I don't know, what i should do now?
Divesting and invest in other cloudmining companies?
Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 446. (Read 750572 times)
i put in 2 support tickets both got deleted without any answer.
Why is that?
Why is that?
I think scrypt.cc will be dead in summer
Says the guy shilling for a competitor ponzi scam with an even worse score than this ponzi scam
cloudminr.io 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
I think scrypt.cc will be dead in summer
@ajareselde:
It seems they had some issues with the electricity contracts. So they moved miners to another farm with power prices much upper. So the rewards have decreased drastically.
It seems they had some issues with the electricity contracts. So they moved miners to another farm with power prices much upper. So the rewards have decreased drastically.
Whats up with scrypt.cc in regards of mining rewards? I dont have any khashes there , but have a lot of referrals that were making me decent amount per day in ref. earnings,
but lately that reward is quite a bit lower than it used to be, even tho my downline still has the same kh mining..
Did they cut back on mining reward that much ?!
cheers
but lately that reward is quite a bit lower than it used to be, even tho my downline still has the same kh mining..
Did they cut back on mining reward that much ?!
cheers
You have zero, none, no evidence what so ever that scrypt cc is a scam. In fact, we have quite the opposite. An online business running for almost 18 months paying out to its customers like clockwork.
A well ponzi can survive a very long time before collapse. Duration is not an 'evidence' of legit like you said... Search wikipedia for exemples during more than 4 years...People have made hundreds of thousands of dollars.
And people have spent more than 6 millions of dollars... (see the hotwallet)You have zero, none, no evidence what so ever that scrypt cc is a scam. In fact, we have quite the opposite.
So, let me see, hum. We have :- No proof of work (why hide it if it is really legit ?)
- No one single picture of the farm
- No information about the staff
- Admin's promises aren't kept (2FA, new version of the site pormised since 6 month, tutorial on how to use the API, site in multiple languages, mine a specific coin, make public our 0% fee pool for all scrypt coins, including a auto profit switch function, etc...)
- Strange story about electricity, and best of all : moving an entire farm to another in less than 24h.
My only problem with scrypt cc is that I don't have enough money to put in there otherwise I'd be semi retired by now. [...] I will continue to enjoy the hundreds of dollars per week that scrypt cc pay me.
That is the best part with ponzi schemes : everybody inside needs the scam during the longer it can for makes money over the new arrivals.So while you sit around with your finger in your ass
Maybe he has his own finger in his ass, but i think you have Marcelo's in your... ;-) Just incase u missed it, I'll say it again:
"So unless you can show me some sort of actual evidence that scrypt.cc is a scam, you can kindly fuck off from this thread. Let the adults talk about adult things and you can go play with the children in the backyard screaming "ponzi ponzi" all fucking day"
All I see from you is the same crappy arguments about ponzis and scams with no evidence except your opinion which isn't worth shit incase you weren't aware.
Maybe you missed my earlier post which calmly and rationally presented objective reasoning towards why the type of people who demand for evidence-of-scam, while ignoring all indication-of-scam, are either shills or mentally incapable of understanding basic common-sense and likely to spend much of their lives wondering why they keep getting ripped off.
Here, let me help you out so you can save time on looking it up and get back to the serious business of blowing raspberries.
Ohhh I see, so your reply to my post, where you clearly state I am failing to comprehend the content of your earlier assertion, is actually just bollocks and I did, indeed, understand your post to be excusing the scrypt.cc scam on the basis that you are claiming it has been running for long enough now that it surely must be legit.
Glad we cleared that up. Funny that, Josh Garza's scam also was shown to be running an active campaign to try and counter the allegations by saying it was all meaningless FUD unless someone could show proof of wrongdoing. Is that where you're going with this? Stating that scrypt.cc has to be considered innocent until proven guilty?
You are going to be falling for a lot of scams in your life if that is how you are going to base any evaluation of whether to buy in to them or not.
After-the-fact discovery of proof is not likely to save people from losing their money. So by establishing the fact that scrypt.cc flags up for all the warning signs of being a ponzi and is actually unwilling to prove otherwise, we can safely say that it is highly likely to be a scam.
Glad we cleared that up. Funny that, Josh Garza's scam also was shown to be running an active campaign to try and counter the allegations by saying it was all meaningless FUD unless someone could show proof of wrongdoing. Is that where you're going with this? Stating that scrypt.cc has to be considered innocent until proven guilty?
You are going to be falling for a lot of scams in your life if that is how you are going to base any evaluation of whether to buy in to them or not.
After-the-fact discovery of proof is not likely to save people from losing their money. So by establishing the fact that scrypt.cc flags up for all the warning signs of being a ponzi and is actually unwilling to prove otherwise, we can safely say that it is highly likely to be a scam.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
So i see that this thread has gone the usual route of rallying the shills to try and discredit anyone who raises valid concerns about the fact that this scheme is clearly a ponzi.
Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
Guys, just check https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudmining-101-ponzi-risk-assessment-878387 and you'll find it's a ponzi. No need to argue and call names each other 
It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.
It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
Just incase u missed it, I'll say it again:
"So unless you can show me some sort of actual evidence that scrypt.cc is a scam, you can kindly fuck off from this thread. Let the adults talk about adult things and you can go play with the children in the backyard screaming "ponzi ponzi" all fucking day"
All I see from you is the same crappy arguments about ponzis and scams with no evidence except your opinion which isn't worth shit incase you weren't aware.
Actually you should show us the proof that they are really mining. They can't provide a mining address, pictures of mining farm and no ASIC vendors are backing up.
So i see that this thread has gone the usual route of rallying the shills to try and discredit anyone who raises valid concerns about the fact that this scheme is clearly a ponzi.
Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
Guys, just check https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudmining-101-ponzi-risk-assessment-878387 and you'll find it's a ponzi. No need to argue and call names each other It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.
It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
Just incase u missed it, I'll say it again:
"So unless you can show me some sort of actual evidence that scrypt.cc is a scam, you can kindly fuck off from this thread. Let the adults talk about adult things and you can go play with the children in the backyard screaming "ponzi ponzi" all fucking day"
All I see from you is the same crappy arguments about ponzis and scams with no evidence except your opinion which isn't worth shit incase you weren't aware.
So i see that this thread has gone the usual route of rallying the shills to try and discredit anyone who raises valid concerns about the fact that this scheme is clearly a ponzi.
Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
Guys, just check https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudmining-101-ponzi-risk-assessment-878387 and you'll find it's a ponzi. No need to argue and call names each other It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.
It says only preliminary assessment, but I encourage the author to put a final one.Anyone who isn't a corrupt shill can easily check the post history of these ad-hominem-spewing users to see that the vast majority of them appear to solely be here to promote scrypt.cc and drown out any dissent.
@galdur You appear to have quite the problem with your attempts to rage-quit this discussion, how many more times are you going to keep posting that this is, "goodbye forever"? Also, pro-tip, when you have been presented with a rational, reasoned, explanation for why something most probably is not what it is claiming to be, your pat response of simply resorting to ad-hominem against the people who are presenting said rational and reasoned concerns clearly shows that you have nothing to rebut the position and have to resort to scrabbling at your keyboard in the hope that attempting to dismiss a rational and reasoned position by posting the equivalent of blowing a raspberry will be seen as a reasoned rebuttal.
Just in case you were under the mistaken impression it is working for you, I'll let you in to a secret, it isn't.
I do not think I invest more in scrypt.cc , cloudminr is my no 1. now
Really? Why? How long does this website exist?
It exist 6 months with 70k users
I do not think I invest more in scrypt.cc , cloudminr is my no 1. now
Really? Why? How long does this website exist?
Admin just announced ..., but dont expect it to kick in for two weeks.
Can anyone explain the last part of this message, please?
I do not think I invest more in scrypt.cc , cloudminr is my no 1. now
Wow this eletricity talking made me look up in investing more as we have low prices by now... too much effort for just a couple of thousands more (if it is/was a ponzi like half the dudes that come here everysingle time we have news about scryptcc). But for us still investing that might be the time, a 20-40% increase in rewards to be realistic would be much apreciated.
Things seem to be looking up again at scrypt.cc
Better elec rates, higher payouts.
Better elec rates, higher payouts.
Yes vm_mpn I think it will be contract 1.
We are happy with scrypt.cc too many jealous guys on bitcointalk. I make 6 X ROI.
We are happy with scrypt.cc too many jealous guys on bitcointalk. I make 6 X ROI.
So, can anybody confirm these new power numbers?
Contract 1 - 0.225 BRL / Kw ($0.08 / Kw) - safe option
Contract 2 - 0.18 BRL / Kw ($0.06 / Kw) - unsafe option ?
Efficiency average 20w per 1 MHs (according to admin in the chat room). Assuming they are running mix of Innosilicone and Zeus miners as efficiency falls somewhere in between. Gridseeds are about 30W / MH
I could be wrong - Gridseed G-Black 4U 25MH/s units rated at 500W which puts them exactly at 20W / MH
Contract 1 - 0.225 BRL / Kw ($0.08 / Kw) - safe option
Contract 2 - 0.18 BRL / Kw ($0.06 / Kw) - unsafe option ?
I could be wrong - Gridseed G-Black 4U 25MH/s units rated at 500W which puts them exactly at 20W / MH
Cryptodevil, I don't really know how to say this except to say that you are such a massive loser!
It doesn't matter what happens with scrypt.cc all you are going to say is "it's part of the scam"
Electricity goes off, you say " see it's a scam, say good bye to your money"
Electricity comes on, you say " oh well that's part of the plan by admin to scam everyone out of profits"
Someone goes to Brazil to visit the facilities, "oh he must be part of the scam too"
You have zero, none, no evidence what so ever that scrypt cc is a scam. In fact, we have quite the opposite. An online business running for almost 18 months paying out to its customers like clockwork. People have made hundreds of thousands of dollars. My only problem with scrypt cc is that I don't have enough money to put in there otherwise I'd be semi retired by now.
So while you sit around with your finger in your ass, I will continue to enjoy the hundreds of dollars per week that scrypt cc pay me.
So unless you can show me some sort of actual evidence that scrypt.cc is a scam, you can kindly fuck off from this thread. Let the adults talk about adult things and you can go play with the children in the backyard screaming "ponzi ponzi" all fucking day.
It doesn't matter what happens with scrypt.cc all you are going to say is "it's part of the scam"
Electricity goes off, you say " see it's a scam, say good bye to your money"
Electricity comes on, you say " oh well that's part of the plan by admin to scam everyone out of profits"
Someone goes to Brazil to visit the facilities, "oh he must be part of the scam too"
You have zero, none, no evidence what so ever that scrypt cc is a scam. In fact, we have quite the opposite. An online business running for almost 18 months paying out to its customers like clockwork. People have made hundreds of thousands of dollars. My only problem with scrypt cc is that I don't have enough money to put in there otherwise I'd be semi retired by now.
So while you sit around with your finger in your ass, I will continue to enjoy the hundreds of dollars per week that scrypt cc pay me.
So unless you can show me some sort of actual evidence that scrypt.cc is a scam, you can kindly fuck off from this thread. Let the adults talk about adult things and you can go play with the children in the backyard screaming "ponzi ponzi" all fucking day.
I don´t need to read this junk. Not going to watch some obsessive-compulsive cases whine the same song for the unforeseeable future. Bye forever.
Jump to: