No Utility = not real = no value = pure speculation
But people get paid out in HEX, not ETH no? So your argument is wrong. That said, I do think the original contract lacks utility and that's why I think MAXX finance could surpass HEX in market cap and adoption.
Yes but none of that is worth anything unless you swap for it at liquidity pools. Where do you think the supply on ETH comes from to put up the HEX/ETH liquidity pools? That is the real pay out. HEX is not a pay out. Real payout is ETH. I guess now even more token pairs but I am assuming since they took people's ETH, the first pair must have been HEX/ETH.
And that fits my whole point of utility. If you cannot use a coin/token other than to TRADE for it, it has zero utility.
Can MAXX finance be used to pay for anything at all in this world?
My argument is not wrong, it is semantics.
And you still skipped around the fact that you replied to a 1-year old post
Why lol
Given for free but also sold for eth? That seems confusing but locking the coin and then getting paid is called staking. You mentioned something about ubi, I already heard it before in good dollar. It's a kind of crypto project but they don't have a value until now even the project was released long time ago.
Hex may not have a utility but this is still real and they have value (price) although yes they are purely based on speculation. Many are saying that the coin was a scam. That might be true. The ones that sell the coin early when it was still pumping are lucky but those who didn't, they better sell it now, when the coin still has a value.
What's so difficult to get about that?
HEX was airdropped: free.
You could also obtain it by " investing" ETH : sold.
Then because you couldn't do crap with it, you could only stake it. WOW magic utility.