Pages:
Author

Topic: Seizing Bitcoins Despite Having your Own Private Key. How this Work? - page 2. (Read 335 times)

hero member
Activity: 2212
Merit: 670
Signature designer - start @$10 - PM me!
Certainly I have read stories of the US Governments seizing bitcoins suspected to have been used for criminal activities.
When you're ordered under duress (any threat) to reveal your private key or to force-send your bitcoins, you have only 2 choices: you do it and you're (likely) free from threats, or let it remain secret but you accept the consequences (the threat will be realized) .

Quote
I would be happy if someone explains how this actually works since it is contradicts my first statement of an individual being free from censorship when they have control of their private keys.
You misunderstood the meaning of "free from censorship", that means when you make an onchain transaction, nothing will prevent or block the transfer of bitcoins, it will still arrive at the destination address.
hero member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 887
Livecasino.io
It has already been established that only people who are in control of their own private keys have control of their bitcoin and that the individual may be free from censorship. However, I am learning that it may not be totally true as it is still possible to freeze bitcoins that are held in an external wallet. Certainly I have read stories of the US Governments seizing bitcoins suspected to have been used for criminal activities. I would be happy if someone explains how this actually works since it is contradicts my first statement of an individual being free from censorship when they have control of their private keys.
Pages:
Jump to: