Pages:
Author

Topic: 📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓 - page 27. (Read 65861 times)

sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.
They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.
Yes , the list is getting bigger but new projects like this will have to wait a long time before being listed there.

Isn't ledger limited to 4 or 5 blockchains that you can store?
I think i tried to insert some more coins but that it said that i needed to remove another one if i wanted the new one.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.
They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.
Yes , the list is getting bigger but new projects like this will have to wait a long time before being listed there.
You are right, when this project will be listed at all top exchanges - then there is a chance that they will appear on this device.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.
They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.
Yes , the list is getting bigger but new projects like this will have to wait a long time before being listed there.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.
But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.
Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.

By the way, this is a contingent issue: when we will switch to our proprietary blockchain, we won't be capped by Ethereum gas fee
I still do not understand why gas is so high, I would say unreasonably high comparing to BTC. It should be a lot lower to compete in the market.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.
But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.
Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.

By the way, this is a contingent issue: when we will switch to our proprietary blockchain, we won't be capped by Ethereum gas fee
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.
But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.
Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

Just to be clear: we have accepted an investment of 200$ last week.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.


But its hard to get trust then.


Hi, our conditions are very clear.
The token price is now 0.6$ and is going up to 1.5$ by Feb '19. In case you are a bigger investor we can offer a slightly different deal including shares of our company.
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.


But its hard to get trust then.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 262
me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture


It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.
But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.
They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

For ICO's tokens I prefer to store it all at myetherwallet and use the other wallet that feels more secure to store the mighty bitcoin and ethereum. I never put my tokens on exchage unless I want to sell it directly.

I'm on the same path...
Pages:
Jump to: