And my opinin towards the power failure is, that in any company it could happen. Especially in companies that consume that much energy. And the really fast movement of the asics from DC2 to DC4 confused me a bit, but i think as i said in this thread already, they got containers where they have their asics in and they moved them on trucks and simply had to put power and internet to the containers. So this fast movement was possible then.
But this whole, 'they have them in shipping containers' thing isn't even proven, it is simply supposition for how they could possibly have moved so many units so quickly. You might as well have said they had an army of midgets at their disposal to help out, if you're going to just be making stuff up.
Of course the electricity 'could' have been cut due to legal issues, why would a fraudulent operation assert something that didn't sound plausible when they can simply manipulate the market by referencing a power-outage at their main DC? It works as both a way to nicely panic the trading market while reinforcing to the 'believers' that they must have the ASIC hardware and the multiple DC's, right? RIGHT? Cos', you know, they are talking about them having had a power outage, so, ummmm, totally *not* a fractional mining/ponzi fraud, right? Right?
Remember, for all the people who are trying to float the, "Hey it's just a gamble" turd of a 'justification', it is only a gamble if the participants are aware of the realities of wager.
An organisation claiming to be something it is not, in order to attract 'investors', is committing a criminal act. It is not investment, it is fraud.
You are right. They have a lack of transparency. But today everyone wants to be anonymous. So i can life with the anonymous operation of the admin even if he can scam us a lot easier that way.
great job guys keep up rolling balls. 
