Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 320. (Read 750572 times)

It looks pretty stable to me.

The site now is very unstable!
I suggest you to stay away at least until the situation will get better

Also even if he has 1kh mining hes mining ponder that lie.

If you take the path of willful ignorance in this case you can make that argument. You continue to take the stance of "we don't know what we don't know," except that we do know a lot, and the end fact is that there's no mining and the entire premise of Scrypt.CC is a lie. Your attitude here is the reason for the phrase "ignorance is bliss." Good luck with your philosophy and semantics. A ponzi based on a lie is still a ponzi based on a lie.

Nope a coin has two sides .

You're so very oblivious... what farm? Where's the hashrate? A video of some fucking miners doesn't even matter at this point, because he can't prove he's mining anything. I could leave right now, and in 3 hours have a video from a generic data center I could use to "prove mining" to you Scryptards. However, if network rates can't back it up, so what? No mining = no mining.

The only reason there's a "flip side to the coin" is because you want or need to believe something that isn't real so you don't feel like the dumb fuckhead you are for investing in this mess. Why not go start a new religion if you want people to ignore fact for faith? You'd make a hell of a lot of money that way too.

There is a flip side to the coin always. We just don't know with 100% certainty how scc is doing it. You can believe to have the best hand and clam "ponzi" until all cards are shown we just don't know. So the gamble will continue, that's life. Bet a lot of you would shat yourself if scc finally came out and did a full detail video on the farm. This may be the way scc likes to roll it sure does get noticed when no proof of mining even if in a bad way.

You PQ's are hysterical. You're still willing to believe that *somehow* it's possible to have this amount of secret Scrypt hash, and that it pays enough to give you guys payouts and 5% of all your referrals' earnings too. You're not pointing out "facts" or even things that "could be possible." It has been shown to you in factual terms that there is no way Marcelo Santos, or anyone else, is mining with 850 Gh/s or 1 Th/s of Scrypt power than cannot be accounted for on any networks. Unless they are mining a coin only known to them and not sold anywhere, which I think we can agree is probably not happening.

Here's an interesting comparison:

65 LTCGear users filed a class action against Chris aka Beekeeper. The number of shares in LTCGear held by those 65 users alone works out to 1.307 Th/s:

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=26244.msg275023#msg275023

which would double the current Litecoin network hashrate if it was real. Let's assume that was the entirety of LTCGear, for the sake of argument. In reality, the true figures are probably exponentially larger than this w/rt to LTCGear shares and represented hashrate.

Now do your research: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-ltc.html

Has the LTC network ever been 2.5 Th/s? Did the LTC network lose half of its hashrate when Gear stopped paying out? Is this magical multiple Th/s of Scrypt power hiding itself on the same unknown coin networks Marcelo Santos uses? Or is it another example of made up Ponzi bullshit?

Fact is, you can't hide a large mining operation, and likewise, you can't claim one exists when network stats and trading volumes say otherwise.

I could also care less if he has what he has claimed to said he has. Just pointing out facts it can be possible numbers don't lie or even exaggerate.

What? That seems SO UNLIKELY? I mean I just saw they were offering 40% off as part of a promo... there's NO WAY they planned it to get extra BTC deposits then run off... is there?

LOL. Obvious ponzi is always obvious.

EDIT: Why am I not surprised that their thread is full of the same PQ's that so fervently defend Scam.CC?

See this is why we call you "Scryptards."

We have been over this point numerous times, with facts. Yes there is over 1 Th/s on LTC. But it does not belong to Marcelo Santos nor does any significant portion of it. Yes there is over 1 Th/s on Doge because it's merge mined with LTC. And again, little to none of this belongs to Marcelo Santos.

Cryptodevil has gone through the math and shown that if you take out LTC and look at the remaining top 20 Scrypt coins, the network rates combined are not even 50 Gh/s. Then consider liquidating these coins on the market. Say Marcelo is using 100 Gh/s to mine some shitcoin and mines a whole fucking ton of it. Who in the hell is going to buy it, and at a price that makes it MORE profitable than LTC/Doge merge mining?

Children pay attention: YOU CANNOT HIDE 850 Gh/s OF SCRYPT HASH.

And really if he has it, it should be a TRIVIAL fucking task to show some block stats from whatever he's mining, yea?

EDIT: SYS and VIA are also merge mined so those network hashrates are also largely irrelevant to any claims of "other coins being mined."

Not all LTC pools merge mine Doge and Doge is merge mined with some non LTC coins. That being said, most of the Doge network hash rate is coming from LTC merge mining as most of the big LTC pools do it.

More GH to calculate into equations: from coinwarz.... it is possible to have a ton of TH in scrypt.

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency?sort=hashrate&dir=desc

Scyptards just look out this https://youtu.be/zjtLszt7MTo and... 

im not arguing by the way just doing my own research
i should of said i was using wisdom and coin warz to compare

Scryptards...... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA  +1000000000000 

ah i see!
so im curious every time i try to get a reading of the doge network rate and the ltc network rate they are always different and by a good 250 gh ish give or take, dont hold me to it! but they always read different. ive tried reading from multiple sources

Here, let me bring you up to speed with the actual facts:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

There is no room in the entire Scrypt coin network for 850Gh of unknown miners that aren't already accounted for. Mathematical proof is there.

They are lying about having 850Gh of Scrypt miners, they are lying about having 500Gh of Scrypt mining, the 500Gh they have already sold to scryptards. Does this sound like the actions of a viable investment scheme?

since a lot of people are trading a lot there, that does not mean too much, but still i nice chunk of BTC.