Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 258. (Read 750572 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
July 29, 2015, 01:40:58 PM
Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!

I've seen this argument used before, but don't know of any actual examples.
Most "FUD spreading morons" could be silenced quite quickly by logical answers to reasonable questions.

The FUD morons here waste all their time and going around in circles, they have nothing more to do. I found the ignor button and that works well. I can not complain about scrypt, also no problems with login pin etc. and when the khs got stuck in the market the next day it was available again.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 29, 2015, 01:32:14 PM
Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!

Yeah right, interwebs trolls make criminals out of honest people Grin

"Shit, this anonymous person on this nerd forum is saying mean things about me so I better steal everyone's money. That'll teach'em."


legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
July 29, 2015, 01:31:07 PM


THE REAL DEAL

Someone sent this to me so I am passing it on; it is a very interesting read - they obviously put a lot of work into it so I thought I should put it up.  If you have any interest in the future of scrypt.cc, for or against, give it a think.  It is a new perspective, and one that is undoubtedly closer to reality than what most are claiming on this board, for and against.

http://pastebin.com/sY2viGps


Quote
As for the mining hardware aspect - F2Pool has 441 Ghs of LTC mining power as we speak - there is little doubt that scrypt.cc is doing most of its mining via F2Pool, using multiple IPs.


Little doubts? That a Brazilian Scrypt mining farm which has sold 500GH of supposed hash power would be mining through a Chinese mining pool which predominantly mines with its own hardware?

How on earth did he come to that bizarre conclusion?

Quote
The LTC network has over 100 000 Ghs in total, so it is possible that scrypt.cc is responsible for a sizeable portion.  

No, it has over 1000 GHs, not 100,000

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
July 29, 2015, 01:28:17 PM
Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!

I've seen this argument used before, but don't know of any actual examples.
Most "FUD spreading morons" could be silenced quite quickly by logical answers to reasonable questions.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
July 29, 2015, 01:27:44 PM
Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!

LMAO, Admin has not got a hard life at all. You make it easy for him, defending the scam. Not much effort required to not fix anything and leaving the site in a permanent state of disarray.
All he has to do is cash in every now and then. Well done you.  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
July 29, 2015, 01:25:43 PM
Look how the price is crashing obvious that some people got scammed by that email
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
July 29, 2015, 01:18:45 PM
Even with a legit internet based business there are so much FUD spreding morons creating problems that the owner of the business might think to cash in and disappear instead of heaving a hard life Trying to do its best. It's not easy!
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 29, 2015, 12:49:10 PM


THE REAL DEAL

Someone sent this to me so I am passing it on; it is a very interesting read - they obviously put a lot of work into it so I thought I should put it up.  If you have any interest in the future of scrypt.cc, for or against, give it a think.  It is a new perspective, and one that is undoubtedly closer to reality than what most are claiming on this board, for and against.

http://pastebin.com/sY2viGps


Nice essay for someone clinging to hope that this is somehow at least partially a legit operation. Why would a legit operation try so hard to look like a scam then?

Every major Bitcoin heist from Gox to Garza has had enough supporters and bagholders to come up with rationalizations even when the perpetrators themselves don't care anymore to keep the appearances.

Eventually it will sink in, just takes a bit of time.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
July 29, 2015, 12:37:04 PM


That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.
[/quote]

Me, too.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 29, 2015, 12:13:33 PM
Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

You do realize that this isn't from SCC, right?
Where does the link send you?
You can easily hijack the "from" of an email so it looks that it was send from that adress but it wasn't. Just do a little research. I don't know how it's named in english, but there is a way. I think this email is originally from [email protected] or so and the from shows "[email protected]". Getting tons of Spam Email where this is done.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
July 29, 2015, 12:09:22 PM
Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

You do realize that this isn't from SCC, right?
Where does the link send you?
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 29, 2015, 12:00:10 PM
Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail

Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.

Minimimum is 0.002BTC
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
July 29, 2015, 11:52:54 AM
Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)

Hey man! The minim Cashout is 0.01Btc.

Guys caution suspicious mail
http://i61.tinypic.com/28a58x0.jpg
Fuck Marcelo Santos big scammer.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 29, 2015, 11:35:14 AM
Here is my recent withdrawal. Took not longer than an hour. https://blockchain.info/tx/6971a2a5d64433b6638e574142b4988d632de3adeb548343257fe2275e274633
(0.00134044 BTC)
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
July 29, 2015, 10:59:52 AM

One day you have 300 BTC and  the other day you wake up with 80BTC, that is scrypt.cc


How is that different than any other stock market on the planet ?  We are not really dealing with a blue chip stock here.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
July 29, 2015, 10:31:32 AM
You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.


That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.

and dissapearing with no communication ....
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
July 29, 2015, 10:27:28 AM
You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.


That's all very possible but what is the explanation for not being able to recover accounts. I have been waiting a month or so now waiting to recover what is mine.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 29, 2015, 10:14:06 AM
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

I don't really need you answering for me, but whatever. According to "admin" it's 1500BTC. Do you not trust admin?

http://sccstats.com/admin-history
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11687621

There are some addresses in there too, feel free to research.

Now 1500 BTC might take between 6-9 days to earn on 850 GH/s, depending on the power consumption. The "hack" happened more than a month ago.

Any wants to take a guess as to when scrypt.cc will go back to payouts matching actual LTC profitability?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
July 29, 2015, 09:37:45 AM
You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.

1500 BTC

Easy to find out.
I watched the hotwallet while they cleaned it.

People still believe he has 850 GH/s. Hilarious.

Every halfbrain see that this is a (partial) Ponzi.
Yes, he mine. But at the most with 200 GH/s.
And that's a very good-natured estimate.
Especially since this corresponds roughly to the drops in the LTC Hashrate.

The remaining payouts will be paid in advance by the members.
Just observe a couple of days the Hotwallet. It's really not hard.

It is undoubtedly for the most part a Ponzi.

But do not get me wrong, this is not a criticism.
The system worked perfectly up to a certain point.
And the hack was real. We found the old pre-hack Server. Still running.

The Admin has no reason to continue to run it. Besides, he has no more control over it.

This semi-Ponzi could have run years without any problems.
Even without anyone would have made losses in the end.

The low rewards have only one reason at the moment:
Not enough deposits.

If he set the rewards up to 100%, many people would cash out.
and the system would collaps.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
July 29, 2015, 09:32:40 AM
So no one got their money back? Huh

I get paid like clockwork.

Now LTC is over 4 $ so I think reward must be around 20 or more

[...]

I don't think it is a ponzi Admin is only a thief.

"Only a thief" ? Smiley

All problems with "farm move" and "hacks" happened as LTC value started to climb up. For a real Scrypt mining farm this would have been a massive windfall. The loss from the "hack" would have been recovered in a few days with their 500 or 850 GH/s or whatever.

If you prefer to think that he's "only a thief" that's fine but Occam's razor tells us that scrypt.cc is not mining.

You're claiming they could have recovered the coins that were stolen in the hack in a few days.
Do you know how much was stolen in the hack?
Answer is no.
Jump to: