Pages:
Author

Topic: Seeking feedback/suggestions: Bitcoin Poker Chips from BTCC Mint (Read 609 times)

hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 638
If you want people to use these chips for actual poker games you need to make them less expensive to buy.

No one can play a poker game with 5 chips. And no one is going to pay BTC0.15 for just 10 chips if they want to play a game.

You've priced the purpose out of your product.

How do I buy a 100 chip set for a price that's reasonable. What's a fair premium over the face value of the chips I'm buying? You need to strike a better balance. These are so much more valuable than "shove in a drawer, look at twice a year collectibles".

I look forward to hearing from you!



I know you can't ship loaded to US. 

Why can't they be shipped loaded to the US? They are the same as coins and coins can be shipped in the US. ANACS ships loaded Casascius coins all the time from the US after they've graded the coins.
legendary
Activity: 2433
Merit: 1642
I agree with Bobby that offering low denomination poker chips kind of defeats the purpose.  Right now it costs roughly 100 bits ($0.40) at a minimum to send a transaction.  Some days less, other days it may cost much more.  This means that the current lowest denomination, the 1000 bit chip, would cost roughly 10% of the coin value to redeem and spend.  That is already cost prohibitive, and anything over 10% in network fees would not be worth redeeming IMO. 

I love the idea of more affordable poker chips that can actually be spent and redeemed, however with BTC it's just not possible. 

Bobby, have you considered doing a set with Litecoin? 

Well I guess it depends on where BTC goes in the future? If BTC get's to $15k each I don't think it'll cost 100bits to send a transaction, right? I mean I'm not really buying these or any other collectibles with a small bit of BTC on them to redeem today, or tomorrow. Just to keep for the future where we may or may not see $10k+ per BTC. In which case it's neat to have the lower denoms Smiley.

This.

If you believe that long term BTC will be in 6 figures, the lower denominations are viable. Just not yet from a manufacturing cost perspective.

Viz
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
I liked the denominations as they were released in the first place. Lower than that not sure.

But low denomination coins of any metal would also be great, even 0.1

Freshly mined coins are very interesting but if it has to be a pain for BTCC maybe limit freshly minted BTC to certain minimum denominations.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
I agree with Bobby that offering low denomination poker chips kind of defeats the purpose.  Right now it costs roughly 100 bits ($0.40) at a minimum to send a transaction.  Some days less, other days it may cost much more.  This means that the current lowest denomination, the 1000 bit chip, would cost roughly 10% of the coin value to redeem and spend.  That is already cost prohibitive, and anything over 10% in network fees would not be worth redeeming IMO. 

I love the idea of more affordable poker chips that can actually be spent and redeemed, however with BTC it's just not possible. 

Bobby, have you considered doing a set with Litecoin? 

Well I guess it depends on where BTC goes in the future? If BTC get's to $15k each I don't think it'll cost 100bits to send a transaction, right? I mean I'm not really buying these or any other collectibles with a small bit of BTC on them to redeem today, or tomorrow. Just to keep for the future where we may or may not see $10k+ per BTC. In which case it's neat to have the lower denoms Smiley.
sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 473
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby

Absolutely acceptable.   This isnt for the hobby poker play buying 300 sets at cvs for $40. i mean who buys BTC coins at the store Wink This set however would be exquisite. top quality clay chips typically are priced in the low dollar per chip range.  I play often and typically provide a 650 chip set with a set of plates for higher values (all non denominational) Something as simple as 25 sat, 50 sat, 100 sat,  500 sat, 1k sat. (or whatever makes sense for you) a new micro chip set, that id happily bring to card night.  A lot of the cohorts ive gotten into crypto have been poker players. so please, 13 gram clay, no composite.  Of course whatever premium comes with manufacturing is acceptible, but id love if this was an endless supply thing. if at the end of the night, guys wanna keep their chips rather than cash out, the ability to replenish supply would be fantastic for marketing and ongoing sales. as for redemption....if its a marketing tool and product, why care about redemption? They are still serving a purpose. further, perhaps fees will decrease eventually or even enough chain splits may make redemption worth it.

Regardless, I never thought of use  for redeem. mostly novelty and spread awareness at what is currently a potentially reasonable sum per set. a price under 2k for a for a 500 set (650 set prefered) loaded would be very attractive imo. of course more details needed.  Glad to talk more on this. i have more thoughts.

thanks for the reply



Thanks for the suggestions.

For your 650-chip set, what denominations (in bits) and what amounts of each color/denomination would you recommend, to make up the 650 chips?


thanks,
Bobby

I did out a 650 chip set and the price point wouldn't make sense imo, so Lets look at 500
75    -   .50 USD        125    Bit    White               30.0     USD
200  -   1   USD         250    Bit    Blue               200.0     USD
200  -   5   USD         1250  Bit    Red              1000.0     USD
25    -   20 USD         5000  Bit    Green             500.0     USD

Maybe an optional add on of 100 USD plates (Black)  25000 BIT sold in 5 or 10 packs.

NET 1737.5 USD chip value/loadable BTC value. I like these denominations.  Its a playable amount for a full table .50-.50 NL holdem home game. Add $100 USD plates as an option and it could play 1-2 NL.




More thoughts.  I know you can't ship loaded to US.  However, just a thought.  It would be kinda cool to label the face in FIAT currencies .50, 1, 5, 25,100 but load the appropriate bits relative to conversion ratio to it at the time of minting. Perhaps around the Face rim of the coin "Corresponding ฿ Value loaded at time of minting"  or something more concise, but to that affect.  If done, I would not use your star marking on the holo which denotes when the chips were minted.  This would make people no longer play with old chips.  Let the use of chips loaded at different times act as its own inherent lottery. I proposed this idea with the prospect of it being a usable item.  Yes, Yes, this would mean each chip batch may contain a different amount of bits, but also that at the time of production it was accurate to the true conversion value. (An added time stamp and collectible factor) Over a long enough timeline, they'll all be more valuable than at time of minting....eventually negating the price to redeem - one would hope. - or once crypto is mass accepted - these become the loonies and toonies of the world! Ha!

  I see this approach as a potentially feasibly worthwhile business decision. It would also mean you could continue to produce chips for customers based on their FIAT values.  this way a replacement roll of 50 1 dollar chips will always cost 50 + your fees.  Not .012 + your fees.  As eventually .012฿ will likely be worth far north of the $50...making them more difficult to replace & less likely to be played with/given away equating less returning customers.  At the right prices, Id gladly let friends walk with some chips knowing I can rebuy them with the funds they bought in with.


Trust me I love physical bitcoins, and your chips/blocks. They are all incredibly rewarding to have, hold, and show. However, no bitcoin loaded item is out there that is meant to be used (not meaning redeemed), but used as it the object it is was intended.  Not yet can I purchase something with a physical bitcoin in a normal establishment....but home poker games....these could actually be used and definitely serve towards promotion of crypto and BTCC as a company.  This idea, excites me. Hell, add a nice fat titanium (unloaded) BTCC Dealer token to the mix as an add-on as well.  


NOTE: I'd be equally, perhaps more excited to see this done with Litecoins if that helps ease the transaction cost of redemption. Further, in response to using circulated BTC...I'm not against it.  Hell... Do both. One will be more expensive and collectible, the other cheaper and more usable.  I'm so hyped on this whole idea that if you don't produce it, I may Wink


Thanks for entertaining my enthusiasm.


To be honest, I'm not very convinced about physical bitcoin chips with loaded BTC that's denominated in Fiat amounts.
It's seems quite a hassle and won't have any consistency.

Lower denominations ok... probably the lowest we will go now is 500 bits, or maybe 200 bits if SegWit transactions are cheap to send.  We still need to verify.

Alternative is to create different color chips, all with different denomination labels on front of chips (like "1, 5, 10, 25, 100, 500, 1000" etc), yet with all of them having the same amount of BTC value in them (like 1,000 or 500 bits each). This will make it more affordable to buy a whole 500-count chip set, and still have multiple colors and denominations, for playing poker.

In summary: chip colors go with face-value denominations, but they all do have BTC value in them, and have the same, minimum amount of BTC in them.

What do you all think of that?

thanks,
Bobby






It's not my favorite version of this idea. But if that's what it took for it to get made...I'm still in.
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby

Absolutely acceptable.   This isnt for the hobby poker play buying 300 sets at cvs for $40. i mean who buys BTC coins at the store Wink This set however would be exquisite. top quality clay chips typically are priced in the low dollar per chip range.  I play often and typically provide a 650 chip set with a set of plates for higher values (all non denominational) Something as simple as 25 sat, 50 sat, 100 sat,  500 sat, 1k sat. (or whatever makes sense for you) a new micro chip set, that id happily bring to card night.  A lot of the cohorts ive gotten into crypto have been poker players. so please, 13 gram clay, no composite.  Of course whatever premium comes with manufacturing is acceptible, but id love if this was an endless supply thing. if at the end of the night, guys wanna keep their chips rather than cash out, the ability to replenish supply would be fantastic for marketing and ongoing sales. as for redemption....if its a marketing tool and product, why care about redemption? They are still serving a purpose. further, perhaps fees will decrease eventually or even enough chain splits may make redemption worth it.

Regardless, I never thought of use  for redeem. mostly novelty and spread awareness at what is currently a potentially reasonable sum per set. a price under 2k for a for a 500 set (650 set prefered) loaded would be very attractive imo. of course more details needed.  Glad to talk more on this. i have more thoughts.

thanks for the reply



Thanks for the suggestions.

For your 650-chip set, what denominations (in bits) and what amounts of each color/denomination would you recommend, to make up the 650 chips?


thanks,
Bobby

I did out a 650 chip set and the price point wouldn't make sense imo, so Lets look at 500
75    -   .50 USD        125    Bit    White               30.0     USD
200  -   1   USD         250    Bit    Blue               200.0     USD
200  -   5   USD         1250  Bit    Red              1000.0     USD
25    -   20 USD         5000  Bit    Green             500.0     USD

Maybe an optional add on of 100 USD plates (Black)  25000 BIT sold in 5 or 10 packs.

NET 1737.5 USD chip value/loadable BTC value. I like these denominations.  Its a playable amount for a full table .50-.50 NL holdem home game. Add $100 USD plates as an option and it could play 1-2 NL.




More thoughts.  I know you can't ship loaded to US.  However, just a thought.  It would be kinda cool to label the face in FIAT currencies .50, 1, 5, 25,100 but load the appropriate bits relative to conversion ratio to it at the time of minting. Perhaps around the Face rim of the coin "Corresponding ฿ Value loaded at time of minting"  or something more concise, but to that affect.  If done, I would not use your star marking on the holo which denotes when the chips were minted.  This would make people no longer play with old chips.  Let the use of chips loaded at different times act as its own inherent lottery. I proposed this idea with the prospect of it being a usable item.  Yes, Yes, this would mean each chip batch may contain a different amount of bits, but also that at the time of production it was accurate to the true conversion value. (An added time stamp and collectible factor) Over a long enough timeline, they'll all be more valuable than at time of minting....eventually negating the price to redeem - one would hope. - or once crypto is mass accepted - these become the loonies and toonies of the world! Ha!

  I see this approach as a potentially feasibly worthwhile business decision. It would also mean you could continue to produce chips for customers based on their FIAT values.  this way a replacement roll of 50 1 dollar chips will always cost 50 + your fees.  Not .012 + your fees.  As eventually .012฿ will likely be worth far north of the $50...making them more difficult to replace & less likely to be played with/given away equating less returning customers.  At the right prices, Id gladly let friends walk with some chips knowing I can rebuy them with the funds they bought in with.


Trust me I love physical bitcoins, and your chips/blocks. They are all incredibly rewarding to have, hold, and show. However, no bitcoin loaded item is out there that is meant to be used (not meaning redeemed), but used as it the object it is was intended.  Not yet can I purchase something with a physical bitcoin in a normal establishment....but home poker games....these could actually be used and definitely serve towards promotion of crypto and BTCC as a company.  This idea, excites me. Hell, add a nice fat titanium (unloaded) BTCC Dealer token to the mix as an add-on as well.  


NOTE: I'd be equally, perhaps more excited to see this done with Litecoins if that helps ease the transaction cost of redemption. Further, in response to using circulated BTC...I'm not against it.  Hell... Do both. One will be more expensive and collectible, the other cheaper and more usable.  I'm so hyped on this whole idea that if you don't produce it, I may Wink


Thanks for entertaining my enthusiasm.


To be honest, I'm not very convinced about physical bitcoin chips with loaded BTC that's denominated in Fiat amounts.
It's seems quite a hassle and won't have any consistency.

Lower denominations ok... probably the lowest we will go now is 500 bits, or maybe 200 bits if SegWit transactions are cheap to send.  We still need to verify.

Alternative is to create different color chips, all with different denomination labels on front of chips (like "1, 5, 10, 25, 100, 500, 1000" etc), yet with all of them having the same amount of BTC value in them (like 1,000 or 500 bits each). This will make it more affordable to buy a whole 500-count chip set, and still have multiple colors and denominations, for playing poker.

In summary: chip colors go with face-value denominations, but they all do have BTC value in them, and have the same, minimum amount of BTC in them.

What do you all think of that?

thanks,
Bobby




sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 473
I agree with Bobby that offering low denomination poker chips kind of defeats the purpose.  Right now it costs roughly 100 bits ($0.40) at a minimum to send a transaction.  Some days less, other days it may cost much more.  This means that the current lowest denomination, the 1000 bit chip, would cost roughly 10% of the coin value to redeem and spend.  That is already cost prohibitive, and anything over 10% in network fees would not be worth redeeming IMO. 

I love the idea of more affordable poker chips that can actually be spent and redeemed, however with BTC it's just not possible. 

Bobby, have you considered doing a set with Litecoin? 

Yes, to send a transaction theres the cost, but to import priv key to local wallet...

And it depends what your purpose is.  Mine is not to buy and redeem poker chips. its to play a game i enjoy and talk shit about crypto while doing it.  To promote enthusiasm and awareness.
sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 473
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby

Absolutely acceptable.   This isnt for the hobby poker play buying 300 sets at cvs for $40. i mean who buys BTC coins at the store Wink This set however would be exquisite. top quality clay chips typically are priced in the low dollar per chip range.  I play often and typically provide a 650 chip set with a set of plates for higher values (all non denominational) Something as simple as 25 sat, 50 sat, 100 sat,  500 sat, 1k sat. (or whatever makes sense for you) a new micro chip set, that id happily bring to card night.  A lot of the cohorts ive gotten into crypto have been poker players. so please, 13 gram clay, no composite.  Of course whatever premium comes with manufacturing is acceptible, but id love if this was an endless supply thing. if at the end of the night, guys wanna keep their chips rather than cash out, the ability to replenish supply would be fantastic for marketing and ongoing sales. as for redemption....if its a marketing tool and product, why care about redemption? They are still serving a purpose. further, perhaps fees will decrease eventually or even enough chain splits may make redemption worth it.

Regardless, I never thought of use  for redeem. mostly novelty and spread awareness at what is currently a potentially reasonable sum per set. a price under 2k for a for a 500 set (650 set prefered) loaded would be very attractive imo. of course more details needed.  Glad to talk more on this. i have more thoughts.

thanks for the reply



Thanks for the suggestions.

For your 650-chip set, what denominations (in bits) and what amounts of each color/denomination would you recommend, to make up the 650 chips?


thanks,
Bobby

I did out a 650 chip set and the price point wouldn't make sense imo, so Lets look at 500
75    -   .50 USD        125    Bit    White               30.0     USD
200  -   1   USD         250    Bit    Blue               200.0     USD
200  -   5   USD         1250  Bit    Red              1000.0     USD
25    -   20 USD         5000  Bit    Green             500.0     USD

Maybe an optional add on of 100 USD plates (Black)  25000 BIT sold in 5 or 10 packs.

NET 1737.5 USD chip value/loadable BTC value. I like these denominations.  Its a playable amount for a full table .50-.50 NL holdem home game. Add $100 USD plates as an option and it could play 1-2 NL.




More thoughts.  I know you can't ship loaded to US.  However, just a thought.  It would be kinda cool to label the face in FIAT currencies .50, 1, 5, 25,100 but load the appropriate bits relative to conversion ratio to it at the time of minting. Perhaps around the Face rim of the coin "Corresponding ฿ Value loaded at time of minting"  or something more concise, but to that affect.  If done, I would not use your star marking on the holo which denotes when the chips were minted.  This would make people no longer play with old chips.  Let the use of chips loaded at different times act as its own inherent lottery. I proposed this idea with the prospect of it being a usable item.  Yes, Yes, this would mean each chip batch may contain a different amount of bits, but also that at the time of production it was accurate to the true conversion value. (An added time stamp and collectible factor) Over a long enough timeline, they'll all be more valuable than at time of minting....eventually negating the price to redeem - one would hope. - or once crypto is mass accepted - these become the loonies and toonies of the world! Ha!

  I see this approach as a potentially feasibly worthwhile business decision. It would also mean you could continue to produce chips for customers based on their FIAT values.  this way a replacement roll of 50 1 dollar chips will always cost 50 + your fees.  Not .012 + your fees.  As eventually .012฿ will likely be worth far north of the $50...making them more difficult to replace & less likely to be played with/given away equating less returning customers.  At the right prices, Id gladly let friends walk with some chips knowing I can rebuy them with the funds they bought in with.


Trust me I love physical bitcoins, and your chips/blocks. They are all incredibly rewarding to have, hold, and show. However, no bitcoin loaded item is out there that is meant to be used (not meaning redeemed), but used as it the object it is was intended.  Not yet can I purchase something with a physical bitcoin in a normal establishment....but home poker games....these could actually be used and definitely serve towards promotion of crypto and BTCC as a company.  This idea, excites me. Hell, add a nice fat titanium (unloaded) BTCC Dealer token to the mix as an add-on as well.  


NOTE: I'd be equally, perhaps more excited to see this done with Litecoins if that helps ease the transaction cost of redemption. Further, in response to using circulated BTC...I'm not against it.  Hell... Do both. One will be more expensive and collectible, the other cheaper and more usable.  I'm so hyped on this whole idea that if you don't produce it, I may Wink


Thanks for entertaining my enthusiasm.
hero member
Activity: 943
Merit: 783
In Memory of Zepher
I agree with Bobby that offering low denomination poker chips kind of defeats the purpose.  Right now it costs roughly 100 bits ($0.40) at a minimum to send a transaction.  Some days less, other days it may cost much more.  This means that the current lowest denomination, the 1000 bit chip, would cost roughly 10% of the coin value to redeem and spend.  That is already cost prohibitive, and anything over 10% in network fees would not be worth redeeming IMO. 

I love the idea of more affordable poker chips that can actually be spent and redeemed, however with BTC it's just not possible. 

Bobby, have you considered doing a set with Litecoin? 
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby

Absolutely acceptable.   This isnt for the hobby poker play buying 300 sets at cvs for $40. i mean who buys BTC coins at the store Wink This set however would be exquisite. top quality clay chips typically are priced in the low dollar per chip range.  I play often and typically provide a 650 chip set with a set of plates for higher values (all non denominational) Something as simple as 25 sat, 50 sat, 100 sat,  500 sat, 1k sat. (or whatever makes sense for you) a new micro chip set, that id happily bring to card night.  A lot of the cohorts ive gotten into crypto have been poker players. so please, 13 gram clay, no composite.  Of course whatever premium comes with manufacturing is acceptible, but id love if this was an endless supply thing. if at the end of the night, guys wanna keep their chips rather than cash out, the ability to replenish supply would be fantastic for marketing and ongoing sales. as for redemption....if its a marketing tool and product, why care about redemption? They are still serving a purpose. further, perhaps fees will decrease eventually or even enough chain splits may make redemption worth it.

Regardless, I never thought of use  for redeem. mostly novelty and spread awareness at what is currently a potentially reasonable sum per set. a price under 2k for a for a 500 set (650 set prefered) loaded would be very attractive imo. of course more details needed.  Glad to talk more on this. i have more thoughts.

thanks for the reply



Thanks for the suggestions.

For your 650-chip set, what denominations (in bits) and what amounts of each color/denomination would you recommend, to make up the 650 chips?


thanks,
Bobby
sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 473
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby

Absolutely acceptable.   This isnt for the hobby poker play buying 300 sets at cvs for $40. i mean who buys BTC coins at the store Wink This set however would be exquisite. top quality clay chips typically are priced in the low dollar per chip range.  I play often and typically provide a 650 chip set with a set of plates for higher values (all non denominational) Something as simple as 25 sat, 50 sat, 100 sat,  500 sat, 1k sat. (or whatever makes sense for you) a new micro chip set, that id happily bring to card night.  A lot of the cohorts ive gotten into crypto have been poker players. so please, 13 gram clay, no composite.  Of course whatever premium comes with manufacturing is acceptible, but id love if this was an endless supply thing. if at the end of the night, guys wanna keep their chips rather than cash out, the ability to replenish supply would be fantastic for marketing and ongoing sales. as for redemption....if its a marketing tool and product, why care about redemption? They are still serving a purpose. further, perhaps fees will decrease eventually or even enough chain splits may make redemption worth it.

Regardless, I never thought of use  for redeem. mostly novelty and spread awareness at what is currently a potentially reasonable sum per set. a price under 2k for a for a 500 set (650 set prefered) loaded would be very attractive imo. of course more details needed.  Glad to talk more on this. i have more thoughts.

thanks for the reply
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
I'd love to see some lower denoms for your chips such as the 500bits or 100bits. Help people to break them out and actually play with them without having to worry all too much about them.

I would not mind about them having circulated coins, if this could help you guys bring down cost I'm all for it. Otherwise I am very happy with the chips, extremely high quality and nice feel to them. The colours are nice too Smiley.

Thanks for the compliments!

Yes, we can consider using circulated coins, as that would reduce cost and make logistics easier.
However, see my posts above about my concerns with lower denominations, namely:
- overall price of chips will still be high, and won't be competitive with what you can buy in the market
- lower denominations (500, 200, 100 bits, or less) would be ineffective in terms of eventual redemption & sweeping (even with using SegWit addresses, which might be cheaper with tx fees.)

thanks,
Bobby
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
Quote

To make sure I didn't misunderstand your comment...
0.1 bitcoin is exactly 100,000 bits (1 bitcoin is 1 million bits)

or were you recommending something else?


Of course it's the same; I meant I rather see 0.1 Bitcoin displayed on the chip rather than 100K bits (but like I said it doesn't matter too much). Sorry for the confusing wording. Smiley

Another thing to consider is mixing two of your products -- poker chips and metal coins. A special edition poker chip or other type of card protector (physical object placed on top of your cards while playing) would be really interesting. These usually have a larger diameter than normal chips to distinguish them easily.

Also, is it true you will only ship to China now?! Obviously my first request would be to fix that.  Embarrassed

Thanks for making an awesome product and requesting feedback!



We're using the "bits" standard to promote that, as I firmly believe that Bitcoin prices will go up in the future.

Our poker chips are designed in mind to be complimentary to our titanium coins.  The V-Series titanium One Bitcoin is 43 mm in size, which is larger than our 39 mm chips, and is definitely useful as a card protector.  (I know that because I used it like that last year, when BTC prices was ~$400-$600.  Now, with prices at >$4,000, it's too pricey and too risky to use as a chip protector.)

Happy to hear that you like the product!  I also really like the quality & color combinations of our Bitcoin Chips.  Cheesy

thanks,
Bobby




member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.


The issue is that the eventual selling price of each chip would be several dollars, and that's the overhead on top of whatever the BTC value is in them.

In other words, whatever lower denominations of BTC, the poker chips with BTC loaded would NEVER be priced competitively with regular poker chips you buy at the store.  Would that still be acceptable?

The other issue is that with smaller denominations of BTC, it becomes increasingly ineffective, cost-wise, to redeem them.  As the TX fee alone would constitute a larger and larger portion of the total amount.  (Even if SegWit addresses are used, the fees would be so high!)

thanks,
Bobby
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Quote

To make sure I didn't misunderstand your comment...
0.1 bitcoin is exactly 100,000 bits (1 bitcoin is 1 million bits)

or were you recommending something else?


Of course it's the same; I meant I rather see 0.1 Bitcoin displayed on the chip rather than 100K bits (but like I said it doesn't matter too much). Sorry for the confusing wording. Smiley

Another thing to consider is mixing two of your products -- poker chips and metal coins. A special edition poker chip or other type of card protector (physical object placed on top of your cards while playing) would be really interesting. These usually have a larger diameter than normal chips to distinguish them easily.

Also, is it true you will only ship to China now?! Obviously my first request would be to fix that.  Embarrassed

Thanks for making an awesome product and requesting feedback!
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
I'd love to see some lower denoms for your chips such as the 500bits or 100bits. Help people to break them out and actually play with them without having to worry all too much about them.

I would not mind about them having circulated coins, if this could help you guys bring down cost I'm all for it. Otherwise I am very happy with the chips, extremely high quality and nice feel to them. The colours are nice too Smiley.
sr. member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 473
I'd love to be able to buy a 3-5 color 300/500 piece set that wouldn't break the bank. A truly playable set.
legendary
Activity: 2433
Merit: 1642
Hi Bobby

I think lower denomination chips are a great idea. One of the things that has been cool about your (and Satori) chips has been that they were great little give aways at events and gifts to new people.

Having chips available that fulfil that requirement seem to me to be a good idea. 500, 250, 100, 50 bits etc.

You may well see some from me yet!

Just my 2 satoshis.

Viz

copper member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 254
I would love a chip made out of actual gold. Like the one posted in the other thread
member
Activity: 186
Merit: 79
YEEES! More chips!

At first I thought it would be cool to have an entire set of playable bitcoin chips, but quickly realized it's pretty silly and impractical. Actually I think you shouldn't make too low-denomination chips at all -- let's say 0.1 btc at the very minimum. Also, perhaps the cheaper chips and more expensive chips should be just subtly more distinguishable.

I do prefer denominations of 0.1 bitcoin to 100,000 bits, though don't feel too strongly about this either way.

+1 for newly minted coins! It makes it a lot more appealing to me and helps justify the premium.


Quote
We're happy to say that we're now almost all sold out of our pre-August 1st (pre Bitcoin Cash hard fork) inventory of BTCC Mint's Bitcoin Chips.

Almost sold out?! Is there a secret URL you want to share with us? Pleeease?  Cheesy


To make sure I didn't misunderstand your comment...
0.1 bitcoin is exactly 100,000 bits (1 bitcoin is 1 million bits)

or were you recommending something else?

thanks,
Bobby
Pages:
Jump to: