Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 336. (Read 750572 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
bitcoin supporter
July 02, 2015, 07:51:02 AM
Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.

Wrong! it's not celebration.

People should mock and bully viciously complete anonymous sites to prevent people losing money.
This kind of sites giving bad name for bitcoin.



Everybody that invested here in Scrypt.CC either knew it was a ponzi and were willing to take a risk or were uneducated crazy noobs that got a lesson they deserve and that will serve them in future Wink

All this from a guy that quite happy promotes gambling. So in saying that it must be everyone that loses at that casino deserves it.

At least the people going into the casino know what's going on. It's not a secret that every time you bet $100 on a roulette wheel you should expect to lose $5.26. There is a big difference between that and buying hashpower that doesn't exist.

Yes I trade soccer bets and stand on real facts.
Leonel Messi is real, Ronaldo, FC Barcelona, Fifa, world cup is real.
But khs is not real, just virtual numbers fakes you feel like you're owning something.
nobody seen Marcelo and his mining rigs. no photo, no address.

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
July 02, 2015, 07:38:32 AM

Well deposits are not working and admin has clearly stated this several times not to make deposits.  If this was a Ponzi about to make a run for it, why on earth would they say NO DEPOSITS PLEASE!!



The reason he does not want any more deposits is because he is now in the "cooling the mark off" process.
If he was to leave registration open for new users, then the users that have been silenced for trying to make it clear that he has scammed everyone would be able to make a new account to continue to call admin out.
This would be bad for the cooling period, so he just silences/bans/deletes any naysayers and then they have no option to communicate on the site.
Admin is obviously watching the chat, as I have had 3 accounts silenced there since the "trading" (I use the term loosely laughingly) was turned back on.
Two of those accounts have now also been totally deleted. This does not happen on its own people, admin has done it.
So, if admin is there, silencing certain accounts, ask yourselves why he has made no announcements in the trollbox, anywhere on the site or on this thread?

Answers on the back of a postcard please......



The other possibility is that while he was planning his exit he really did get hacked... the security on that site and the site itself were pure shit through and through. Could be that hackers really did gain control of deposit wallets and this just provided a nice vehicle for the rest of the closing act. Really who the hell knows why he orchestrated it this way. People have been asking the same questions for months about LTCGear: Why keep the site up? Why keep providing ETAs? Why keep giving 'updates' when chances of being paid are next to none?

Hopefully the lesson here is skepticism on the front end of an investment, not when you're double-digit BTC deep and it starts to go tits up. It's important to remember that if it seems too good to be true it probably is, and that anyone who claims to be mining can prove it relatively easily if they are.
sr. member
Activity: 484
Merit: 251
July 02, 2015, 07:36:18 AM
I already posted this in another thread:
1) It is highly unlikely someone could make such a huge mining farm in Brazil because of import tax on electronics and huge electricity price. He could steal energy/use solar panel and avoid taxes in a small scale, but that big would be nearly impossible
2) Marcelo Santos is a very very generic name. Marcelo  is one of the top 10 first names, and Santos is one of top 3 surnames. I doubt that is his actual name and I doubt he is even brazilian. He is probably american or russian and is using that country to hide his identity.

Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.
I really hope everything works well. If it goes wrong I surely will not blame the victims, but the perpetrator.
I posted these several times in multiple threads and not one person has replied or quoted.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
July 02, 2015, 06:55:42 AM
Roll Eyes
Wow. Exhausting catching up on 5 days of posts, a lot of decent points and a lot of useless negative energy being put up here. I for one am under the impression that it's become obvious of fraud (and it's not due to the 850gh argument, although it's valid.) It's because of this:
Naysayers,  in the beginning of his updates, Marcelo stated mining wouldn't cease, it would continue to recoup losses...well, if mining never stopped, and each account is still mining....

1.Why can't anyone mine yet 12+ hrs after the lockout has been lifted  (except him)?
2.Where are MY rewards?
3.In whose possesion are the rewards?

Not in my account,  what about you guys?  Let's say hypothetically that he didn't rob all users blind with the alleged "hack". If he doesn't return all rewards from the past week then he has stolen them, from everybody. Face it, at the very least he's jacked all of our mining power since the site went down for his own, UNLESS I get them all back, AND the deposit I made 20 minutes before the crash...
I also made a deposit MINUTES before the hack. Nowhere to be found - aka vanished.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
July 02, 2015, 06:53:21 AM
Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.

Wrong! it's not celebration.

People should mock and bully viciously complete anonymous sites to prevent people losing money.
This kind of sites giving bad name for bitcoin.



Everybody that invested here in Scrypt.CC either knew it was a ponzi and were willing to take a risk or were uneducated crazy noobs that got a lesson they deserve and that will serve them in future Wink

All this from a guy that quite happy promotes gambling. So in saying that it must be everyone that loses at that casino deserves it.

At least the people going into the casino know what's going on. It's not a secret that every time you bet $100 on a roulette wheel you should expect to lose $5.26. There is a big difference between that and buying hashpower that doesn't exist.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
July 02, 2015, 06:30:20 AM

Well deposits are not working and admin has clearly stated this several times not to make deposits.  If this was a Ponzi about to make a run for it, why on earth would they say NO DEPOSITS PLEASE!!



The reason he does not want any more deposits is because he is now in the "cooling the mark off" process.
If he was to leave registration open for new users, then the users that have been silenced for trying to make it clear that he has scammed everyone would be able to make a new account to continue to call admin out.
This would be bad for the cooling period, so he just silences/bans/deletes any naysayers and then they have no option to communicate on the site.
Admin is obviously watching the chat, as I have had 3 accounts silenced there since the "trading" (I use the term loosely laughingly) was turned back on.
Two of those accounts have now also been totally deleted. This does not happen on its own people, admin has done it.
So, if admin is there, silencing certain accounts, ask yourselves why he has made no announcements in the trollbox, anywhere on the site or on this thread?

Answers on the back of a postcard please......

newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 06:08:35 AM
Ey, look what I found in one of these boxes, the last Scrypt.cc hardware miner

http://i60.tinypic.com/30c4pkh.jpg
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 05:34:52 AM
Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.

Wrong! it's not celebration.

People should mock and bully viciously complete anonymous sites to prevent people losing money.
This kind of sites giving bad name for bitcoin.



Everybody that invested here in Scrypt.CC either knew it was a ponzi and were willing to take a risk or were uneducated crazy noobs that got a lesson they deserve and that will serve them in future Wink

All this from a guy that quite happy promotes gambling. So in saying that it must be everyone that loses at that casino deserves it.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 504
July 02, 2015, 05:11:47 AM
^^^ Which is *exactly* the kind of post, 'Admin' wants to see going up during this 'cooling the mark' process.

Whatever you lose it is your fault for believing in what he told you and, besides, you can think of it as the cost of a valuable lesson in life, etc. etc. and so forth.

Let's see a few more, "never invest more than you can afford to lose" posts, please. These criminal operators love to see plenty of those posts go up too, along with "hey I saw it as just a gamble" kind of thing, with the option to add in a few variations such as comparing it to regular gambling where you do actually know what the odds are and, more importantly, what the game is and, of course we can't forget, The Stock Market, where you can claim this criminal enterprise to have been more akin to the 'pink sheets', right, amirite?



The best is:
I ROI'd several times so anything now is just a bonus.

Like that makes it all OK  Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
July 02, 2015, 04:45:42 AM
^^^ Which is *exactly* the kind of post, 'Admin' wants to see going up during this 'cooling the mark' process.

Whatever you lose it is your fault for believing in what he told you and, besides, you can think of it as the cost of a valuable lesson in life, etc. etc. and so forth.

Let's see a few more, "never invest more than you can afford to lose" posts, please. These criminal operators love to see plenty of those posts go up too, along with "hey I saw it as just a gamble" kind of thing, with the option to add in a few variations such as comparing it to regular gambling where you do actually know what the odds are and, more importantly, what the game is and, of course we can't forget, The Stock Market, where you can claim this criminal enterprise to have been more akin to the 'pink sheets', right, amirite?

newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 04:39:59 AM


Everybody that invested here in Scrypt.CC either knew it was a ponzi and were willing to take a risk or were uneducated crazy noobs that got a lesson they deserve and that will serve them in future Wink
[/quote]


+1000000000000000000000000000000
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 02, 2015, 04:22:38 AM
Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.

Wrong! it's not celebration.

People should mock and bully viciously complete anonymous sites to prevent people losing money.
This kind of sites giving bad name for bitcoin.



Everybody that invested here in Scrypt.CC either knew it was a ponzi and were willing to take a risk or were uneducated crazy noobs that got a lesson they deserve and that will serve them in future Wink
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
bitcoin supporter
July 02, 2015, 03:59:46 AM
Well guys, don't pull out your champagne just yet to celebrate our misery, the site is up, but slow, so things are looking good.  You are sad little people to be so happy at someone else losing money.

Wrong! it's not celebration.

People should mock and bully viciously complete anonymous sites to prevent people losing money.
This kind of sites giving bad name for bitcoin.

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 03:39:39 AM
It looks like they have problems with the email server, so that's why the site stays in lock down.
Right... and what does that have to do with anything?

You can't withdraw without email server. I think everything will be ok. I have 15m Khs and am confident it will sort its self out.

Really? Please explain why?

Seriously guys, you need to wake up.
If scrypt.cc had any legitimacy then admin would have at least posted a message explaining why things have not gone as previously announced.
Instead, many users that have stated the site is a scam in the TB have been silenced  or even had their account deleted, who did that I wonder? surely not admin? /sarcasm Wink
Can you not see that this is just part of cooling the marks down?


http://41.media.tumblr.com/4075f434af8661a3d660cd66a514f8fa/tumblr_mlzfs1jali1s73a2oo1_500.jpg


Take a deep breath and move on.


I guess ppl would believe in just about anything. Everybody needs reason even a crappy one.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
July 02, 2015, 03:31:11 AM
Seriously guys, you need to wake up.
If scrypt.cc had any legitimacy then admin would have at least posted a message explaining why things have not gone as previously announced.
Instead, many users that have stated the site is a scam in the TB have been silenced  or even had their account deleted, who did that I wonder? surely not admin? /sarcasm Wink
Can you not see that this is just part of cooling the marks down?





Take a deep breath and move on.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 03:26:24 AM
It looks like they have problems with the email server, so that's why the site stays in lock down.
Right... and what does that have to do with anything?

You can't withdraw without email server. I think everything will be ok. I have 15m Khs and am confident it will sort its self out.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
July 02, 2015, 02:55:37 AM
It looks like they have problems with the email server, so that's why the site stays in lock down.
Right... and what does that have to do with anything?
Jump to: