You're kidding me, right?More than year passed
I replied to your previous post of 2017 the following day so I don't know why are you claiming it took more than a year.
It's internet, baby.
You, yourself, cited the owner of BTC-E as being a friend and clearly he would have been a close enough friend to you that you referenced the fact that not even he 'forced' you to destroy the Novacoins. You have admitted that you worked as a technical consultant for BTC-E, you were a moderator there and your mining pool was an official partner of BTC-E, which also was the primary trading market for your Novacoin cryptocurrency. This is more than a mere "short chat" relationship.
But now you want to try and accuse me of being in the wrong for stating that you have had a direct relationship to BTC-E and its owner, even though the article I posted has you, in your own words, detailing a relationship with the owner of BTC-E as being your friend?
That would make for an interesting legal argument:
"Yes I asserted that the owner of BTC-E was my friend but nobody should have inferred that I meant he was my friend"
So, your claim was false. How unexpected.
Which claim are you saying is false? Please elaborate.