Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 282.

rrocket66

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: ValleyOfTheWolves on July 16, 2015, 04:40:20 PM

thnx to cryptodevil and crengiston im buyin cheap khs
And by the way roi is still better then other cloudmining websites

Buh buh buh maths and net hash. Derpa derpa. You are ruining crypto. Im gonna tell mommy on you. I am going to include you in this imaginary class action lawsuit that would cost more than all my current assets to fund.... Please understand I'm joking. I did look into his buying this brand new great coin called (insert forced ad here) you should look at it. It is better than scam.cc. Smh

ValleyOfTheWolves

sr. member

Activity: 391

Merit: 250

thnx to cryptodevil and crengiston im buyin cheap khs
And by the way roi is still better then other cloudmining websites

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: Soylent_Green on July 16, 2015, 03:15:06 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on July 16, 2015, 02:56:03 PM

Lol, sure, sounds legit.

Quote from: litecoinpool.com/pools

How precise is this data?
Hash rate estimates are based on the rate at which blocks are solved, so the precision is relatively low. Errors of a few GH/s should be regarded as normal. (Standard deviation for the total hash rate estimate above: 57 GH/s.)

Really. THAT is your response? A quote from the site?
Not even some of your infallible math? disappointing.

Please give yourself a little more effort.
I expect at least 500 words. As usual.

LAWL, the butthurt is strong in this one.

Crestington

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1024

Quote from: rrocket66 on July 16, 2015, 12:09:40 PM

Quote from: giveen on July 16, 2015, 08:08:06 AM

I think those charts are a bit off. I moderate at WeMineLTC, and we are reporting 17.6GH/s for our traffic.

Careful your logic might crash and burn his little brain. He can't wrap his head around the fact that an "estimated net hash" is not a firm number. It is a number derived from block times and difficulty. Not the other way around. He has an agenda, who knows what it is. He is a lonely child that needs this attention we give him to feel important.

I await a snarky, WELL thought out, response from the elite crypto folks as I send this poolside. hahaha.

Your beloved admin needs to come here and prove everything such as identity, mining stats (past and present), mining farm, and all payouts. If he was in fact mining with all that hashrate then he could prove it cryptographically and mathematically and because he can't and won't, it makes Scrypt.cc a

SCAM.

You have no idea what you are talking about and are only making assumptions, only the person running the operation could prove it beyond reasonable doubt.

Soylent_Green

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptodevil on July 16, 2015, 02:56:03 PM

Lol, sure, sounds legit.

Quote from: litecoinpool.com/pools

How precise is this data?
Hash rate estimates are based on the rate at which blocks are solved, so the precision is relatively low. Errors of a few GH/s should be regarded as normal. (Standard deviation for the total hash rate estimate above: 57 GH/s.)

Really. THAT is your response? A quote from the site?
Not even some of your infallible math? disappointing.

Please give yourself a little more effort.
I expect at least 500 words. As usual.

cryptodevil

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 1254

Thread-puller extraordinaire

Quote from: Soylent_Green on July 16, 2015, 12:25:29 PM

So around 43% less. (distribution chart say 10 GH/s)
Applied to the entire Hashrate this might as well be around 1834 GH/s max.
right?

Lol, sure, sounds legit.

Quote from: litecoinpool.com/pools

How precise is this data?
Hash rate estimates are based on the rate at which blocks are solved, so the precision is relatively low. Errors of a few GH/s should be regarded as normal. (Standard deviation for the total hash rate estimate above: 57 GH/s.)

giveen

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Soylent_Green on July 16, 2015, 12:25:29 PM

Quote from: giveen on July 16, 2015, 08:08:06 AM

I think those charts are a bit off. I moderate at WeMineLTC, and we are reporting 17.6GH/s for our traffic.

So around 43% less. (distribution chart say 10 GH/s)
Applied to the entire Hashrate this might as well be around 1834 GH/s max.
right?

I'm not saying the numbers add up perfectly. Just saying there is some discrepancies from using that chart.
At the time I looked at the chart, it was reporting WeMineLTC at 7GH when I looked at the website, it was 17.6GH

Soylent_Green

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: giveen on July 16, 2015, 08:08:06 AM

I think those charts are a bit off. I moderate at WeMineLTC, and we are reporting 17.6GH/s for our traffic.

So around 43% less. (distribution chart say 10 GH/s)
Applied to the entire Hashrate this might as well be around 1834 GH/s max.
right?

rrocket66

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: giveen on July 16, 2015, 08:08:06 AM

I think those charts are a bit off. I moderate at WeMineLTC, and we are reporting 17.6GH/s for our traffic.

Careful your logic might crash and burn his little brain. He can't wrap his head around the fact that an "estimated net hash" is not a firm number. It is a number derived from block times and difficulty. Not the other way around. He has an agenda, who knows what it is. He is a lonely child that needs this attention we give him to feel important.

I await a snarky, WELL thought out, response from the elite crypto folks as I send this poolside. hahaha.

ThePhwner

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

something something Bitcoin

Quote from: ?? on ??

No one has also mentioned that it's possible marcelo might actually be mining BTC instead with btc mining gear, not scrypt.

Which would make the statements "does not have 850 ghs of scrypt mining" technically true. After all this is a pretty shady operation.

LIke I said many pages ago, just cash out a profit, and then if you want to gamble with a small profit, stay in.

I sleep great at night because of this.

Good luck.

PS. rewards are NEVER coming back. Get over it. The current KHS prices reflect this. It sucks but oh well, what you going to do.

So you're asserting he's actually running a SHA mining operation and disguising it as Scrypt? Excuse me while I LOL for a few minutes.

Soylent_Green

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: Orhan1337 on July 16, 2015, 11:45:53 AM

This must be their hot wallet right?
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1HWqsgnSd12Gv8SpoUMi1Cj8hp79BTSpW7

Final balance shows $2.9k pretty low unless they changed their hot wallet.

It changed weeks ago
https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ

Orhan1337

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

This must be their hot wallet right?
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1HWqsgnSd12Gv8SpoUMi1Cj8hp79BTSpW7

Final balance shows $2.9k pretty low unless they changed their hot wallet.

D4RK5T4R

sr. member

Activity: 379

Merit: 250

Quote from: maokoto on July 16, 2015, 09:12:28 AM

If the rewards are not increasing, it is likely because people have still many khs in their power, and there is no money to pay them for the mining. Raising rewards would add to that problem.

What? just what?

Surely if the site was mining then there would be enough to pay users the correct rewards based on their khs, but as we know it isn't it explains why your rewards are so low.

CanariAnali

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: maokoto on July 16, 2015, 09:12:28 AM

Quote from: CanariAnali on July 16, 2015, 09:01:29 AM

But if I would be the scammer!
I would buy 2,000 BTC in KHS back
Bring the rewards back to the level of 1 month ago
Sell all the KHS again ( made 4,000 BTC minimum, over 1 mill dollars)
Drop the rewards again and maybe start over on a later date.

I also remember at the power issue that withdraws were still in place while the deposit wallet went over 5,000 BTC which values over a mil dollars. Money is clearly there.

You might be right about mining BTC but who gives a shit.... As long as my beer money is there every day until I stop drinking :p

But, if you brought the rewards back, you would have to pay the higher rewards. Perhaps it would not compensate.

If the rewards are not increasing, it is likely because people have still many khs in their power, and there is no money to pay them for the mining. Raising rewards would add to that problem.

I agree with the "beer money" part. The rewards, though reduced, are still Ok for me to get some satoshis everyday without doing nothing. Perhaps it is even better, as it will be more sustainable this way.

Thanks, maybe so and here a sample of take the ride
With the high rewards you had 1 BTC in KHS
With the low rewards you bought an extra 2 to have similar income so 3 BTC in KHS
Let's say rewards going up and following
If the KHS goes up to 500 / KHS you sell KHS for 1 BTC
If goes up to 750 / KHS you sell KHS for 2 BTC
If goes up to 1,000 you are very lucky.....
And reversed,
and if the site closes down just stop drinking beer.
Long Live Beer :0

maokoto

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

✪ NEXCHANGE | BTC, LTC, ETH & DOGE ✪

Quote from: CanariAnali on July 16, 2015, 09:01:29 AM

But if I would be the scammer!
I would buy 2,000 BTC in KHS back
Bring the rewards back to the level of 1 month ago
Sell all the KHS again ( made 4,000 BTC minimum, over 1 mill dollars)
Drop the rewards again and maybe start over on a later date.

I also remember at the power issue that withdraws were still in place while the deposit wallet went over 5,000 BTC which values over a mil dollars. Money is clearly there.

You might be right about mining BTC but who gives a shit.... As long as my beer money is there every day until I stop drinking :p

But, if you brought the rewards back, you would have to pay the higher rewards. Perhaps it would not compensate.

If the rewards are not increasing, it is likely because people have still many khs in their power, and there is no money to pay them for the mining. Raising rewards would add to that problem.

I agree with the "beer money" part. The rewards, though reduced, are still Ok for me to get some satoshis everyday without doing nothing. Perhaps it is even better, as it will be more sustainable this way.

CanariAnali

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

No one has also mentioned that it's possible marcelo might actually be mining BTC instead with btc mining gear, not scrypt.

Which would make the statements "does not have 850 ghs of scrypt mining" technically true. After all this is a pretty shady operation.

LIke I said many pages ago, just cash out a profit, and then if you want to gamble with a small profit, stay in.

I sleep great at night because of this.

Good luck.

PS. rewards are NEVER coming back. Get over it. The current KHS prices reflect this. It sucks but oh well, what you going to do.

Love the post, this is how I think about it.

But if I would be the scammer!
I would buy 2,000 BTC in KHS back
Bring the rewards back to the level of 1 month ago
Sell all the KHS again ( made 4,000 BTC minimum, over 1 mill dollars)
Drop the rewards again and maybe start over on a later date.

I also remember at the power issue that withdraws were still in place while the deposit wallet went over 5,000 BTC which values over a mil dollars. Money is clearly there.

You might be right about mining BTC but who gives a shit.... As long as my beer money is there every day until I stop drinking :p

giveen

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: ?? on ??

No one has also mentioned that it's possible marcelo might actually be mining BTC instead with btc mining gear, not scrypt.

Which would make the statements "does not have 850 ghs of scrypt mining" technically true. After all this is a pretty shady operation.

LIke I said many pages ago, just cash out a profit, and then if you want to gamble with a small profit, stay in.

I sleep great at night because of this.

Good luck.

PS. rewards are NEVER coming back. Get over it. The current KHS prices reflect this. It sucks but oh well, what you going to do.

I highly doubt that he is mining BTC. He has stated that he is mining with 500GH/s.
500GH/s of BTC would make this a total obvious scam.

Tathata

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: D4RK5T4R on July 16, 2015, 08:31:12 AM

We need a whole new definition now.

Scryptard = One who has been involved with the scam and continues to disbelieve the facts.

Scrypturd = One who is involved with vehemently defending the scam.

You know the beauty of it is we need each other. Thanks brother. EDIT... or sister?

D4RK5T4R

sr. member

Activity: 379

Merit: 250

We need a whole new definition now.

Scryptard = One who has been involved with the scam and continues to disbelieve the facts.

Scrypturd = One who is involved with vehemently defending the scam.

ThePhwner

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

something something Bitcoin

Quote from: cryptodevil on July 16, 2015, 07:48:33 AM

Quote from: Tathata on July 16, 2015, 07:45:34 AM

Again, you are right about hash rate not being able to hide but it can be turned off and on and clearly visible wile doing so as unknown. The unknown on litcoinpool just shows the on part of unknown hashes not the "hiding" off hashes.

Show me where the 'Unknown' amount is increasing beyond a few dozen GH.

I routinely check that figure and it is the Chinese pools mostly adding the extra hashrate to the total LTC network amount.

I keep asking them to show exchange volumes where the 850 Gh/s of mined coins are being sold and they won't even acknowledge that point. Hysterical.

And to clarify it is 850 Gh/s. Marcello has repeatedly claimed he has 500 Gh/s for sale and another 350 Gh/s mining for his partners. It's absolutely not possible to hide that amount of Scrypt hash. And the notion that it's in a single datacenter is fucking hilarious.

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 282. (Read 750609 times)