Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 347. (Read 750572 times)

Scrypt.cc ist a knowed Ponzi or not ? And scrypt.cc make Advertising of badbitcoin.org, i can don´t trust badcoin.org...

Declaration of Interests. We have personal and project investments in Scrypt.cc

[...] also in Paycoin (XPY) and Hashstakers. We would not invest in anything we considered to be a Ponzi or Scam.

they are on badlist of badbitcoin.org  . I dont see any reason what you mean by your post, why this should be related with scrypt.cc .. ?

Most users here are adults, we don't need warnings.
We can make decisions ourselves.
We don't need you shoving shit down our throat, you sound like the same kind of people that knock on my door on Sunday mornings trying to force me to follow their religion beliefs.
There are no victims here, site's up and running, bro.

I found this Site here: https://www.scryptocean.com/?ref=webcrush

It´s smell like scrypt.cc...900 satoshi for Khs, 70 Days ROI,  Every 10 min Payouts....same Admin ??

The only Different ist GHS Cloud Mining.


Scrypt.cc 2.0 or what

I found this Site here: https://www.scryptocean.com/?ref=webcrush

It´s smell like scrypt.cc...900 satoshi for Khs, 70 Days ROI,  Every 10 min Payouts....same Admin ??

The only Different ist GHS Cloud Mining.


Scrypt.cc 2.0 or what

Mine or not mine scrypt.cc pay money to invetsors

Admit or not admit persons Herr not care if these money come from mine or selling fetus for stemcell at silk road!! (think most unethical think you mind imagine!!!)

not one cares if mine is real only that is pays

Why r u assuming that Scrypt.cc doesn't own any of the pools listed in that LTC piechart? They could be operating one of the mining pools under another name.

Why not ask your beloved Marcelo for some citations? He's the one claiming he's mining with folks like you to back him up? Why is the burden of proof not on the man making all these claims? Can YOU come up with one suitable candidate for a non-LTC coin he could be mining that would accommodate his hash rate and have enough liquidity in the market  to exchange for the BTC payouts? I'll wait...

is it only me that can't log in ? it keeps saying invalid username/password whenever I try to log in. my friend already can log in so IDK whats going on

Some citations would be nice and give u credibility.

There is over 100 scrypt coins and not all of them are listed in coinpro

Ok, class, anyone feeling a little unwell can excuse themselves and go see your therapist about learning to accept loss. While you're there, ask him to teach you some critical thinking skills.

For the rest of you, this is gonna be FUN!!!!

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
---------
810GH/s

We now look further down the list of Scrypt coins, to those that aren't necessarily more profitable to mine than LTC but, because so many of you little darlings want to pretend that your beloved, 'Admin' has some super-clever way to mine less profitable coins on the sly and then sell them during tiny market-value increases that *might* lift them above LTC, we'll indulge you:


So we're going to allow for PLENTY of wiggle-room here and go pretty far down this list. Digibyte shows a global Scrypt hash of 260Mh/s according to their own stats.

When we add up ALL the above network hashrates (omitting LTC obv.) we get: 14.52GH/s

Ouchie.

But, hang on, maybe something magical happens when you do the sums? Let's see:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
-15GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the remaining top 20 Scrypt coins
---------
795GH/s

OH NOES!!!!

What does that mean? ARGH!!! The sky is actually fucking falling!

So, kiddlies, even if we pretend *real* fuckin' hard that scrypt.cc is mining ALL of the ENTIRE top 20 Scrypt coin networks, we're still left with 795GH/s of mining that . . .well. . .huh?

B. . .Bu. . .But. . .Marcelo!





Class is excused.

Why r u assuming that Scrypt.cc doesn't own any of the pools listed in that LTC piechart? They could be operating one of the mining pools under another name.

How did u come up with the 27.73 GHS and why did u assume that the total mining hash for tag coin is only 40 MH?

The reason I keep saying it is because I keep fucking proving it. Are you lot so goddam lazy that you really can't be arsed to check some basic math before throwing your BTC at an easily-provable scam?

Fine, yes, I do have some time at this moment. I'm supposed to be finishing off some other work but this well of human stupidity keeps drawing me back in like some old-worlde freak-show. Let's run through it, shall we?

Now, children, are you paying attention, you don't want to get overwhelmed by the incredible complexity of what I am about to explain to you.

Scrypt.cc claim to be mining 850GH/s of Scrypt coin.

So, first let's take a look at the mack-daddy of Scrypt coins, LTC. With 850GH/s potentially available to them, there's absolutely no point in  mining at a pool because then they'd be paying pool fees and, besides, with a potential 71.9% of the entire hashpower for LTC in their pocket, they'd easily out-mine any fucking pool out there.

Checking the actual stats we see what, children?


That's correct, kiddos, "Unknown" accounts for just 12GH/s of mining. Now it is extremely unlikely that "Unknown" would only be one entity, but just to be generous let's pretend for shits'n'giggles that "Unknown" is all scrypt.cc mining. K? M'Kay.

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s
---------
838GH/s of Scrypt that is apparently being pointed at other Scrypt coin networks.


. . . .to be continued but I want to just let this sink in first. I think you know what's coming next.

Anyhoo, while we wonder aloud where Neil might have got to, let's carry on with the compleximacation mathemitcallasthnetics, hmm?

So, as I was saying:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s
---------
838GH/s of Scrypt that is apparently being pointed at other Scrypt coin networks.

First, let's take a look at the top 8 Scrypt coins you can mine which will payout more of their own coins in value than that wot u wud get frm LTC


Now, again, each of these coins have their own pools which generally account for the hashrate you see here but, just for funzies, let us play a game of pretend, ok children?

Let us all close our eyes real tight and make a wish as *hard* as we can and wish that ALL the mining of these coins is being done solely from the 838GH/s of Scrypt mining power scrypt.cc are left with after you finally accept they ain't fucking mining LTC with it.

According to the only pool I can find for Tagcoin http://tagmining.com/ it has 40MH/s hashrate. So we'll work with that figure.

When we add up all of the above network hashrates we get: 27.73 GH/s

That's ALL of them listed above and, let's not forget our fun game of pretending that nobody else is mining these coins apart from scrypt.cc, ok?M'kay.

Back to the math:

850GH/s of Scrypt
-12GH/s - 'Unknown' on LTC
-28GH/s - The entire network hashrate of the top 8 Scrypt coins
---------
810GH/s

Ooooh, it's not looking good for the next lot of Scrypt coins to list. Feeling a little nauseous now, are ya?

. . . .to be continued.

OK, then only one similarity is that they didnt post any proof of mining. I expected more from you, man . But I know your math proofs, and if nothing more, then its "amoral" at least  

Badbitcoin is not a worthy example to use here. Vik openly states that the Badbitcoin project is funded at least in part by Scrypt.CC, so he's unlikely to speak out against it as he's probably on the side of the fanboys who will defend it while it burns in front of us. Vik also openly admits to being funded by Paycoin and Hashstakers, another known Ponzi that collapsed and left people broke.

Fact of the matter is, the similarities are glaring: an investment supposedly based on mining where no mining can be proven and something ultimately causes payouts to stop. In the case of both BCS and Scrypt.CC, if actual mining was taking place, it would be a trivial task to show basic blockchain stats of blocks solved for whatever coins were being mined, and neither operation is able to provide this very basic evidence in support of their claims.

So how would it be possible for Scrypt.cc to be able to negotiate lower energy prices when Brazil has approximately triple the energy costs as USA with the recent hikes in energy prices? http://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-business/electricity-bills-to-increase-by-70-percent-in-rio-and-sao-paulo/#

You may also combine this with the anonymous newbie account, no pictures of any mining equipment, and the recent "hack" which would make it pretty much impossible for them to repay all customers. The name Marcelo Santos doesn't really mean anything, might as well be Jesus as there is nothing to check it against.