Topic: SCAM - mycoinchange.io / mycoinchange.net (.co , .ai) - Fake Crypto Exchange (Read 574 times)

What security breach and what personal information? You literally only posted one identity here, a mere name, that you posted yourself, that I think no one seemingly bother to check its legitimacy, so how does the forum --once again-- responsible for that? You have proof to back up that claim? It awfully looks like an evasive attempt to the legitimate questions about your project.

For example, on your original post [yes, everything is archived here], you didn't even address the question about your service's age, again.

We have faced a serious security breach due to the amount of personal information that was shared on this forum. We will not be discussing private matters any longer on an open forum.

Thank you for your consideration,

MyCoinChange.

I think I just gave myself a serious case of migraine reading the past few replies here. And no, that's not sarcasm, I'm literally and seriously having a migraine while reading this thread.

support212, please learn how to quote, the forum facilitate a quoting mechanism to help people understand who said what and when. "Quoting" in italic can be very confusing. You claimed that you have front and back end developers, I believe they can teach you how to use this feature if you can't figure it out yourself.

That said and to address all of your latest reply that goes in circle, you need to stop with the victim mentality.

Not everybody is conspiring with everybody else on this forum and across platforms to sabotage your service. You repetitively said that people should just send you a PM outlining these points instead of going straight through creating this thread. Here's a reality check: the world does not here to cater your needs and adjust to meet your needs, so instead of thinking you're the victim of everything, instead of asking for people to approach you quietly and inform you on what to do and what not to do, why don't you simply just not pull those "bad marketing" ploy? You won't be in this situation if you're being honest from the start.

You shouldn't expect to pull some maneuver, a very bad one, and later on cry about people conspiring against you, accusing them of sending DDoS, the forum is a mob that try to drown you, etc. If I may repeat myself, you're in this situation because of the stunt you made, people read what's provided here and see for themselves that there are questionable aspects in your project. No one will point out questionable aspects in your project if you did not provide questionable materials. Fix them instead of assigning blame.

And no, that is not me angry or approaching this case with disdain, this is me tired of you going in circle with your victim mentality, you-vs-the-big-bad-world. If you're serious with your project and try to have a legitimate and long lasting business, own your mistake, fix them all, and stop thinking like everybody is conspiring against you.

The forum is a neutral ground, many people here simply wants to keep their community secure. I don't think any of them plan anything bad like you think we do, DDoS and hacking and all. Unless you have a smoking gun proving the claim, it's all in your mind. You provide a service, wouldn't it be normal for anyone, literally anyone on the internet, tries to attack you?

Look at the forum itself, it's on a constant DDos attack. Will it be fair if we argue that it's you who organize the DDoS to retaliate against the forum for whatever situation you're currently having?

And then this,


This sounds awfully like a coercion, "stop asking details about us or we will publish content smearing you." Really? And this too,


On what basis? Because he pointed out several questionable things about your platform? [I'll leave out the question on how will your lawyer address the OP, to where and to whom] Is this how you'll react to anyone pointing out questionable things about your platform? Bugs too? Your... lawyer condone this? To threaten anyone trying to point out alarming aspect about your project with lawsuit? If at one point your customer wrote a review in a platform and think you have a very poor service because he's not satisfied with your platform, you'll throw them a lawsuit?

To be honest, thinking that the founder of a platform have this kind of mindset is kinda unsettling.

The forum is not merciless. What happened with two of your older domains are already done. If it can be reversed, then good. If it can't, well, no one ask you to put fake profile, stretched numbers, inconsistencies in the age of your platform, etc. Own it and move on instead of throwing tantrum.

Oh, about the age of your platform, as I notice it's always conveniently left out, I'll ask again: please explain about your platform's age that you've keep leave unanswered. You're around since mid-2023? Barely a year? And on your website you're still claiming to be around since 2018. Or were you truly been around since 2018 and only five years later registering your business?

Here's a little advise, before you threaten to slap OP [or anyone who dared to question you] with lawsuit, you might want to consult to your lawyer about the whole things being pointed out here, all those "bad marketing" ploy from the law perspective. Oh, a lot of them are archived, by the way.

And once again if you wondered, no, this is still me not angry, this is me being exhausted with people who seemingly --at least to me-- very childish and yet tried to run a business.


Not every issues have been addressed, there are questions and points on this thread that you've conveniently leave out. Your service's age, for instance, the "stock photo" issue. Do you want me to help you with a list, perhaps?

.

Firstly, here is proof provided in this thread that contradicts your statement, once again proving that you are lying. Additionally, you claim to have caught me lying, which is yet another lie fabricated by you, Support212, as I have consistently backed up my claims unlike you; it is evident to everyone reading this forum, and this might be the reason why domain registrars and MetaMask have blocked your websites.

Basically, you are plagiarizing my claims against other cyber crypto scammers that I exposed on BitcoinTalk, who also operate fraudulent cryptocurrency exchanges where evidence is provided in the threads I initiated, showcasing their "similar writing style". This merely indicates your lack of valid arguments. It should be noted that, like millions of other individuals, I have proficient English skills in my native language, and this doesn't prove that all these people are a single individual.
If you believe otherwise, please provide clear evidence instead of fabricating nonsensical connections, like the claim of a "similar writing style." Unlike the scammers I exposed in other threads, my English is free of errors and typos. It is worth noting that these errors and typos were evident in their writing, and this was just one of the indicators I presented against them.

You allege that I own the GitHub profile "Jackofus80", which is untrue as I have no association or connection to it. If you believe otherwise, please provide clear evidence instead of fabricating baseless connections without any reliable evidence.

You asked, "Who has been phished?" and "Who has been defrauded of money?" To which I responded:

You now claim, "Your excuse is that I deleted reviews", and "Your excuse is that I deleted reviews", both of which are lies, as proven in this thread. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to re-read what I wrote in response to better comprehend the situation.


You claim that I provided "no proof" and "baseless claims", which is another lie. The thread is full of evidence and backing for the claims I made, so I don't understand why you contradict yourself so strongly, even when there is proof available.
Also, I need to clarify that "Jackofus80" is not my alias, and I don't have a GitHub account or any association or connection to the account mentioned, as I previously stated. If you believe otherwise, please provide reliable evidence to support your claim.
You wrote, "Furthermore, the audience knows who is legitimate" and I fully agree with this statement.
There is substantial evidence and a multitude of indicators proving that "MyCoinChange" is indeed a scam platform, evidenced by domain registrars and MetaMask blocking it to protect innocent people from falling victim to this fraud.

You responded to a question from "holydarkness" in your reply, not to me, and you claimed that "OP coincidentally didn't answer". It's quite astonishing.

NICENIC is widely known for their lack of action against abused domains involved in crypto cybercrime, phishing, and similar activities. I even mentioned this in the following link: "https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63449698".
Notably, NICENIC holds the top spot on Spamhaus's list of the most abused domain registrars worldwide, which can be verified here: "https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/registrars/".
It's worth mentioning that you chose this registrar for your new domains after your previous domain registrars promptly suspended your domains, as evidenced here: "https://www.whois.com/whois/mycoinchange.ai".
These clear indicators point towards malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange", given that you opted for the most abused domain registrar according to Spamhaus to run your websites.

Furthermore, I conducted some research on your claims. You assert that you have a Canadian license and company. However, the domain registrant of "mycoinchange.ai" states that the "Registrant Contact" and "Administrative Contact" reside in, and are from, Bulgaria (BG), not Canada (CA).

Once again, you have been exposed with undeniable evidence.

.

.

You discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that are clearly scams.
The blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities. It is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person.


Got you, yes. All in all, it seems suspicious, and the statements of support212 somehow contradict themselves sometimes.

___

The proof lies in the linked reply: the malicious writer of the suspended Medium blog posts actively promoted fraudulent scam websites, including crypto mixer phishing sites, alongside "MyCoinChange" in their blog posts, revealing evident malicious intent and a connection between the fraudulent writer and you, which you confirmed, as can be seen below in this reply.

This is not true, you wrote that:  

I did not block anything and do not have access to MetaMask codes, nor do I have a GitHub account; you are making false claims, so if you are going to make such accusations, provide evidence or they are simply false and baseless accusations again.


Not every person is aware of these forums or knows how and where to report online crypto scams; additionally, many fraudsters flag reviews on reviewing platforms or block comments on social media channels to conceal negative experiences from people. The thread contains ample evidence and indicators, which can be read from my original post on page 1 down to this point. Moreover, I have real-life responsibilities and a busy schedule like everyone else; therefore, this is not a power trip, but rather a genuine attempt to caution others about the malicious and suspicious indicators surrounding "MyCoinChange" based on the information I have shared here.


You did not answer the question; instead, you badmouthed this thread in an attempt to tactfully avoid giving answers to questions regarding "MyCoinChange" and what should serve as evidence for AI-generated videos.


"ChangeNow.io" is a legitimate website, but I did not even mention this anywhere before as you wrote, "You admitted that the ChangeNow PR was legitimate.".
Additionally, you are once again accusing me of something I never did before, and regarding the other PRs you linked, why did you write that they show legitimacy even if they can be bought with money?


I have no association with any of the accounts in the linked GitHub link; this is not my case there.


This thread is filled with evidence and indicators that "MyCoinChange" has acted maliciously and fraudulently in the past; one just needs to read through it and refrain from gaslighting others by claiming there is nothing malicious or that everything is fine. The code doesn't necessarily need to contain a "virus" or "malicious" code, as often a well-designed website can deceive people into unknowingly sending their hard-earned cryptocurrency to such suspicious platforms.


Holydarkness discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that were clearly scams, and the blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities; thus, it is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person.
Now, you claim that the banned Medium writer were originally associated with your company, indicating that you had clear association with fraudulent individuals who were active in crypto cybercrime, as they promoted your website "MyCoinChange" on the same "promotion blog" while they worked with you.


Who has been phished? I don't know, as I don't have access to your victims or any information regarding the number of victims affected by the "MyCoinChange" scam. It's worth noting that fraudsters often flag reviews and seek to delete negative content that could undermine their ongoing cryptocurrency scam, and not everyone is aware of platforms like this to report such incidents. Nevertheless, the most impactful action I can take is to expose the malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange," as demonstrated here.

___
The account "@wilfredgrimes" on Medium even had a "MyCoinChange" Linktree link in their bio, which could potentially be your account too, especially considering your demonstrated disregard for "identity stretching".
Additionally, all the articles are recent and no older than a month, suggesting the possibility of using AI to generate fabricated content against legitimate organizations and companies like BitcoinTalk and MetaMask, with the aim of defaming them for exposing or blocking "MyCoinChange" because of the clearly malicious activities associated with the platform.

Once again, you fail to provide any substantial proof and instead resort to attempting to manipulate people through social engineering, which is quite outrageous.

OP here's more content for you since you love reading:

How Legitimate Companies are Suffering from Metamask’s Unfair Practices (100's of views, starting to trend on Google!)

https://medium.com/coinmonks/how-legitimate-companies-are-suffering-from-metamasks-unfair-practices-450a31728812

Exposed: The Truth About bitcointalk.org’s Scam Service. (100's of views, it seems that other exchanges find this article useful!)

https://medium.com/coinmonks/exposed-the-truth-about-bitcointalk-orgs-scam-service-224301b9d5ca


Many tests and another happy customer on MyCoinChange!

https://imgur.com/tem8uYo

.

.

Correction: that post is talking about that the article is likely made with the purpose to promote this platform, as all signs point to it. I am not claiming or pointing out that they are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer.


I believe you misunderstood this part. He said the business has 180 days to be registered, it means his govt allows up to 180 days for a project to legalize themselves since they go public. And thus, them being registered in September 2023 still within this 180 days window.

However... That's a completely different story if they've been launched since 2018 as their website claimed and only registered on September 2023.

"Support212" is accusing me of crimes such as "DDoS", which is completely unfounded as I have never engaged in such activities and will never do so, therefore, if you are going to make these accusations, provide evidence (which cannot exist as I have no involvement in such things).

I do not make false claims, and if you believe otherwise, prove me wrong, as the thread is filled with evidence that demonstrates your inaccuracies, "support212".
Even other BitcoinTalk users, such as "holydarkness", have discovered that your websites are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer scam phishing websites, which can be seen here: "https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62524556".

"I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use. Identity theft is a stretch, they were not on an official document," you stated, support212. This is, in fact, another falsehood because user "albon" exposed that these profile pictures belonged to normal private individuals, as proven here:
"https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62517333".

Support212 claims that I am "blocking exchanges illegally", which is another lie as I am unable to block anything, so please provide proof that I have blocked your "exchanges illegally", as you have stated.

Support212 also wrote, "Let's focus on the real scammers, it's OP" which is a completely baseless projection of your own activities onto me, as I have reported scams on this platform with evidence and indicators, while you only make claims without any evidence to support your false accusations of me being a scammer. The primary focus of this thread is exposing the malicious activities of the "MyCoinChange" website.

Support212, you created some videos with AI and are using them as evidence for what exactly? This is highly unprofessional and lacks any logical sense.

Additionally, you mention "PR" from your website, which essentially holds no significance as it can be purchased with money, so using this as proof of legitimacy is also malicious, from my perspective.

I have not blocked or suspended any domains; only the domain registrar has the power to do so. It appears that they suspended your domains due to violations of terms of service and policies, such as running a crypto scam or operating a fake crypto exchange, for example.

You claimed, "The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September 2023," but this topic predates the registration of the business by several months, so essentially, you admit that you did not have a license or any similar authorization when you started these suspicious-looking websites, support212.

Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange".

Nope, nothing changed. I am still not angry or try to play nice with you... or stoned. If you feel that there is a change in my tone, it's completely in your head as I am still addressing your situation with a healthy degree of scepticism.

Talking about your platform age, so it's been around for... Half a year? One year? And yet you still have someone on your review page saying he's using it for two years and you yourself claimed that your exchange was launched in 2018. Another bad marketing?

This relates with your issue about the "damage" happened to you that's caused by the "community" and OP. Do you think those platforms will do whatever unfortunate thing that befall into your platform simply because OP and the community asked them to or is it more to because they find that the supporting evidences are valid? Let's dive deeper about this, the community helping OP reporting your platform, do you think they do that simply for malicious agenda or because they find that the supporting evidence provided by OP, i.e. your "bad marketing", to be valid?

No one can eliminate this issue other than yourself, especially as this whole situation is not necessarily has to happen if you... didn't try to pull that stunt you did, and still do, for whatever reason.

.

Ahh... yes, I must have missed it. My mistake and I apologize for that. I am looking for that registration number in your website, not realizing it's provided here. The image given by above link, though, is invalid. Perhaps reupload them? Try talkimg.

And again I asked, how long has your platform been around? Your license said it's formalized on September 2023? And how about that team situation? It's also left unexplained.


Hmm... still can't find an explanation where the forum encourage and incentivize OP to attack your site in form of DDoS, hacking, exploiting, and spamming. Perhaps you don't mind to provide explanation backed by evidence about it again?


You sure you're not the one coming back with more emotion here? I check mine and it's fine. So far, I think I did not write anything offensive or showing negative emotion like anger or disdain on this thread, sceptical perhaps, but that'll be because your platform utilize... "bad marketing".

On the other side, you're asking to doxx me and OP. Want to revise that request, perhaps? And reflect to yourself while you're at it? "Smoking too much weed perhaps? Illiterate? or a troll? Come get on a video call with me and lets read together." I think this shows more emotion than I've ever been on this thread?

.

.

Oh? The business is legitimate? As in registered and licensed? I can't find this information on your website. Can you perhaps provide that information? That'll gives some sort of assurance.


The question being asked here is that six months ago you said you'll find support staff with real picture once you acquire them, and now they're blank. If I may simplify the question, are you the only one working on this platform? You handle everything, including support, etc.?

Allow me to ask another, how long has this project running? When did it start, exactly?


Isn't that what I am currently doing? Looking into the statement you made about this forum incentivize OP to attack you in form of DDoS? And now, hacking, exploiting, and spamming too. Do you mind to provide the proof of it? That the forum encourage OP and/or are behind those attacks?

.

It's stretching the truth, exagerrating numbers, fake reviews, and fake profile pictures that lead me to believe the practice is shady, or at the very least, should be approached with cautions. Are you not agree that if a business tried to sell themselves with such criteria is questionable?

Do you mind to perhaps explain this? Two years? It's a real review? All of those reviews are real?



Or perhaps answer to my previously unanswered question about the numbers that's used to be in your website?


Also, about the live support that's now removed, you previously stated as below, does that mean up to this second you still doesn't have anyone to handle support? So who exactly will answer your customers when they reached to your platform for help?


As for DDOS, the forum incentivized OP to do this? You have proof of it? That the forum encourage OP to do so?

.

.

.

So, now you are claiming that a profile on GitHub belongs to me, but I have no association or connection with it. However, when I tried to visit it, I received a 404 error.
This profile you mentioned does not belong to me.
I am still waiting for your evidence, "Jerayer". Additionally, I have no knowledge of the user you linked or what they wrote.
You are essentially claiming that this profile belongs to me without any evidence, proof, connection, or association, which is truly absurd.

It is also interesting and embarrassing that you are copying my texts and writing style to use against me, which clearly demonstrates your lack of originality.

Furthermore, the BitcoinTalk threads you linked are simply a reaction to exposed scams by me. Similar to you, these scammers are trying to shift the blame onto others who exposed their fraudulent projects and are engaging in harassment and defamation. Just like "icryptofbi", you, "Jerayer", have no evidence or proof to support your claims.
You have also adopted his method of harassing me by accusing me of having connections to sites that I have no association with. Of course, none of you have evidence or proof like I have against your scam projects. I understand that scammers like you, Jerayer, are frustrated because I am informing innocent people about these crypto scams and trying protecting them with this. I am able to expose these crypto scam phishing methods and share awareness with users on the BitcoinTalk forum, thereby preventing scammers like you from having any control over the situation.
I hope that scammers like you will be held accountable for the damage you have caused.

The websites you mentioned do not belong to me, and the GitHub account also does not belong to me. I, along with other users here like holydarkness, have asked for evidence to support your claims, but you have failed to provide any. Instead, you continue to make baseless and false accusations, while engaging in harassment and defamation against me for exposing your "Boomchange" crypto scam project which can be seen here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-boomchangecom-boomchangeio-boomchangenet-fake-crypto-exchanges-5454622

It is intriguing that "Jerayer" is also defending the malicious tactics of "MyCoinChange" mentioned in these threads, which are clearly fraudulent and illegitimate. It seems that scammers like you two are able to understand and support each other's actions without even communicating directly.  

Furthermore, it has come to my attention that on the date of 1/3/2024, you made a statement regarding your usage of the websites you mentioned. According to your statement, you claimed to have used these scam websites for exchanging Ethereum (ETH) to Bitcoin (BTC) in early December 2023. However, you expressed dissatisfaction with the outcome, which can be seen in the following reply from you: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63436255 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030129/https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63436255)

Interestingly, it seems that you conveniently forgot about a previous incident that occurred almost a year ago on the same websites you mentioned, on 4/28/2023. On this date, on the platform GitHub, you made a claim that these same websites had scammed you out of 200 USDT. This information can be verified through the following link: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430 (https://web.archive.org/web/20240106030319/https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/12425#issue-1688854430)

These instances clearly demonstrate the lack of credibility in your statements and claims.
It appears that you used these scam websites again after previously falling victim to their fraudulent activities.
Such actions contradict your claims and expose your attempt to engage in slander, defamation, and harassment towards others, as your statements and comments lack genuine experiences and are therefore unreliable due to their self-contradictory nature.

It is crucial to consider these contradictory occurrences and evaluate the intentions behind your allegations. It seems clear that your actions are aimed at tarnishing the reputation of individuals and engaging in malicious behavior rather than presenting valid arguments or evidence.

Of course have. Here is the link to his profile on GitHub: https://github.com/Yandex41

I looked, they even deleted/blocked this profile already. On GitHub he wrote copies of messages from this forum 1 in 1 and also asked to exclude some of these domains from blacklists:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

In the Google archives there are still some pages on GitHub where the user Yandex41 participates and which 1 in 1 provides texts from this forum and inserts links from this forum that he himself (Bitcoadvice) wrote.

Also on this forum (some examples: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-coinchangersnet-fake-crypto-exchanges-5475616 , https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/resolved-coinchangeio-coinchange-financial-5479174 ), several topics talk about his connection with these scam domains. I didn’t come up with this connection out of myself.

-----

Regarding personal data, I am only in favor of finding such people and bringing them to justice. Of course, I don’t know if they have an agreement with these users, or specifically what kind of violations there are, but I repeat, this is either a stupid marketing ploy, or perhaps a violation of the rights of other people. But since I don’t know the essence and there are no specific complaints from these individuals, I cannot call this site a scam.
And in my opinion, scammers do not publicly admit their mistakes and do not speak honestly.

This is interesting, I just took a glance here and there, so I can't be sure I grasp the whole situation, but I believe you have something as an evidence to back up this claim? Otherwise, I think it's... slander.


What does it make the website and the owner, then? An identity thief? I think there is a law prohibiting people using other people's credential as their own?

The individual known as "Jerayer" is associated with the crypto fake exchange scam phishing platform called "Boomchange" which I have exposed in the following topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-boomchangecom-boomchangeio-boomchangenet-fake-crypto-exchanges-5454622

Furthermore, it is evident that "Jerayer" continues to promote the fraudulent website through social engineering tactics and unsubstantiated claims, as he has failed to address any valid points I raised regarding the fraudulent activities of "Boomchange" which can be seen here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63440802 , https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63443260

Instead, he consistently resorts to blatant lies and deception, as can be observed in my thread where I have exposed him, which is truly absurd.

Another method of social engineering employed by "Jerayer" is falsely accusing me of being associated with the websites he mentioned, as scammers often believe that their "competitors" are the ones exposing them, attempting to portray me as such because he assumes victims and those with good intentions don't seek justice, only their "competitors"; however, I have already made it clear that I have no association or connection to the mentioned websites and my sole intention is to expose scams whenever I have the opportunity to do so, unlike "Jerayer" who fails to provide any evidence or substantiation for his claims, as evidenced in this thread or the aforementioned ones I linked, unlike me, as I always back my assertions with clear evidence, highlighting the apparent difference as well as his evident attempt to promote the fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange platform "Boomchange" on this forum.

Another point worth noting is that "Jerayer" consistently comments on every topic where I expose various cryptocurrency scam networks, attempting to defend the ones I have exposed and undermine my credibility, but his efforts are futile as I possess undeniable evidence, ultimately tarnishing Jerayer's own credibility; it appears that he has reached his limit and, in the end, the correctness will always prevail, revealing fraud for what it truly is.

Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme.

In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.

Wait, roll back a bit, what scam does the OP do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo?

Firstly, I use this service and other currency exchange services, but do not manage them. Secondly, do you have evidence that I control them? Or are you an empty talker and talk everywhere without evidence? You haven't written any worthwhile evidence in this topic. You only think that this proves fraud, since you are very close to fraud. Slander is a type of fraud.

Your websites prove that you are scamming:

1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net

---

"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.

Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth

I report cryptocurrency scam network schemes, including yours, which has also fallen under it under the name "Boomchange" (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-boomchangecom-boomchangeio-boomchangenet-fake-crypto-exchanges-5454622).

Despite you considering me as a competitor, I am merely exposing crypto scams on BitcoinTalk. Not everyone who exposes crypto scams, including myself, is involved in them like you, Jerayer.
You have exposed yourself by confirming that you operate a fraudulent crypto scam exchange. Each of my threads contains substantial evidence, so I recommend that you read the thread thoroughly before posting baseless and untrue replies.

I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.

It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.

.

The good news is that browsers like Opera are flagging the remaining two active domains as fraudulent.



On Google Chrome, Extension like Metamask or Coinbase wallet also show a warning as soon as you try to visit the domains. I guess the scam is going now where, as far as the current domain names are concerned.

.

It has come to our attention that the fraudulent operator behind the previously blocked domains of MyCoinChange has resurfaced and is now operating under the new phishing websites "mycoinchange.co" and "mycoinchange.ai".

To lure unsuspecting victims, he is actively promoting his new website through several platforms, including SiteJabber (https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/mycoinchange.co), where he even managed to obtain a blue verification tick by falsely verifying a SMS. Additionally, he has created fake Medium blogs (https://medium.com/coinmonks/introducing-mycoinchange-the-most-secure-cryptocurrency-trading-platform-for-2023-ca54fb05d8fd) to further legitimize his scam, and he can be found on Trustpilot (https://trustpilot.com/review/mycoinchange.co), Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/user/Mycoinchange_co/), Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/@mycoinchange_co/channels), and Pinterest (https://www.pinterest.jp/mycoinchange_co/), and Bittrust (https://bittrust.org/mycoinchange). Furthermore, he maintains a Telegram channel (https://t.me/s/MCCcrew) where he continues to deceive users.

It is crucial to note that the operator of MyCoinChange has resorted to purchasing fake reviews for his Trustpilot and Sitejabber websites in an attempt to deceive potential users. These reviews exhibit clear patterns of malicious activity, as they predominantly come from newly created accounts with just one review. Additionally, the names associated with these reviews do not align with the countries mentioned in the reviews, raising further suspicion about their authenticity.

Such manipulative tactics are often used by scammers to create a false sense of credibility and trustworthiness, ultimately tricking unsuspecting individuals into engaging with their fraudulent platform.

Please exercise vigilance, report any suspicious activities, and avoid providing any personal information or funds to MyCoinChange or any associated websites. It is important to spread awareness among the community to protect individuals from falling victim to this scam.

Stay safe and informed, and let us work together to expose and shut down these malicious operations.

Great job getting the site closed down!

The scam website & fake crypto exchange "mycoinchange.io" has now been suspended by the domain registrar.

EDIT:
The Fraudster bought a new domain named "mycoinchange.net" where he will continue his abuse. He changed the clickable URL in his article "https://medium.com/@michaelkortiz17/how-to-convert-bitcoin-btc-to-monero-xmr-safely-in-2023-2530a2c6ec91" to "mycoinchange.net" as "mycoinchange.io" got suspended for fraud and abuse.

You can report the new phishing domain "mycoinchange.net" to their registrar:

PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
https://publicdomainregistry.com/process-for-handling-abuse/
[email protected]

.

You are right there isn't a customer that is going to say that your website works like a charm without any issue because those customers don't exist in real life and all of them are just fake promises. I have never used your site and I will never use a site that seems fishy from its name.

However, I'm quite sure that you have made fake reviews, and fake customer support team, and that proves that something is fishy in your website, and anyone who ever do any transactions on the site will most probably end up losing the money.

If you still think that your words are enough to explain your honesty, then kindly prove that why you have used fake customer support team and fake reviews for your site? If you can explain in a brief and convincible reply then your reputation might get a little better.

.

The post quoted above contradicts itself in several parts, which I have listed here below.

1. The statement "I may have stretched the truth slightly" contradicts the earlier claim that there is an explanation for everything and that there is no intention to scam anyone. Stretching the truth implies dishonesty and undermines the claim of providing a authentic service and at the same time it shows the fraudulent intentions.

2. The statement "I will deal with it personally and see to it that you receive your funds and as quoted" contradicts the earlier claim that there are no stuck exchanges and everyone who has done a transaction has received their funds. This suggests that there might be issues and problems with his fraudulent "exchange".

3. The statement "The pictures of the support staff and some reviews will be replaced with real personal once I've acquired them" contradicts the claim of providing a reputable service. Using fake or temporary pictures and reviews is manipulation and fraud on the psyche of the potential customer/victim.

4. The statement "I have a marketing team that posts content on many websites" contradicts the earlier claim of providing accurate and up-to-date information by the presumably invented "marketing team". If the information posted by the conscious marketing team is outdated, incorrect and including phishing websites, then it also shows that this is unprofessional and published with false criminal intentions to trick people and scam their crypto.

Overall, the post by the new account "support212" contradicts itself by making claims that undermine trust and raise doubts about the fact that this is a clear scam.

Quoted in full for future reference.

You're disappointed because someone unearthed the fact that your platform use fake reviews and fake customer support profile pictures, and your defense to justify it was that you've invested so much on this platform and you may have "stretched the truth" slightly? Slightly?

Am I correct to understand you perceive fake reviews which said --and will lead gullible people to believe-- your project has been around at least for four times longer than it actually is, and customer supports that's not even existed yet because, "The pictures of the support staff and some reviews will be replaced with real personal once I've acquired them" as something that's should be accepted?

Further, how exactly can you hire --and thus, prioritize-- marketing team --implying, though not necessarily means, more than one person-- instead of customer support? Which kind of strategic planning is this? Why can't you hire a single person as your customer service, especially as you said you've invested so much on it? Or, since the customer support team is currently nonexistent and you seemingly handled them yourself, why don't you just use your picture instead of using fake profiles?

Last, I also understand correctly that these numbers are also "slightly stretched"?

.

All signs point to it, that the article is to promote mycoinexchange. The writer proposed five exchanges, those are:

1. mycoinexchange - enough said
2. smartmix - which archived four days ago as a mixer, but as per today's archive, by me, shows a completely different... page [also read last part of Potato Chips' post above this]



3. bitblender - inaccessible tor page
4. chipmixer - as stated by Potato Chips above this
5. cryptomixer - as stated by Potato Chips above this

It's correct however it's the v2 onion link and CM moved to v3 which is the chipmixorfly, see ANN: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-chipmixercom-bitcoin-mixer-bitcoin-tumbler-mixing-reinvented-1935098.

Regardless, I wouldn't dare click any links on the article as it's been established the publisher/author has malicious intent. I suspect the information where the article is based from or copied from is of long ago seeing how a lot of data is outdated. Aside from CM, another closed service is also listed - bitblender.

CryptoMixer has an outdated onion link as well

Malicious article:


ANN

Lastly, it's worth noting that SmartMix.io (on #2) is a scam, see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/smartmixio-scam-bitcoin-mixing-service-5168581

The whole medium article is a joke! It was written one day ago and in it, the author is promoting chipmixer as one of the best mixers but we all know that chipmixer has been taken down and it's not operational any more. Also I have doubts about the onion address he shared, because as far as I know the real address starts with mixorfly or something like that.
Unfortunately, I don't have tor on my mobile so I can't verify it myself.

I would not trust a writer who only has one follower and instead of promoting top exchanges opted to promote unknown and new exchanges if you check

If you check all his articles all of them are meant to promote mycoinchange.io, I'm sure he is part of the team or being paid to shill mycoinchange.io.

https://medium.com/@michaelkortiz17

Only trust reputable writers and from reputable media sites like Cointelegram, Medium sites are now being used by scammers to shill their platform, I'm not saying you should not trust Medium but double check if the writer is shilling an unknown and dubious platform.

These writers should be reported for promoting questionable platforms, and only trust popular exchanges with positive reviews from real users.

Anyway, their trial version site is here: https://test33.fun

Another odd advantage in their service.
They bother explaining about asset storage with backing up keys, which is clearly not their orientation at all as a p2p exchange to offer storage wallets.

Huh? there was no mention of OP being a victim though.


Wdym? we have sir Herrera who surpassed the constraints of time and used the exchange before it existed! (lol)



I'm kidding of course lol. Plus the testimonials on their website are fake - photos of people are either a stock image or stolen. CExs business relies on people's confidence on them and this kind of dishonesty from the get go says a lot about one's intention 


Sleazy article, I have reported hoping it does help. If anyone who has a medium account or is willing to create an account, here's how you can report: https://help.medium.com/hc/en-us/articles/217047977-Report-posts-lists-and-users

Thank you for posting this warning about the scam Mycoinchange platform.

I have not tried this platform and have not heard of it before, and they do not have any information about the team or any information about it, and after I reviewed it, it turned out that their support team is fake


https://www.linkedin.com/in/erica-howard-potter-2779603/
https://www.haa.pitt.edu/people/rebecca-lowery

---

The logo they put of Trustpilot also indicates that it is a clear scam because their platform is not listed on Trustpilot. They do not have any reviews or feedback other than the fake feedback on their platform that they manipulated.


They claim to have 180,000+ Satisfied Customers, and their domain age is 145 days, and there is not a single YouTube channel or blog article that mentions this scam exchange or talks about it other than the Medium post you mentioned above.

I have already reported it.

This is my first time of hearing about this exchange and again, there are some things you points out and yet you still went ahead to start making use of that exchange, usually any exchange I don't find their official site on coinmarketcap I found it difficult to trust them or even make an account with them. After you noticed those lapses why then do you still forged ahead to make deposit to that site or why didn't you share the exchange here for people that are more granded to look into and give you their ratings before making deposit to start using them?
There is nothing that can be done after sucking hell lot of money from users who falls victim to exchange, besides the name already looks very suspicious.

Attention, BitcoinTalk community:

I am writing to bring your attention to the alarming fraudulent activities carried out by the fake crypto exchange website known as "mycoinchange.io". It is crucial to delve into the specifics of this SCAM accusation, as they expose the deceptive practices and lack of credibility exhibited by the website.

To begin with, mycoinchange.io operates without providing any company information, rendering it impossible to verify the legitimacy of their operations. The absence of transparent contact details raises serious concerns regarding the platform's authenticity.

Furthermore, the website lacks any visible feedback or user reviews, an unusual circumstance for reputable crypto exchanges. It is evident that mycoinchange.io attempts to mask its lack of credibility by concealing the absence of user testimonials or complaints.

What's more, "mycoinchange.io" illicitly employs the Trustpilot logo on its website, falsely presenting itself as a trusted and reputable platform. This manipulative act blatantly violates ethical practices and further erodes their credibility.

Most critically, mycoinchange.io's exchange tool neglects to verify the authenticity of cryptocurrency addresses provided by users (🚨). Regardless of the information entered, the website redirects users to the next step without confirming the submission of a genuine cryptocurrency address. This disregard for security protocols raises serious doubts about the legitimacy and integrity of their operations.

It is imperative to protect innocent users from falling victim to these deceptive practices and potential financial losses.

I discovered this fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange through a Medium post (https://medium.com/@michaelkortiz17/review-best-top-5-cryptocurrency-tumbler-reliable-bitcoin-mixer-2023-30076dfba74) created by a fake account (banned), which deceitfully mixed legitimate crypto services in the article to socially engineer and manipulate potential victims. The actions of the fraudsters maintaining MyCoinChange.io are highly malicious.

As of 12/21/2023, the domain "MyCoinChange.io" has been successfully suspended due to its phishing and scam activities. However, the fraudster has acquired a new domain named "mycoinchange.net" to continue their abusive practices. In the article "https://medium.com/@michaelkortiz17/how-to-convert-bitcoin-btc-to-monero-xmr-safely-in-2023-2530a2c6ec91" (banned), the clickable URL has been changed to "mycoinchange.net" following the suspension of "mycoinchange.io" for fraud and abuse.

As of 12/21/2023, the new phishing domain "mycoinchange.net" has been successfully banned by the PDR domain registry.

Update as of 12/21/2023:
In addition to the previously mentioned domains, it is crucial to highlight that the operator of MyCoinChange has recently acquired two new domains for their fraudulent activities: "mycoinchange.co" and "mycoinchange.ai". This indicates their persistence in executing the crypto fraud scheme.

The actual phishing websites used by the fraudster in this case are:
- mycoinchange.io (banned)
- mycoinchange.net (banned)
- mycoinchange.ai (active)
- mycoinchange.co (active)

What makes the situation even more concerning is that the operator intentionally selected domain registrars known for engaging in shady practices. By doing so, they have made it more challenging for authorities and legitimate organizations to take down these domains and impede their illicit operations.

It is of utmost importance to remain vigilant and raise awareness about these new domains. It is vital that potential victims are informed and avoid falling into the trap set by the fraudulent operator of MyCoinChange. By working together and reporting any suspicious activities, we can enhance the chances of shutting down these deceptive practices and safeguard innocent individuals from financial harm.