I was thinking to not spend my energy and reply little bit later but I just can't read this bullshit I just can't.
You tried to be smart but it was really really silly comparison
What are you taking about, please read their terms and rules then see that this is allowed to play in the same adress.
I'm seeing that you never had any experience with betting on any sites at least little bit longer.
I've never saw such a silly comment about betting and that this way you breaking sportbook rules lol.
In every site, every I can insure you and the biggest one like bet365 it is normal, obvious and many other sites even recomending you highly, that you will invite your, like steve said brother, mother, dog under even the same house. I know many many people doing that for lot of years. The record I know, that people are all verified 10 of them and playing under the same adress. I really didn't know how come you was thinking it is not allowed.
Please don't write such a misleading comment, cause I know people are not stupid here but maybe just maybe someone will believe you lol, sorry guys for my arrogance but I just really couldn't read that normally.
Uhh... may I suggest to you that maybe, just maybe, you can't read? At all? Not just "this bullshit", everything. Even a simple paragraph or two. You certainly can't read sentences on TnC which has nicely describes your situation.
Second, you're wrong, not every site. Sportsbet is the case on point. You can't apply the same rule of "people under the same address" to every site just because one or two site allowed it. I wonder if you're familiar at all with the sentence, "Their site, their rules?"
But yeah, people here are smart, they can see the facts. How difficult is it just to admit that you made a mistake and should just learn from it, and then move on? If you still can't move on, here's a final friendly advice, a real friendly advice: if you still can't accept this outcome, escalate your case to a third party arbitrator. I think SB is on
CasinoGuru. I'd like to remind you that it'll just further wasting your time, though. Your case is a clean cut case, all the facts are there and admitted by you that you violate their rules. Trust me, if the facts are not like the one happened here --that SB actually did you wrong-- I'm more than happy to chase the case for you. But
you did them wrong, clear as a day, the only thing that could help you is if the SB compliance team got lenient on you and ruled your case as a simple "newbie" misunderstanding. But they didn't, and they have right for it.
Oh, by the way, I think my comparison is dead spot-on.
Edit : look guys on his reference, this guy looks like he is a scammer also, one of many reference according this person : ,,Scamming people, running away after receiving payment for transactions''
I don't know this site and for what reason people are trying to defend scammers being a scammer, but this is showing no respect for the people trying to solve something here and putting their own energy and time writing here some issue.
Now I'm disappointed to who I was answering I just lost my time and energy trying to discuss with such a person -.-
This guy have even a quote under his nickname : ,, Yes, I'm an asshole '' -.-
Hmm... interesting that you brought up my negative feedback, I can't see the one you referred, where --you said and I quote-- ,,Scamming people, running away after receiving payment for transactions'', can you perhaps show me which person leave such feedback to me? But since you brought it up, let's went a little bit out of the thread main topic and discuss my gleaming negative feedback, which I'm a bit proud of... oh, by the way, I saw you gave me one too, thank you for that.
It is accessible for anyone, but I'll just post the screenshot here anyway, so anyone can easily read them.
Now, let's sort it out from the oldest to the newest,
OldBooks, I'm not exactly remember who he is, and why the retaliatory feedback, but a quick
ninjastic search showed me that he got pissed because I'm getting nosy about his bumping service. So, spam or scam or shit poster, or all of them altogether.
xmoneta and
Xmoneta_ICO, ahh yess, this one I remembered very clearly as the photos of the team are still branded on my mind. I don't even need to re-read the reference link --which was my accusation against them-- to remember that two of the team members named Aivar and Aivis, brothers. Bottomline, they're scammers who tried to hit-and-run project, created a project called X-Moneta --IIRC, it was a texting platform, but not sure-- and later wrap it up with their investors money, went radio silence, changed their website to a crypto banking few months later. Their website is inaccesible anymore these days, if I'm not mistaken. So, scam.
michaelpopoola, quite sad he and his friend did not put a reference link, their case is quite interesting, but to sum it up, he made a platform, asked his friends and family for positive and fake reviews. Maybe you're quite familiar with an analogy of mother, brother and dog? Only this time we talked in literal way, minus the dog, add his neighbors and his... priest, if I'm not mistaken. Got caught on it. Anyway, we went back and forth about details of their project, or the lack of it, and the fake reviews, they can't answer them --well, basically because they replied me with anger and most likely misunderstood my question, several times-- and went mad. They're no longer exist, though. So, scam.
Next,
smartcontract100 and
spy100, same person, with hillarious project of "you fund my project and I'll do whatever I want with it. What project, you asked? Ohh, I don't know, whatever I want". So, yeah, not good. Scammers.
Next, we have... oh look at that, you. Hmm... can't say you're a scammer, so I'll leave this one out in the open.
The main bottomline is, every user who left me nagative feedback, it's because they got angry I exposed them. So yeah, you're wrong. Those feedback are not there because I scammed anyone, ever, they're there because I exposed them. I actually wore those red sentences on my feedback page with pride.
Oh, almost forgot, at least you're correct on the very last part of your post,
I am an asshole. Gee-zuz, when would people learn to read? I put it there for the specific reason to warn people and to help them from troubling themselves by telling me that, yet there are handful of people --mostly angry people because the fact didn't work in their favor-- keep informing and mentioning this to me. Let me makeit clear:
I knoooowwww.
p.s.: this post is specifically crafted for you to emphasize my sassiness and my asshole-ness.
I'm quite hungry though, so that might add a tad bit of sassiness level.