Author

Topic: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts - page 105. (Read 1404024 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762


I'm talking about free tournaments...

Free tournaments are boring, deposit some coin and get in some real tournaments.
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100


I'm talking about free tournaments...
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
If you don't have btc to play buy or win some

If you don't have fiat to buy the btc, get a job

If you can't get a job, think what you can do to get some fiat
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Quote
What you need is a job.


Excuse me ?
I don't understand.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762

Quote
Can't you play for free without a password?

I don't play.
I need a password.







What you need is a job.
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100

Quote
Can't you play for free without a password?

I don't play.
I need a password.





legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018


Hello.
I'm a poker player but I don't have money.
I want to play in a free tournament.
The problem is that I need the password to register...

Get some BTC then play Smiley

Can't you play for free without a password?
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100


In any tournament hold'em.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1001


Hello.
I'm a poker player but I don't have money.
I want to play in a free tournament.
The problem is that I need the password to register...

you prob cant play then, what tourney?
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100


Hello.
I'm a poker player but I don't have money.
I want to play in a free tournament.
The problem is that I need the password to register...
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I haven't been playing on SwC for a month

Should I jump in? Please someone tell me games are soft and tourneys have nice prizepool

games are soft, prizepools are shitty
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
I haven't been playing on SwC for a month

Should I jump in? Please someone tell me games are soft and tourneys have nice prizepool
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Unless they are only 1-tabling, people couldn't just bust a tourney and re-enter on another screenname unless they had an extra computer available.  In which case they could just sign up anyways.  ASll of you complaining about late registration should use your brain, it adds to prizepools and does zero to reduce your (perceived) edge.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
and if anyone has time, buy-in, or stack/structure feeback I'd like to hear it. 

Why not try out some higher buyin limit tournaments?  A 50 chip/500 gtd LHE or FLO8 would almost def not overlay, and get more people into non-nl games.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Micon how do respond to some of the rumors floating around that your site is rigged to produce dramatic play scenarios to increase rake potential?

I would say that is severely implausible for the following reasons:
1)  rigging the site in any way seems -EV long term.
2) "dramatic play scenarios" do not make poker more fun or produce more rake - in fact when you bust a player they no longer play - so if we were purely greedy, had 1000x Zuckerberg+ coders on meth ready to fire, and believed no one would ever notice, I supposed we'd deal everyone non-dramatic play scenarios as to keep everyone playing.  Of course this would be much harder to program / keep running / keep it consta-rigging than simply making a proper poker site.
3) I think it's clear to most that the way a site gets more rakes is to get more players.  That's always been my goal - to popularize the site and help make it super-fun to play.



Lol nope was just asking a question, i personally love how seals is, because im used to it.

There is a major logical fallacy in most users claiming highly complex rigging scenarios:  On one hand, they may say "that's the style of play I employ on this site, because, you know, it's rigged and shit, that type of stuff hits here" I have heard this paraphrased time and time again, when referring to live or online cardrooms, dealers, decks, shuffle-machines, you name it, I've heard a guy blame it for a losing hand of poker.

There is only 1 way to prove rigging:  science.   Every player can collect their own personal hole card data, flop data, and after 100k+ hands or so you can really see how close your distribution is to average.  You can see how many standard deviations off they are.   Hint:  A handful of independent entities have already done this. 

Outside of science terms, it's tough to argue "it's rigged for X's pleasure" debates.  We simply deal a fair game IMO.



Above and beyond answer, thank you
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1014
FPV Drone Pilot
♣ ♣ ♣ Serious MTT Soon ♣ ♣ ♣
in ~1.3 hrs there will be the

♣ ♣ ♣ Friday 4.20k GTD ♣ ♣ ♣

this overlay'd like a boss last week.  Over a bitcoin! 

While I would like to see my GTD's meet, the players would prolly take it either way - free coinage from SwC or a bigger prizepool.

190+10 is this one of our biggest buy-ins that we run each week.  Our best players show up for this one, as you can frequently bink off 1.5+ coins for 1st.  I want to get this one hot again, and if anyone has time, buy-in, or stack/structure feeback I'd like to hear it.  I'll be doing another round of MTT schedule changes soon, and I'm going to be messing with some structures, starting with our biggest and most serious MTTs like the Friday 4.2k GTD.

GLGLGLGLGL

#DontGetShutOut
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1014
FPV Drone Pilot
Micon how do respond to some of the rumors floating around that your site is rigged to produce dramatic play scenarios to increase rake potential?

I would say that is severely implausible for the following reasons:
1)  rigging the site in any way seems -EV long term.
2) "dramatic play scenarios" do not make poker more fun or produce more rake - in fact when you bust a player they no longer play - so if we were purely greedy, had 1000x Zuckerberg+ coders on meth ready to fire, and believed no one would ever notice, I supposed we'd deal everyone non-dramatic play scenarios as to keep everyone playing.  Of course this would be much harder to program / keep running / keep it consta-rigging than simply making a proper poker site.
3) I think it's clear to most that the way a site gets more rakes is to get more players.  That's always been my goal - to popularize the site and help make it super-fun to play.



Lol nope was just asking a question, i personally love how seals is, because im used to it.

There is a major logical fallacy in most users claiming highly complex rigging scenarios:  On one hand, they may say "that's the style of play I employ on this site, because, you know, it's rigged and shit, that type of stuff hits here" I have heard this paraphrased time and time again, when referring to live or online cardrooms, dealers, decks, shuffle-machines, you name it, I've heard a guy blame it for a losing hand of poker.

There is only 1 way to prove rigging:  science.   Every player can collect their own personal hole card data, flop data, and after 100k+ hands or so you can really see how close your distribution is to average.  You can see how many standard deviations off they are.   Hint:  A handful of independent entities have already done this. 

Outside of science terms, it's tough to argue "it's rigged for X's pleasure" debates.  We simply deal a fair game IMO.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Lol nope was just asking a question, i personally love how seals is, because im used to it.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
Micon how do respond to some of the rumors floating around that your site is rigged to produce dramatic play scenarios to increase rake potential?




I think this means someone has an ax to grind.  Cute pic.  Maybe the guy has an axe to grinde against micone, dunno.
full member
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
Nice picture   Cheesy

Looks like the guy is working quite hard for that
Jump to: