Topic: SEC is helping - page 2. (Read 17134 times)
Sec does regulate this problem but it is not entirely and they will not be able to give us big profits. Just look at the time when the ICO was devastated and the market situation was increasingly chaotic with all this, of course, we were very worried whether the program could bring a near future.
The SEC can't do nearly as much as people think. They only have authority in the US. There is still every other country that can participate in ICOs, as has been the case for quite some time now. There's also a way that they could crack down on scam ICOs without harming others but they evidently don't wish to do so.
It is helpful but in different and its own way. ICOs has its own value of paying like the cryptocurrency. In such way it might undergo a process not to overtake the SEC in the community. Well we do believe that it will continous to practice the aiming goal is high so that the income will keep going.
The SEC can't do nearly as much as people think. They only have authority in the US. There is still every other country that can participate in ICOs, as has been the case for quite some time now. There's also a way that they could crack down on scam ICOs without harming others but they evidently don't wish to do so.
Well, let's not just take the big step and consider the small step one at a time. I know they can't do it all if they were doing it alone, that's why they(SEC) have to crack down those ICOs one by one. To stop them from what they are doing is not right and sooner some countries next to them will follow their lead then it will expand all over the country. 
SEC plays an important role in the cryptocurrency industry, as their decision to adopt bitcoin ETFs can influence the recovery of the market and the trend change, because many are waiting for this decision. It would be good if the SEC controlled the creation of new projects and revealed scammers, but for me personally it is a mystery what exactly they are interested in.
The more the SEC cracks down on unregistered securities posing as ICOs ,the more the atmosphere in crypto will change .IMO , ICOs will not die but they will definitely have to take a new form and STOs will play a big role. I believe this is a gods thing for the industry.
SEC doesn't help us. It solves the problem of clear scammers. But people can spot them by themselves.
What sec really does is building walls for startups. In IPO it was a big problem to collect money by securities issue. And small startups with great ideas were not allowed to get money from investors. ICO made this barriers disappear.
And the main task of SEC is to block such startups so the market will enter only those projects that have money on this procedure, but they are already big companies, almost always.
SEC will not help you to gain money, it is time to understand it
but at least the SEC can help to filter out illegal projects even though in the end they can not guarantee the profit for investors but we still have hope and can continue to wait until the project really grows and generate huge profits for investors
What about scam projects - we can see if it is clear scam, no SEC required for that. If we want more - we have authoritative persons - they are called ESCROW. They will identify if project is scam and also they will give money only for required purposes(for development and etc.).
SEC is useless in this field, we can do all things by ourselves
I don't care about SEC and I don't wanna know if SEC will help me or not cause I believe that in this crypto world nobody can help you better than yourself. If you wanna keep your money safe, try to become professional trader or investor or just be a bounty hunter or freelancer in this world then everything will be fine without SEC 
.
You don't care about them, but thay would like to take "care" of your money. All of us should take position is this question. Don't stand aside, maybe your decision will be decisive.The more the SEC cracks down on unregistered securities posing as ICOs ,the more the atmosphere in crypto will change .IMO , ICOs will not die but they will definitely have to take a new form and STOs will play a big role. I believe this is a gods thing for the industry.
SEC doesn't help us. It solves the problem of clear scammers. But people can spot them by themselves.
What sec really does is building walls for startups. In IPO it was a big problem to collect money by securities issue. And small startups with great ideas were not allowed to get money from investors. ICO made this barriers disappear.
And the main task of SEC is to block such startups so the market will enter only those projects that have money on this procedure, but they are already big companies, almost always.
SEC will not help you to gain money, it is time to understand it
.it all depends on ourselves, if we want to get more then we must learn to master the market. we can't depend on sec, sec won't help much about our income.
I think the SEC will help the industry. Of course, if they really decide to give the green light to cryptocurrency and allow institutional investors to enter this sphere.
They will put the more restriction that give a limitation to the crypto. I thought that can't be considered as a green light. If they are interesting to give a green light to the crypto and why must they create strict rules to be followed by the crypto issuer? Does it make sense for you?
we all hope for a positive decision of the commission and for the fact that it will give impetus for a new wave of cryptocurrency growth
I think you are right, the days of collecting people's money and tag them as a contributors and not an investors and give them tokens, only for the tokens to be worth nothing and their money gone, I think the space will undergo serious reform.
and the biggest problem is, there are still many lay people who think that what they are buying is useful, even though the fact is that everything they buy using FIAT is only useful if on the same platform, the adoption of crypto that they buy has not yet occupied all the expected aspects and not all platforms can fully support
Crypto should be decentralized and I would be more than happy if the market could find self regulating solutions, but it is not happening for long.
ICO market need regulation because we have to regain the trust of the investors.
I do not expect too much from SEC, would like to see a global solution.
ICO market need regulation because we have to regain the trust of the investors.
I do not expect too much from SEC, would like to see a global solution.
I think the SEC will help the industry. Of course, if they really decide to give the green light to cryptocurrency and allow institutional investors to enter this sphere.
Well if ICOs operate within securites law and can still be successful that's great for crypto. It'd be seen as a legitimate and lucrative way to raise capital.
In my opinion, there are ups and downs regarding with SEC helping to crypto market. It would be advantageous for investors since, scam ICOs will be filtered out in the market making sure that our investments are safe. The disadvantage is that it would be more centralized in a way that we would be giving power to the government.
I think people are capable of making their own decisions, and I mean, if SEC really was about helping ppl, they would not take fines, they would just shut down the criminals. They just fine ppl millions of dollars because they want in on the heist. Let's not kid ourselves.
The more the SEC cracks down on unregistered securities posing as ICOs ,the more the atmosphere in crypto will change .IMO , ICOs will not die but they will definitely have to take a new form and STOs will play a big role. I believe this is a gods thing for the industry.
To think that SEC acts with your best interest in mind is an interesting thing indeed.
Tell exactly, how did Etherdelta's Zack Coburn having to pay $400K help us anyone except line Sec's pocket for work they never did in the first place.
These bureaucrats are not here to help anyone. Just to make sure that they can rip the benefits on the efforts of others. IMO
I think so that they are changing from that scenario and SEC will really play a big role on this move.
They have to keep on cracking down those type of ICOs to secure investors and have that faith regarding crypto investments that are rotating in the web.
They have to keep on cracking down those type of ICOs to secure investors and have that faith regarding crypto investments that are rotating in the web.
The more the SEC cracks down on unregistered securities posing as ICOs ,the more the atmosphere in crypto will change .IMO , ICOs will not die but they will definitely have to take a new form and STOs will play a big role. I believe this is a gods thing for the industry.
Air Token, Paragon been punished for selling to US customers and pretend to be a security, that is for sure kind of fraud and false promises.
More interesting about Mega Watt, who declares bankruptcy today, how many of such we will see more.
The more the SEC cracks down on unregistered securities posing as ICOs ,the more the atmosphere in crypto will change .IMO , ICOs will not die but they will definitely have to take a new form and STOs will play a big role. I believe this is a gods thing for the industry.
How are they going to regulate a market in which the developers do not reveal their identities and in which the creators of most coins can create a coin from any country around the world to try to avoid any legislation by the SEC? You are giving them too much credit they are going to be unable to stop what it's happening and it will depend on us to avoid investing in such terrible projects. The SEC can't do nearly as much as people think. They only have authority in the US. There is still every other country that can participate in ICOs, as has been the case for quite some time now. There's also a way that they could crack down on scam ICOs without harming others but they evidently don't wish to do so.
I think sec would somehow help but on the other hand, they might shutdown too much projects and ICOS that is not really doing bad business. It might affect the cryptospace market and the investors as well to be afraid to invest in much of the project.
In my opinion, there are ups and downs regarding with SEC helping to crypto market. It would be advantageous for investors since, scam ICOs will be filtered out in the market making sure that our investments are safe. The disadvantage is that it would be more centralized in a way that we would be giving power to the government.
I think that utilities tokens have a future and are much more difficult to regulate than security tokens. I believe that utilities tokens will be able to achieve what was intended.
Jump to: