Pages:
Author

Topic: Securing Your Bitcoin with a Dead Man's Switch (In Case of Death) - page 2. (Read 314 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1500
If you are controlling a small amount of bitcoin, then it makes sense! But if your google account is hacked by a hacker, then your bitcoins will be gone too. So it's a huge risk, I must say!

I would prefer to use traditional methods to hand over my bitcoin key to my next generation, through a legal will and a reputed law farm. A reputed law farm is least likely to scam you with your legal documents and that's the traditional method. This way, you will be safe from hackers as well as any online third party providers like Google.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 293
Is this different with what @LoyceV has in this forum? I think it's called a Locktime or something with a lock in it's name. I think it's in this discussion but I can't be bothered to search for it. It's good that there are more of this things, we can finally be prepared when the inevitable happens to us.
Is this what you are talking about? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/using-locktime-for-inheritance-planning-backups-or-gifts-5180850

I think that this is different with the Dead Man Switch, and if it's function is the same, it's much better because you will have more choice as to which one you are going to use. The variety is much better than anything else.
full member
Activity: 868
Merit: 150
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Is this different with what @LoyceV has in this forum? I think it's called a Locktime or something with a lock in it's name. I think it's in this discussion but I can't be bothered to search for it. It's good that there are more of this things, we can finally be prepared when the inevitable happens to us.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
a message (containing your keys)
The problem is that it is going to be very likely that a lot of things go wrong with this third party and it leaks your secrets.
For example their servers may have a bug that sends out the message before the defined time or sends it to more than the defined recipient. The worse case scenario is also their servers getting hacked and your secrets falling into the hands of the hacker.

This is a terrible idea mainly because there are better ways to achieve a "dead man's switch" without putting your funds at risk, such as the locktime mentioned before.
member
Activity: 504
Merit: 57
Dead man’s switch I try to look that out on google features but could find nothing like that did I miss the word, anyway, it’s quite exciting information but I think there are safer and convenient ways to store and pass on your wallet private keys in case of death so that your loved ones can get access to your wallet. Just read through this thread first page you will find better options there.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-happens-to-the-coins-after-your-death-5346148
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 286
It has been an inquiry of many before due to the fact that when one encounters death, his bitcoin will be left on hold forever. It could be a very great help for someone who wants all his hard work go to nothing specially if he is doing it for his family. It might seem unnecessary at some point but it would be a huge deal for those who would like to secure their family's future. Nevertheless, it would still be best if you yourself make an advance plan about it when encounter's an unexpected death.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1598
The only issue is that this isn't a very reliable way of creating your own dead man's switch. I mean, I for example have lots of e-mail addresses I use. In time, I might completely forget that I created this switch and I might move on to another e-mail account without de-activating the switch. After the inactivity time expires, my message will be spread across the recipients.

Second of all, the message shouldn't contain sensitive information or something crucial needed to access an account! Because maybe the recipient's e-mail will at the time be in the wrong hands, so will your funds. Besides this, there are multiple other flaws. Google may not be even working anymore by the time you will be inactive.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
By inputting this information to Google's server, you are inherently trusting them with this information. If your Google account were to be compromised, that data could end up being compromised as well.
So don't trust the third party with your keys. Encrypt your keys, give the encrypted copies to family/friends/heirs/whoever, and use the third party dead man's switch to send out the decryption key. Using an online service is risky though, as others have pointed out above, as you have no guarantees they will still exist or function properly when the times comes. If you want to go down a path like this, then better to store the decryption key in your will or with your lawyer.

I am partial to the locktime solution, since it requires no trust, no third parties, and (provided you set it up correctly) no amount of collusion from your heirs (or anybody else, for that matter) can circumvent the protections you have put in place. You just have to remember to periodically destroy/invalidate and then replace the locktime transactions, and your heir has to make sure they do not lose access to their receiving address.

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
There's no reason to ever trust a third party for keeping your keys. There are far better ways to secure your funds in case of death. Ever heard of locktime?

Once you sign a transaction, you're actually setting when it'll be valid to spend its output(s). So, if you ever want to secure them for your children you could lock them to their address and keep it off-chain until you pass away. They'd then broadcast it.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4418
Crypto Swap Exchange
I wouldn't put sole control of the private key (or funds) with any single entity, that doesn't provide sufficient redundancy in case of a compromise. Rather, I'll prefer having a Multisig of sorts, or a secret sharing mechanism such that it requires more than one form of authentication to spend the funds. For eg. Putting one of the 2-of-3 multisig with a secure service, and giving one of the key to the trusted party. Either that, or I'll have it written up on my will, the unlocking of a certain safe or secured storage upon my death.

There is no reason why you should entrust any of your keys to any centralized party. Or at the very least, it should be encrypted with the password included in the will. There shouldn't be a scenario where a compromise of the secured service results in the complete loss of security.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
If you only read some of the posts in the thread you linked, then you could see that there are several possible solutions on the first page, and it is up to each of us to choose something from what is offered, or to come up with our own unique solution. I personally have a divided opinion about using any online service for this purpose, because there is no guarantee that it will work in xx years, or that the message we sent will not end up in spam where it will remain completely unnoticed and eventually automatically deleted.

I’m not going to talk about what my plan is, I think it’s something that every individual should keep to themselves - but I can say that there are people on this forum who have publicly said they have no plans to leave their coins to anyone - I also agree that it is better to take coins with you to the grave than to leave them to someone who didn’t deserve it.
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 368
"Stop using proprietary software."
Recently on this forum, this post was created: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-happens-to-the-coins-after-your-death-5346148      Thank you, JohnBitCo.

The post discusses what would happen to your Bitcoin in the event that you pass away. We are all very well aware if no one knows your keys or the location of your keys, they will not be able to access your funds.

This means it is imperative to make sure our coins end up in the correct hands in the tragic event that something were to happen to us.

This brings me here...

I recently read an article about creating a Dead-Man's switch to ensure specific people will get specific information if you are not present for a specific amount of time. The idea is that if you were not to log in to a specific email account for a predetermined amount of time, a message (containing your keys) would then be sent to the trusted individuals that you selected.

The Google platform has this feature built into it.

You first need to navigate to 'Inactive Account Management': https://myaccount.google.com/inactive

Then you would need to formulate a plan for when your primary email account is inactive for X amount of time. This includes selecting the recipients and the message itself.

That's it! You may be able to rest easy knowing that if something happened to you, your funds would be secured in the right hands.

...

Notice I said may.

By inputting this information to Google's server, you are inherently trusting them with this information. If your Google account were to be compromised, that data could end up being compromised as well.

So it is important to use this information wisely.   Maybe get creative with it.

Do what you will with this information, but I am sure many of you will be able to put it to good use.

Is anyone familiar with any similar services from a more trusted provider?
Pages:
Jump to: