Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 384. (Read 750572 times)

scam scam and scam

Good job, nice work. We need more media outlets willing to explain the facts about 'cloud mining'.

While you're at it, perhaps you might want to extend the article to question why a service purporting to help users learn which cryptocurrency services are suspected scams, is so fervently shilling for scrypt.cc and was also a spittle-flecked rabid shill for Homero Joshua Garza's GAW/Hashlet/XPY fraud.

Badbitcoin.org appears to suffer from selective reasoning.

I see cryptodevil and stop to read sorry . If you can reffer to this stranger, obviously not health person, I cant trust you, sorry. Use at least ThePhwner please.

Thanks cryptodevil, just the explanation I needed. Just added to will scrypt.cc be the next cloud mining HYIP to fail?

this site scamed my 0.61 btc today... it scamming people one by one.. i will share proof when will use my computer.i will advice you all to withdraw your money from scrypt.cc otherwise you will cry oneday

thank you, time to buy some now and sell tomorrow

rewards and the price both have increased
now the only thing left is the price of khs to increase

You only need concern yourself with Litecoin and any coin with sufficient market liquidity which is more profitable than Litecoin to mine. There would be zero point in mining anything less profitable than Litecoin if you are seeking to sell what you are mining to earn the bitcoin that scrypt.cc 'pays out' every ten minutes.

Fact is you can check this yourself. Go to coinwarz.com and add up the total network Hashrate for Litecoin and any Scrypt coin above it in the list which isn't merge-mined with Litecoin.

Now add up the Hashrate of the public pools for those coins because scrypt.cc wouldn't be wasting money paying pool fees when they have way more than enough power to solo mine every coin including Litecoin, and deduct that total Hashrate of the public pools from the total Hashrate for the combined coin networks.

There is no space left to hide but a tiny fraction of scrypt.cc's claimed 850GH/s of Scrypt ASIC mining power.

Ergo, they are lying about mining with 850GH/s of scrypt hash power.

Lol, that's true! 
But being serious, have you guys analyzed the figures of daily investments into SCC over the last months?
Are these figures I'm seeing are from real people, or SCC consolidates some unused outputs regularly?
Again, I would really like to hear thoughts from normal people, not some preaching devils 
Thanks!

Im agree with you cryptodevil.
For all readers : its your choice. All newbie here speak very loudly. so you cannot hear the warn from Senior, Hero member here. Take it wisely

Most of them don't have a big enough network to support this amt of hash or even a fraction of it. 850 Gh/s is a lot of Scrypt hash.

Is that almost exactly what Garza said about Hashlets and Beekeeper said about Gen II asics, the "custom software" stuff?

SHA256 is like 27 coins. According to http://coinwik.org/List_of_all_DCs there are 174 scrypt or variation of scrypt coins. With custom software couldn't a scrypt miner mine the most profitable of the 174 scrypt coins?

[expletive deleted] ASIC miners can only mine the specific ALGO they are designed for!

Bitcoin ASIC miners can only mine SHA256 coins and Litecoin ASIC miners can only mine Scrypt coins.

Who says its only mining scrypt coins? For these profits and ROI, it is more likely that other algos are being mined as well. According to the website, their "custom software mines the most profitable coins!". Last time I checked there are 78 crypto coins out there in 7 algorithms, and the hashing power is... I dont know how much, but probably more than 10 times the 850GH. Hamsterpool has some software that automatically switches your miner to the most profitable coin in an algorithm. Now if Scrypt.CC had their own miners, could they have a "custom software" that switches their miners to the most profitable algorithm and coin? I believe this operation takes a lot of work and time to maintain and keep running. I mean, I am 30 years old, never married and new to ScryptCC and I spent hours a day reinvesting and watching my KHS grow. Imagine how much it would take someone like Admin a day and he has family to look after, too. Don't be so pessimistic cryptodevil. They way you are reacting seems like you are from another competing service like hashnest. Unfortunately bitcoin is not as profitable these days with the current difficulty and people are forced to mine more profitable coins. I started my investment on June 6th. I cant say yet if this is a ponzi or not because, I have wont see my ROI until August 18th (73 days after my investment). If you want to be 100% safe, my advice for you is be neutral until you get proof of success or fail, otherwise you are just gambling, like everyone else owning a crypto coin.

hey cryptodevil, you hate scc so much, but just imagine this "huge scam" will end. What you will do then? This thread will be dead and nobody will care. Your existence will not have sense anymore. , Im really sorry to say ..

Again, These "nay sayers" keep on discouraging people joining SCC yet they always keep the thread up.  

tsk.. got nothing to say no more.. hahaha but then again.. thanks for making SCC a hot topic..

Given that we can't tell who here is an 'innocent victim' stubbornly refusing to accept the truth or a paid shill/members of the criminal gang running these multiple ponzi scams, it is best to safely assume that anyone attempting to defend this fraudulent site in the face of indisputable facts is likely to be less than 'innocent'.

If I hurt the feelings of the 'innocents' or offend them in any way that's just too bad. I'm here to send a message, not pander to self-indulgent immature narcissists who cite 'tone complaint' as their only response to what I have to say.

For every one stubborn idiot in this thread who refuse to listen to the content of the message, there'll be dozens more who 'get it' and are better off for having 'got it'.

Not necessarily. It's normal behavior for people to want to keep believing in a lie, when they've already believed it before.
Especially if they have money invested in said lie.

But you bring up good points: "complaining about Facts U Dislike being posted in a discussion thread normally singles you out to be a shill or even part of the scammer group themselves"
This is what stops you guys from getting your point across. The fact is that you guys attack everybody who wants to keep on believing.
Ever think about the possibility that they themselves might be one of the innocent victims you are so furiously trying to protect?

Just because someone doesn't see things the way you see them, and wants to stubbornly keep on believing what you have proved to be wrong, doesn't make them amoral, stupid or a scammer.
Just a human being, hoping that you're wrong, and that he won't lose money.

Oh it is never futile when there's always the chance to show that scumbitch Vik from badbitcoin.org to be the immoral shill she always has been.