Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 415. (Read 750572 times)

didn,t marcelo do everything alone
hahaha
let me guess ?? U are marcelo...hmmmmm Error

Escape?
Things are great at SCC.
This thread has become the same 4-5 guys circle jerking on ponzi theories.
While the circle jerking happen over here.
SCC's stronger then ever over there, where it matters.
I just withdrew 48 BTC and it hit the blockchain in 2 minutes after I clicked the confirmation link.
Thanks to Marcelo and the crew, good shit. 

As a Linux Mint/Ubuntu user, I am not worried about this at all, lol.

I can read chinese, what part do you want me to read?

@cryptodevil

I think it's important to have people out there that try to explain how mining actually works to people that are brand new to cryptocurrency.  That's why I offered evidence to show that scrypt.cc's historical returns are unjustifiable based on the actual profitability of scrypt coins.

But no matter what, evidence-based arguments are answered with complete nonsense.  Goldman Sachs was one of several companies that invested a total of $50 million in Circle, a website where you can buy Bitcoin with a credit card.  What the hell does that have to do with scrypt.cc?  As you pointed out, absolutely nothing.

Scrypt.cc says they paid like $2.50 per mhs for their hash power.  That's far less than what it will cost even when next generation hardware comes out.  There's no evidence they're actually mining, their returns are not based on reality, their payouts don't vary enough to account for the constant conversion from scrypt to Bitcoin they pretend they're doing, dissident voices are routinely muted in their chat, the list goes on...

These are things that we see and know are clear evidence of a scam, especially considering how easy it would be for scrypt.cc to prove us wrong if they were actually mining.  The evidence is out there for anyone to see.

My point with all this is to say, maybe it's time to throw in the towel.  The overwhelming tidal wave of stupidity will continue to crash down no matter what.

Here comes the BS again...so they only hack scrypt.cc hahahahaha you crack me open you funny ho
Why doesn,t their blockchain get hacked,,or their email gmail banc account etc....
Because this is all set up to make the ponzi work
steal deposits withdrawels and clean out complete accounts...
.................................................................



And this is 4 you gulhatin
U talk more bs than me
U only attack people and u never come with facts...
I can say a lot of facts about scrypt....u can say ish
U climb in the butt cheeks from marcelo maybee he is mining in there ....loser

ok, so if we get both (or all) lists, we can make a short program to filter them to get the number.
Any useable source you know?

Ah, I don't know if you could. After all, the network is based on the number of hashes it receives per second, not whether those same hashes are also being sent to other coin networks.

Does anybody else have any suggestions for whether it can be discerned how much of a network is merged mining?

ok, got it. Is there anywhere some info available, how much is merge-mining, and how much is "native" mining?

No, remember you still have to account for those miners who only mine Dogecoin and don't merge-mine.

Remember, it is one hash 'answer' sent to each of the merge-mined coin networks for every new hash cycle. So a single hashing cycle will show up for each of them, not be divided amongst them.

Since it obviously still happens, once again, the warning:

DO NOT OPEN ANY LINKS FROM THE CHAT / TROLLBOX!

I can hardly believe that I really have to say it.

More specifically, the links to "Cloudminer.biz".

The "client" that can be downloaded from this site is demonstrably a Trojan.

And yes, I'm sure. VirusTotal, and similar tools do not recognize it.
Your anti-virus program does not protect you against it.

This Trojan is undetected! (yet)

This nasty little beast, digs deep into your system, occupy various system processes (and your browser)
and transmits sensitive data (eg your login information to Scrypt.cc ..) to its creator.

I actually thought common sense would be enough.
But if you shall download a "client" to get free Hashrate (already the 'free' is suspect),
every small Alarm lamp in your brain should suddenly begin frantically blinking.


Be careful people!


Edit:
small correction.
An exception, of course, the two excellent projects sccstats.com and msgrelay.com

[/quote]

Just opened IRC this morning and saw topic updated by one of support members. It may calm you down, they currently have 859 tickets in line to be answered so it may take some time... But mostly he said that ["We're experiencing high server load. Don't be afraid if you have a negative balance, it'll sort out. Reward @ 12.8574Sat/KHS. Beware of phishing links and other scams. Escrow.com has info on preventing fraud in transfers.] so they are aware and working on it, just give sometime and then when stuff are solved/or not come and tell us how things were "sorted out"
[/quote]

Really thanks for the update

Ok, but this can't be right. In this moment LTC is at 1.11 Th/s and DOGE at 1.48 Th/s. Supposed you are right, it had to be the other way around...?

Btw. in the one pool I found some big guys, so it's still possible (from this perspective) that it's scrypt.cc. So more to search....

No, that is multi-mining and basically is the same as mining on three completely separate scrypt networks, which all have difference 'answers' to the hash.

With merged-mining the ASIC produces a 'hash' and 'presents' it to each of the coin networks it is merge-mining at. If it works in any of them, ka-ching, block reward!

So 300Mh/s merge-mining is 300MH/s for each coin network being merge-mined, as I said.

I try.

But this would be a stupid calculation, but crypto currencies (and people behind) are not stupid...
Is there somewhere a better kind of "official" definition to this?
From my mind (I'm php developer now btw...), I would clearly expect 300MH/s which mines 3 coins are calculated as 100MH/s on each coin...

You misunderstand the situation:

What this means is that if half of, say, 1000GH/s total hashing on the Litecoin network is merge-mined, this will show up as 1000GH/s hashrate for LTC and 500Gh/s hashrate on the Dogecoin network (plus the small amount of dedicated Dogecoin miners)

For an individual mining machine this means mining at a given hash-rate and for that hashrate to be reported within each of the coin networks it is merge-mining. e.g. a 300MH/s scrypt miner which is merge-mining LTC,DOGE and SYS will show up as 300MH/s on LTC, 300MH/s on DOGE and 300MH/s on SYS.

Do you follow?

Just opened IRC this morning and saw topic updated by one of support members. It may calm you down, they currently have 859 tickets in line to be answered so it may take some time... But mostly he said that ["We're experiencing high server load. Don't be afraid if you have a negative balance, it'll sort out. Reward @ 12.8574Sat/KHS. Beware of phishing links and other scams. Escrow.com has info on preventing fraud in transfers.] so they are aware and working on it, just give sometime and then when stuff are solved/or not come and tell us how things were "sorted out"

Sorry, it's not absurdity, it's just my own experience. So if you think this is absurdity, you are unexperienced, which is no problem, as 99,99% of all people are a bit naive...


I think the facts are not as clear as you may think. And this can have two reasons:
1. Maybe you did not ask all needed questions and did not follow all hints.
2. Maybe they are clear and you just explained it bad...

I'm still searching....

and btw. I have the impresson your card is ok...

Hold on while I just reach into my pocket and pull out my "Totally not a GS Puppet" membership card.

You *do* realise the absurdity of what you are asking, right?

Besides which, even *if* Goldman Sachs gave a flying one about some scrypt-mining operation, how does that change the facts that 850GH/s of scrypt-mining is clearly not down to scrypt.cc, as evidenced by the data I just posted?

Thx for the link, but as I understood it, it's exactly in opposite. The hashrate is Litecoin+Dogecoin (see the table, it's added), and it would not make sense to be in one, but the payment is in both coins. I think in this point you misunderstood, or it is written wrong in the article (or my english is to poor...).
http://digiconomist.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/statistics1509.png



Yes, that's a good point, but still a difference between "can't do" and "don't want to". So it's a good point, but not a fact.
This still leads me to the inner strcture of the pools. Any info about this?
If I get no straight fact for the one or the other side, I can digg deeper and try to eliminate unclear points. At the end I maybe find clear straight facts...

(And now pls. noone be attacked or pissed off of this):
I think all know that Goldmann Sachs invested 50 million USD in Bitcoin business. So by this now the real big gangsters entered the room... Not only the UA "amateurs" are here now... (btw. I'm on GS's blacklists..., I know a bit of the game...).
So one thing is a sure fact for me. If someone has a good business in any kind of money business, there will be for 100% sure people who got sent by GSs buddies to harm this business as much as possible. So who proofs me, that some here in forum are not "GS puppets"? No offense pls, but as i told you, I have more than one perspective to the topc...