Pages:
Author

Topic: Scotland Is Looking to Imprison People for Offensive Tweets - page 3. (Read 5930 times)

hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 509
People have already gotten criminal records in the UK for offensive tweets and Facebook statues, this isn't really anything new.

To me it all depends on the severity. Should you be imprisoned for calling the Prime Minister or Queen a cunt? No. Should you be arrested for making death threats or threatening to rape someone. Quite possibly, yes.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
While I too agree that freedom of speech is more accurately "freedom of opinion and expression" I wouldn't want to forcibly spread my opinion to another country who has the lawful right to decide for themselves what type of government they wish to live under. If enough citizens of said country were willing to request military assistance in order to exercise these rights, I would think it reasonable to offer military assistance to achieve these ends. It's estimated that only 3% of the colonists fought in the Revolutionary war, 3% seems a fair number of a population willing to take the risk of life for liberty to justify actions.

Forcibly asserting our opinion on a population that has no desire or lacks the responsibility to maintain liberty is a waste of life, a waste of time, and a waste of resources.

P.S.
3% doesn't refer to the percentage of the population that desires liberty, it refers to the percentage of the country willing to die for it...

Hello pungopete468,

What I don't understand in your post is what I underlined, what's the differences between country, themselves, government and citizen.

For example we can say that the woman in question is a citizen subject of the Uk, however we can't say that her government represent her (a part if she wants to be self-jailed) as such is she really part of the country?

And there need absolutely 0 legal basis for Freedom of Speech, why because it's a God Given Tool to his Children, use it or don't be. It's not about spreading your opinions, it's like in the case of medicinal drug, be able to visit who ever you want outside of the border of the Empire, without having the risks of being arrested for what ever, who ever wrote on a account pretended to be yours... to high risk to be assumed, I prefer annihilation (and contrary to your opinions it could be a net positive for the USMIIC).

Next step is censoring anyone that would say something bad about the finance (or what ever) of a country? lol... Monster Joke will be called...

What people don't understand about my very aggressive vision of the enemy of America, is that if or when a big incident strike the US mainland, will the enemy show mercy? I don't bet. and I am not alone...

p.s. it must be a life extinction event otherwise... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_military_bases no bet (or no base left uncovered).
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 504
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
Dear NUFCrichard,

I am sorry to vehemently disagree with your line of thought. Spreading hate behind a keyboard, what a utter BS. Since when does any institution has a right to decide what you can or can't say? If you let this privilege for what ever reason, you will have to endure the consequences of your "good intention" fuck that, the truth, you want to make us believe, that because a trashbag write on keyboard, and your super cops (too afraid to go in the street, where the REAL CRIMES happens) will stop him/her it will make the kingdom safer, the truth is that sooner or later it will be used against dissent, political opposition and co. Which path does it lead to?

This is what stupid illiterate in Market Ideologies can't understand, I buy, you sell, we trade, meaning we have diverging opinions without resorting to violence. And if I want, and my seller want, we can discuss of the why he sold and why I bought, which lead us to a peaceful discussion. There is no place for any entity to stop us, and you know why deepsubhumanantifreedomofspeech? You will learn it in blood, the way of the street, I will not remove you the privilege of being teached a one in a lifetime lesson on FoS IRL.

I understand that most gov hate to see 2 people discussing peacefully... why? because we may expose their scams and learn from each others to exploit or profit or flash them... they have to defend, happily, we can make money all ways. And frankly China will move to the US standard sooner that you may even realize, and secondly and more importantly, the group that will defeat the UNITED STATES defender of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, shall be ready to die. Because it's the only outcome that they can realistically expect.

Is it possible to jail a US citizen in Scotland for what he wrote on twitter to a uk resident from the US? I vote for "a little military training over a island chain" if such event occurred.


I understood travel ban because of medicinal drugs, now we have to clear our full written internet log before travelling anywhere? fuck that, air superiority, bomb everything, let the survivors rebuild, let's visit in peace... and if there are no survivors too bad... they should have fought a revolution, but were to weak for it anyway.

Remember safety first.

And if you think that I am amoral, or immoral by my writing... I will just say to you that your brain has been high-jacked by controllers enemy of the United States of America... Open your eyes before you dieTM


legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
The argument for is that people can't spread hate simply by hiding behind a keyboard.
I personally believe in free speech as far as is reasonable.  I have no problem with people abusing celebrities and so on. The authorities have to understand that when someone says something online, they probably don't mean it.  Trolling is a big part of the internet nowadays and it shouldn't be an arrest-able offence.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
I love Asymmetrical Warfare, this one is perfect, we have a girl with lot of supporter vs a state... it's seem asymmetrically rigged against the girl... but read the rest Smiley.

you believe this bs a propos defending the weak? LoL, what a bunch of ignorant you are. I don't believe anything against freedom of speech.

Time to put this brave and opiniated young lady under the full protection of the Imperial American Forces (Darksiders included), and explain the dire consequences that the pieces of trashes that will harass her will endure (it includes but doesn't excludes assisted suicide, exposure of your dirt, "craft"crash, house burning, but if you prefer more legal: blacksite, gitmo, nails... you get the picture), and for the utter piece of trash subhuman pc corrected deep shit anti freedom of speech, it's mean fighting the Forces that Have swear and do by their blood, sacrifice for the defense of the sacred Rights of God, expressed elegantly under the Constitution of the United States of America, and BoR. In short dear FUCKERs of the QUEEN, yes trash hats, it can be dark... and stealth, I don't think that the slaves of the queens have the mean to rebel, and never forget the Sacred Forbidden Square is OURS.

To my friends in said square, if we have to sink carrier England (freedom of speech is inalienable), please, read the memos about evacuations ways, it will safely planned, it will only be temporary (but I can't guarantee a clean place to return, the trails of the Empire Forces...).

Ban from the UK for this post? So be it.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
It isn't anything new no, but we haven't seen a lot of legislation against it yet, they're trying to make moves so they can do blanket surveillance on us.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1267
In Memory of Zepher
People have already gotten criminal records in the UK for offensive tweets and Facebook statues, this isn't really anything new.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Quote
She has also been reported to the police for “hate crimes” against overweight people after making rude remarks about the overweight.

Wait, so overweight people are a 'race' now and need protection? This is getting beyond stupid, look, if people are writing shit about you, don't read it, it's that simple, if they're harassing you directly and not leaving you alone, THEN you can do something about it, it's almost frightening that people out there don't understand what free speech actually means, it would be frightening, if it weren't the fact that people like this would be too stupid and incompetent to get these laws passed an enforced in the first place.

I'm not one of those assholes who will deliberately go out of their way to make fun of people who are fat and whatnot, but if they're in denial and complain about not being able to walk up the stairs and various health problems that revolve around being fat I'm going to say it to their faces.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon



When PC Becomes Dangerous

Scotland’s police are on a mission to stamp out offensive speech by force.

It is Scotland now, but will it one day land on our shores?

Police Scotland and a FOIA request made at the request of the highly respected UK paper The Independent, revealed that police are looking into “offensive” comments online with the express purpose of finding possible criminality.

The police, at the behest of the politically correct crowd, are on a fishing expedition to shut down free speech they don’t like.

The Brits already have Draconian limits to their free speech. Proselytizing on the streets and almost any comment against a Muslim could get you thrown in jail. They don’t have a First Amendment.

We should get down on our knees and thank God that the Founding Fathers included the first ten amendments to the Constitution known as our Bill of Rights.

About 20,000 people in Britain were investigated over the past three years for making insulting comments online; 20 people a day were looked into by law enforcement for criminality, according to a Freedom of Information Act request by The Independent.

Police Scotland’s response to The Independent was, “Please be aware that we will continue to monitor comments on social media and any offensive comments will be investigated.”

Currently, the police in Scotland are investigating a former Apprentice star who stirs up controversy to gain attention on Twitter. Katie Hopkins recently made off-color comments online about a Scottish nurse who contracted Ebola.

She is being investigated for “racist Ebola” tweets with an eye towards arresting her. She chastised the “little sweaty jocks” for “sending us Ebola bombs in the form of sweaty Glaswegians”.

She has also been reported to the police for “hate crimes” against overweight people after making rude remarks about the overweight.

She has almost 300,000 Twitter followers who want to read her outlandish comments because they hate them or love them. She is paid to troll.

A petition from Scotland’s PC crowd demanded her comments be investigated for criminality as “vile, racist tweets.” The police have enthusiastically taken up the cause.

Detective Inspector Glyn Roberts of Police Scotland put it this way: “Inquiries are ongoing into the nature of these tweets and to establish any potential criminality.”

“Police Scotland will thoroughly investigate any reports of offensive or criminal behavior online and anyone found to be responsible will be robustly dealt with.”

The PC crowd has law enforcement on their side and their goal is to silence “offensive” opinions by force. Idiocy could put a person in jail.

Who will decide who is offensive? The PC crowd will decide.

The police have no business investigating annoying comments but they are.

It’s Shariah law for Westerners.


http://www.independentsentinel.com/scotland-is-looking-to-imprison-people-for-offensive-tweets/?utm_content=bufferc94f3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming soon to all Europe...

Pages:
Jump to: