Topic: [SCAM WARNING] QI Blockchain Plagiarized Whitepaper and Website Content - page 2. (Read 847 times)

I suggest you all to talk with the team , not with me. I deliver to you what I know .

This is a little bit confusing that at one point you are saying that you have no connection with the QI blockchain but on the same time you are saying that you are a part of the team 
By looking at the post history of yours, i find you a bounty hunter.

No connection, I am part of the team and I am mining the Qie coin.

Does it matter I am jawadu or alt account? If you have power just check IP, location, who care? I just wanted to means why did you report a BM or tag a project as scam just because of it's Plagarism before talking with the project team? This could a project team mistake because as far as I know Qi blockchain project still in the early stage. Even their blockchain explorer not updated yet fully so is not this is normal that the there could be some issue with whitepaper .
And at the end , who care the whitepaper ? People just look to project utility . Just look to Terra luna, what happen with them, what about celcius network? They had security , whitepaper , where are they now?


Anyway, I don't want to have any argue, Just to inform you, new whitepaper with solution will be out tomorrow , I wish to see your investigation on it.

Oh stop the drama LOL
Well honestly speaking a project can be ruined by the third party workers if they do not have work ethic. It's not always easy to find the right person. But I doubt it's the case here.
I see their website homepage and a 12 year kid can design a html page like this. Are they really thinking to crowdfunding using this website?

It will be a big LOL.

That's a classic excuse that we heard so many times before, as its always someone else's mistake and just confirms how clueless QI Blockchain is when they are not capable of writing their own whitepaper, or at least proofread it. If they bothered to do that they would catch that ridiculous mistake that mentions BTC price being ~$250. Either way I can't see how this can end up good and don't expect tags being removed just because you sort the whitepaper.

By the way, what's your connection with QI Blockchain?

Oh, I see. So you're part of the Fox campaigns team or an alt of Jawadu? How am I supposed to know that if you've never mentioned it before?
I guess that explains the fake retaliatory feedback left on my account. You know that's trust abuse, right?



By the way, when did I blame you, and for what exactly?

You are such an egoistic person I seen in this forum and you don't need to know WHO I am. I am sharing with you the update of this project and you are blaming me? What kind of stupidity is it?

You're right. I have no frickin' idea what you're trying to argue here.


So what's your point exactly? You find nothing "tangible" in the OP that this is obvious plagiarism? Or do you mean that even though the project is clearly plagiarized, it can still be "genuine" and honest?

---

Who the hell are you? (with a sarcastic tone)

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

Thank you everyone.

You don't have to be surprised at my stance on this unless you don't get me right.
What I'm saying in essence is that a plagerist is not a scammer and these are two different crimes in the forum. Ironically you would even see a scammer tolling the forum with some few red tags while a plagiarist wouldn't be that lucky. Plagiarism is an offence whose consequence is permanent ban.
My stance on this is; instead of alleging a scam that hasn't even happen and which might not happen, why not project plagiarism and then the account might be banned outrightly.

I see that Jawadu is a bounty manager who might have promoted a scam project before in the forum, so that is not enough to conclude that the QI Blockchain is a scam project, unless you have some reserved evidences which you may want to show the community.

Report in the thread for plagiarism, Report to moderators and then the account might not survive it.

An obvious plagiarism of whitepaper is surely a red flag. A scam project is always hasty to get their project running and hence uses any available tools to set up their platform as fast as possible.

You are constantly asking that if this is a fake project then tell you which is the real project. I think you fail to understand.
To clear things I mean to say that QI Blockchain is the only project and it is a scam. There is no other QI Blockchain project. I hope now it is clear.
Also, if you ask for proof, then there are 99% of projects who have Plagiarized whitepaper, they were scams. Tell me any project which had a Plagiarized white paper and it was a trusted good project?

If you bothered to do check whitepaper with a simple Google search you would find the plagiarism that @FatFork discovered. After all, tools used are irrelevant here as everything is obvious from those screenshots.


Welcome to crypto buddy, majority of projects ARE scam.


An obvious plagiarism is not "tangible" enough for you? Beside, what do you think will happen with a project where team is not capable of writing their own whitepaper and instead they have to copy/paste from someone else's?

This sentence from their whitepaper will show you how mindless team behind QiBlockchain is when they didn't even adjust the BTC price lol and instead they just copy/pasted text. Anyone remembers last time BTC was  at ~$250?

---

Flag supported and nice find FatFork!

I don't use plagiarism detection tools, I don't know where you got that idea from. This is the text compare tool you see in the screenshots, and as you can see, it works perfectly. Learn something about it if you want.


A project that steals content from other projects, even something so simple like content on a website, or even the whole whitepaper, which should be the most important document for any new project, is a fake project. You can find all the evidence in the OP.


Again, I didn't use any plagiarism detection tools, and I don't care if you agree with me or not. That's up to the community to decide. As for the "real project", you can find all the information in the OP. I don't understand what more you want me to prove.


That may actually be true.

---

First of all, I'm surprised with your stance. As a senior member of this community, I think you should know better by now. You say, I might be correct about plagiarism? Please review the evidence first and let me know if I'm wrong about that. I welcome the opportunity to listen to and consider new information and opposing viewpoints, and admit when I am wrong.

Second, we seem to disagree on semantics, so let's get some facts straight. Plagiarizing other people's work without permission or attribution is a deceptive and fraudulent act that is not only detrimental to the community, but it is also illegal, and according to the English dictionary:



So, can you explain to me, in which sense you can call a fraudulent project that steals ideas and content from someone else's work a "genuine" one?

It's not a genuine project. It just copies another project, and tries to fool people into thinking it's something new and innovative when in fact it is neither. Therefore, it's just a scam. And I find it odd that you think this practice is acceptable. It's not. Plagiarism is stealing, and theft is wrong.

I don’t think anything good can come out of the project than scamming investors at the end, a project that can not write their whitepaper on their own, I think they are not really ready for anything serious, a serious project will write their whitepaper theirself, and they won’t plagiarize any project.
@jawadu, you keep on saying that the project have not scammed before, you might be right, but what’s the probability that they won’t scam people later in the future? A project that can copy other projects whitepaper can definitely scam people. I think it will be better if you pause the campaign for now and clear the issue of whitepaper plagiarism.

You might be correct that the whitepaper of the project is plagiarised, but you might be wrong calling the manager of the project a scammer or the project a scam. You provided evidences of plagiarism instead of that of scam. To the best of my knowledge, plagiarism is not equal to scam. You can report the account for plagiarism(which I'm not sure whitepaper plagiarism is among the forum rules). If the evidences are compelling, the account could get banned.
Meanwhile, you lack tangible evidence that the project is a scam, this is because majority of the projects these days doesn't engage professionally whitepaper writers, they go about paraphrasing multiple whitepapers to come out with their own version of garbage.
So, you could reconsider, because I know how frustrating it is for a genuine project struggling to see the light being faced with scam accusations without proves.

Bro, am not blaming but what am saying is that these tools are not to be trusted 100%. I'm a BM and I have used them mostly in checking articles, one tool will give you different results compared to the other (why now?).

Also, you can't just come and say STOP SCAMMING PEOPLE. I have scammed who? and when? Don't just write. You need to have strong proof that this project is fake, commenting here just saying stop scamming without strong proof is nothing! That's the truth.

If the OP will come with proof of the real project that he claimed to be copied by the one we promote, then I will agree with him! But I will never agree with him since he used a plagiarism tool to check the whitepaper and says the project is scam.

If scam was to be checked like that, then a lot of projects would be tagged as scam!

Is that the only proof that this project is fake? I have just asked for one question from the OP, if what I am promoting it's fake then kindly he can share the real project here with us. Don't just check one thing, we need strong proof of what he wrote.


What am trying to say is that many people report us like we are the only ones who got scammed by fake projects in our services which is not true. I hope you got me now, am just speaking the truth but not excuses.

What are you trying to say that this plagiarism software showed the wrong result and using the other one will not detect this plagiarism?
No one is blaming, we are showing the reality of this project. Stop scamming the people.