It is crazy as that was a very huge risk to take honestly. I almost laughed off my chair when I was reading the comments recently dropped by those who read it and I am impressed he still responded. According to him, in response to a comment, he said;
Thanks for the support, but I’m good… I don’t risk money I’m not happy to lose…
But let's face it, that is a whole lot of money to lose, but it is one of those things. I wonder what I would have been doing right now, if I had lose that kind of money.
I believe the segwit2x would have really been a stumbling block to bitcoin's growth which I am happy that was seen pretty fast. I hope the scaling issue is solved but I am still happy this did not pull through as it started getting scary at some point.
Guy took it well, it was a huge gamble and he seems to have understood that going in. He's kind of nonchalant about it, so I'm guessing that if he 1) had the funds to sink $85k into b2x futures and 2) doesn't think the sky is falling now that that has become almost worthless, that he's done well enough and is a sophisticated enough investor to understand the risk/reward here. His lesson is the crypto lesson at large: don't hold anything you aren't prepared to lose entirely. No one seems to acknowledge it, but bitcoin itself could undergo a rapid fall the same way b2x futures did, and for not discernible reason too since it's an asset whose price is based solely on speculation.
\
Actually the fact that it also gives:
1. Fast transactions Worldwide;
2. Relevantly cheap transactions (for big amounts);
3. Limitation of oversupplying;
4. Power consumed cost money, so miners will not sell for loss!
5. Limit of the supply - nobody can bring more then the preset amount (like the tulips) ...
etc...
The futures of b2x where only futures, so when there was no future in witch the b2x will be present, they stop existing.
btc does not have this problem.
Probably has different problem/s but not this.
So at the end they are not the same as the futures b2x....