in it anymore.  This led me to my current views on things.  My point is, I've been in the shoes of a "newbie" so I understand that whole mentality.  Although I was very lucky, there are others out there who may not be.  Which is why I say:  be cautious.

If something is truthful or not truthful has nothing to do with the messenger. 

It's why you guys are always trying to deflect from the issue at hand.  Discredit the messenger, ignore the message.

Yup. He's full of crap and advancing his agenda all over this forum - to smear the reputation of XC and Dan at every possible juncture.

Yep XC caught my attention and bugged the shit out of me.

After XC dies I'm sure another coin will.  And another.  Until I get tired of it or this place just completely dries up.

Hmmmm.... the difference I'm seeing is that BlueMeanie (originator of the above jl777scam.com) spent literally weeks of his time attacking Nxt and SuperNet, going so far as to offer fairly large rewards for information.
Even with all that effort......he couldn't come up with any evidence or any real support for his FUD.

On the BlockNet controversy, I'm seeing a fair amount of evidence (like the chatlogs) and also a lot of sane people weighing in against BlockNet and associated currencies.
XC's response to the FUD so far has also been more than a little weak.......ffs, Nxt has been under constant attack since it's inception, with a massive campaign being waged against it recently. Did Nxt shut down and run away?

If BlockNet is legit, they should simply stand their ground and let the results of their work speak for themselves. Good tech and the truth will win out in the end.

(and, yeah, I'm invested in SuperNet, but I also have a fairly big handful of NHZ and am running a public NHZ node, so if BlockNet does go to the moon, I'll stand to make some profit there, just for disclosure)

Does no one in this community any favours? Give me a break. I've seen you all over XC related threads bashing them. Again, I'm not naive enough to think you make it your full time job here to warn others of what you perceive to be bad investments - especially when it's aimed at XC exclusively. It's people like you who are ruining this forum. I'm done wasting my time with you.

oh no !! you busted me, yes sadly MC is FontasMetcalfPr0mWolongKarpeles!

and not MetCalf

MC is an skype habit its a bit hard talking to 2x Dans so MC is Dan MetCalf because atcsecure takes longer to type ...

Discrediting what someone brings to the table when they have a problem with at coin just because they support another coin does no one in this community any favors.

I have no competing coins (I do own some monero & bbr... don't consider it competition to XC.  And I dislike the supernet).  But yeah.  I got a problem with this closed sourced nazi circlejerk group that ignores evidence and does it's best to discredit those who actually want the truth.

Just because it makes no sense to you for someone to have a problem and post when they consider something is a scam (because you wouldn't post in their shoes) doesn't make what they have to say irrelevant.

I see the defense of all this shit as "Dan would never do that - his identity is known" "Your just from YCoin.  You're biased you should have nothing to say."

Want in on a secret?  Shit like this promethieus guy kills the entire altcoin community when the name of the game is constantly drawing blood from noobs instead of having legitimate projects.  And the fact that your developer has helped him pump these shitcoins at the expense of noobs so cynical veterans operating behind the scenses can pad their pockets is why this entire scene is going to hell in a handbasket.

So yeah.  I give a shit.  And I'm sorry if you don't think it's legitimate for me to care.  That's your problem.  Go drink some antifreeze

/endofrant

Look for coins where devs are begging for donations instead of a premine.  Litecoin, dogecoin, peercoin, BBR, Monero (both Monero & BBR might be tainted depending on how you look at things).  Older PoW coins (and a select few new ones) appear to not be scams.

Most of this place is shady as hell.

Sad part is I'm not convinced there is anything to be gained by putting money in non scam coins.
[/quote]

I hear you. I am invested in other coins with good devs and communities. The only thing you get out of it is the feel good feeling you are not getting scammed even if your investment keeps tanking.

Hype and PR drives this marketplace. Hopefully, people will start investing in established projects instead of chasing the very elusive quick buck.

To say the Blocknet creators are 'shady' is to imply that the project itself is shady - or a scam. You're making accusations without any proof.

You didn't mention Supernet because you want give the impression to potential blocknet investors that your opinions are impartial and unbiased. This couldn't be further from the truth as blocknet is in direct competiton with supernet - with whom you have a vested interest in. This is clear from your posting history.

What's more likely here:

1. You're a knight in shining armour using your spare time and effort trying to save strangers from a "scam".

or

2. As an investor of supernet, you see blocknet as a direct threat and so wish to tarnish its reputation with baseless accusations.

Imma go with 2, Bob.

Disclaimer: I'm invested in Blocknet. I do not, however, spend my time bashing supernet. Quite the contrary, competition is good. Also, if I truly believed Blocknet was a scam I could sell my Blocknet tokens on an exchange for a fraction below what I originally invested.

Uhhh.. what?  That link you posted doesn't even contain any argument.  I'm definitely open for alternative perspectives and I was expecting something a bit more convincing, but I guess I gave you too much credit.

All comments being made in the Blocknet thread are being deleted.. Not FUD but valid posts. Blocknet wants to remain open source but is advertising Utility coin on all its logos. I suggested removing Utility from their PR and my threads were deleted..