Pages:
Author

Topic: selling Bitcointalk accounts shouldn't be allowed.. (Read 2480 times)

legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
Facebook accepts "Baggins" as a last name and even doesn't allow some real names (unless they verify their names iirc). Cheesy

Once enough people report you (for anything, not just having a fake name), then you will be asked to provide Facebook your ID. It has happened to me countless times. It is a Facebook policy that you use your real legal name. https://www.facebook.com/help/112146705538576

If you're having trouble entering a name, change your country, language to one that uses that name and then change it back afterwards. That works most of the time.


I don't see why Facebook is not a good comparison in this respect. Facebook may take action against buying/selling, proposing that bitcointalk can consider the same.

Well for one, all of this is in vain as FB accounts are still farmed/bought/sold. And the other is facebook is a RL social media as you call it, very different situation to bitcointalk where a lot of people are anonymous and an identity could change hands without many noticing. People would notice if you sold your FB account right?

That is right. I agree with everything. I don't say bitcointalk.org should do that and allow people to use only their legal names lol. Grin

Just suggesting if FB is doing something to prevent it, bitcointalk can too. Granted it won't be 100% effective. But it gives a better impression on the forum.
Two years ago, I was genuinely surprised when I found that account sales aren't officially restricted. To anyone new, it could give a message that it is accepted in the community[1].

Similarly, there could be additional measures like allowing users to be reported (if there is sufficient reason to believe that the account is purchased/sold, or the owner has undergone a rather sudden change of personality) and even displaying 'the password has been changed recently warning' in a more visible place.



[1] I agree that not restricting does not mean encouraging, but the difference is when you expect something to be restricted and when you realize it is not being restricted and there are no rules against the same, it gives the impression of being a completely ordinary and 'okay to do' activity.

Right now, if an activity farmer gets away with it, the sale is almost guaranteed.

Disclaimer: I don't have first hand experience in trading accounts. This is just what I think and my opinion. As an ex-campaign manager, I have a reasonable idea on how buying/selling accounts affect spam.




Trading accounts is discouraged. I think we could go one more step.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
But its one way of making money
It is. So is identity theft. Should that be allowed as well?

Must transactors involve should have a link on there facebook or other social media accounts. That way we can see if its honest and serious it is more secured and more trust-able that people font want to risk there info with simple scams. Accounts must be at least 1 year old. With many friends.
Not to mention how easy it is to buy a Facebook Account with many friends (it was discussed literally 3 posts before yours), what if a member doesn't use social media? Would they have to sign up for it, gain a lot of friends/follows and wait for a year before they could perform any transactions on this forum? If they didn't want to do this, what would stop them posting some random Facebook user's account and pretending it was them?
In addition to this, one of Bitcoin's main principles is that it is anonymous. This is then ruined if everyone has to post all of their personal information just to do something as simple as transact using it.

So its easy to identify if its legit or not.
The account being legit doesn't necessarily mean the user posting it being legit. I am this Facebook user, can I transact now and be trusted?

Thats just my opinion.
You obviously didn't think it through very well. Hope you enjoy your signature payment!

mine only is that we should just trade with people who got positives trust
You should just trade with people you trust after looking at their history on the forum and evaluating their behavior/trade history. Relying on any other factor to make a judgement for you has the possibility to go very wrong (even with personal evaluation it can still go very wrong, see Master-P).

but i think rare to see them selling accounts.
If you're talking about people selling accounts with positive trust, it happens more than you would expect. It is disgusting.

People would notice if you sold your FB account right?
It would depend on how well you went about hiding you buying it.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
Facebook accepts "Baggins" as a last name and even doesn't allow some real names (unless they verify their names iirc). Cheesy

Once enough people report you (for anything, not just having a fake name), then you will be asked to provide Facebook your ID. It has happened to me countless times. It is a Facebook policy that you use your real legal name. https://www.facebook.com/help/112146705538576

If you're having trouble entering a name, change your country, language to one that uses that name and then change it back afterwards. That works most of the time.


I don't see why Facebook is not a good comparison in this respect. Facebook may take action against buying/selling, proposing that bitcointalk can consider the same.

Well for one, all of this is in vain as FB accounts are still farmed/bought/sold. And the other is facebook is a RL social media as you call it, very different situation to bitcointalk where a lot of people are anonymous and an identity could change hands without many noticing. People would notice if you sold your FB account right?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
But its one way of making money,, maybe there are other questions is, Must transactors involve should have a link on there facebook or other social media accounts. That way we can see if its honest and serious it is more secured and more trust-able that people font want to risk there info with simple scams. Accounts must be at least 1 year old. With many friends. And i think there should be a special way to make an account for dealers. So its easy to identify if its legit or not.

Thats just my opinion. We all know people call always "bend" the rules.

Maybe one per account. Its true but i can just copy a pic from someones fb then use it as mine. Its easy now to fake many things. Even the transac history can sometimes be faked.. mine only is that we should just trade with people who got positives trust but i think rare to see them selling accounts. Maybe one per account
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
But its one way of making money,, maybe there are other questions is, Must transactors involve should have a link on there facebook or other social media accounts. That way we can see if its honest and serious it is more secured and more trust-able that people font want to risk there info with simple scams. Accounts must be at least 1 year old. With many friends. And i think there should be a special way to make an account for dealers. So its easy to identify if its legit or not.

Thats just my opinion. We all know people call always "bend" the rules.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
There is a huge difference between selling your personal Facebook account and farming up likes and whatnot (e.g. accounts with a few thousand "friends") and selling pages. I was referring to the first one. Do you just go out there and sell your personal FB account when you need cash? You don't.

Perhaps Facebook isn't the best example, because FB has a real name policy and also if you sold your personal FB account then your friends would obviously know it was sold and the account would not be worth much, also if it was reported there is a high chance of the account being banned and you may not want your real name associated with the account after it was sold. But people sell their personal accounts on social media websites where they primarily interact with people they don't know in real life, Twitter is a prime example.

Facebook accepts "Baggins" as a last name and even doesn't allow some real names (unless they verify their names iirc). Cheesy
Anyway guess why that policy is there?

The suggestion is whether bitcointalk should take a similar policy to discourage all these farming and selling. (different policy because bct is not a RL social media website rather a bitcoin forum).

I don't see why Facebook is not a good comparison in this respect. Facebook may take action against buying/selling, proposing that bitcointalk can consider the same.


Quote
Do I have an FB account?
Yes.
Do I plan to sell my FB account?
No.
Have I bought my FB account?
No.
Have I bought any FB account?
No.

Same as what we expect an ideal bitcointalk member to answer.
Quote
Do I have an bct account?
Yes.
Do I plan to sell my bct account?
No.
Have I bought my bct account?
No.
Have I bought any bct account?
No.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
There is a huge difference between selling your personal Facebook account and farming up likes and whatnot (e.g. accounts with a few thousand "friends") and selling pages. I was referring to the first one. Do you just go out there and sell your personal FB account when you need cash? You don't.

Perhaps Facebook isn't the best example, because FB has a real name policy and also if you sold your personal FB account then your friends would obviously know it was sold and the account would not be worth much, also if it was reported there is a high chance of the account being banned and you may not want your real name associated with the account after it was sold. But people sell their personal accounts on social media websites where they primarily interact with people they don't know in real life, Twitter is a prime example.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
(do people sell their e.g. 'FB accounts' when they need money? Hint: No.).
While I do agree with you, this is a moot point since it has happened on the forum in the past.

People who farm FB accounts sell them. There is a significant market for FB accounts, especially FB pages that have lots of likes.
example: https://buyaccs.com/en/buy-bulk-facebook-accounts.php
You both got it wrong. Read:
None of my friends in RL have ever considered selling their FB accounts lol. Would you sell your personal fb account?
There is a huge difference between selling your personal Facebook account and farming up likes and whatnot (e.g. accounts with a few thousand "friends") and selling pages. I was referring to the first one. Do you just go out there and sell your personal FB account when you need cash? You don't.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
Exactly. That's a pointless argument (do people sell their e.g. 'FB accounts' when they need money? Hint: No.).

People who farm FB accounts sell them. There is a significant market for FB accounts, especially FB pages that have lots of likes.

example:
https://buyaccs.com/en/buy-bulk-facebook-accounts.php

Just like they sell bitcointalk accounts. There is a huge difference there.
People buy and sell FB accounts, bct accounts, and just about everything.

The argument is, do they sell it because they need money? (Money in the sense an urgent need of cash) If I know anything, it is done sort of as a "business". Farming activity here = getting likes on FB, then selling it.

None of my friends in RL have ever considered selling their FB accounts lol. Would you sell your personal fb account?
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
Exactly. That's a pointless argument (do people sell their e.g. 'FB accounts' when they need money? Hint: No.).

People who farm FB accounts sell them. There is a significant market for FB accounts, especially FB pages that have lots of likes.

example:
https://buyaccs.com/en/buy-bulk-facebook-accounts.php
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 506
I can't vote? because I'm noob?  Huh  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
In one thread a while back you called me a "cunt".
For what I believe is a good reason. You were looking to develop/get help with something that severely damages a business that I have helped others with for years. Regardless, this is not on topic so let's not discuss it here.

Have a good day/night whenever you read this.
You too.

(do people sell their e.g. 'FB accounts' when they need money? Hint: No.).
While I do agree with you, this is a moot point since it has happened on the forum in the past.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 251
Wow. a personal attack. you sure are good at debating here.
There was any debate? I just thought I should point out how hypocritical you're being, maybe hoping you won't pull the same shit for the third time in a month or two. I apologize if I said it harshly.

I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post since it;s just a personal attack.
Apart from, if you read it, I pretty much agreed with you for the rest of my post (apart from I corrected you in a few places you were wrong).

adults don't call people names.
Neither do they change their mind like the weather on their paid signature, coincidentally only when they get punished for spamming.
Adults do read people's posts and reply to their points, regardless of whether said points hurt their feelings or not.

I accept your apology. This hasn't been the first time you called me names. In one thread a while back you called me a "cunt". I can only interpret your posts to be constructed deliberately hurt my feelings. But as I said I accept your apology. Have a good day/night whenever you read this.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
Wow. a personal attack. you sure are good at debating here.
There was any debate? I just thought I should point out how hypocritical you're being, maybe hoping you won't pull the same shit for the third time in a month or two. I apologize if I said it harshly.

I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post since it;s just a personal attack.
Apart from, if you read it, I pretty much agreed with you for the rest of my post (apart from I corrected you in a few places you were wrong).

adults don't call people names.
Neither do they change their mind like the weather on their paid signature, coincidentally only when they get punished for spamming.
Adults do read people's posts and reply to their points, regardless of whether said points hurt their feelings or not.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Moderators are rewarded monetarily for the work they do on the forum by theymos. I don't think you know what you're talking about.
Completely correct.

I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post since it;s just a personal attack.
You just did.

I agree though it may not be correct in all cases. Sometimes the buyer become the seller later.
Banning account sales will mean less account farming for selling.
Imagine it this way: All that accounts (and users that have tried to sell/buy them) that have been traded so far are permanently banned. Would it not have a positive affect?

To be honest, if I need some money, I would just do something in the RL.. Selling my account wouldn't get me a "lot" of money anyway lol
Exactly. That's a pointless argument (do people sell their e.g. 'FB accounts' when they need money? Hint: No.).

Suggestion: Ban account sales from 10th June to 10th August and see how it goes?
I don't think that we can draw to a conclusion from such a specific and small amount of data. In addition to that, this is pointless without permanent bans (IMO).

legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
If the forum just bans account sales, there will be less people who will go ahead and buy an account. There will be less people trying to sell accounts openly. Less accounts going as collateral for loans. Less spam. Less scams.

That is, the entire market for account sales will shrink (demand and supply, though I can't say which will be more or less).
I pointed out above that legit buyers of accounts would potentially get banned if the sale of accounts were to get banned, while the seller of accounts could claim that they got hacked. The forum will generally will not take action unless there is (very) solid evidence, so I believe that the seller would probably get the benefit of the doubt, while the buyer really will not have any explanation as to what they are doing with someone else's account.

Which discourages buying Grin
The only problem I see with that is, as you pointed out there will still be trades going on outside the forum which will be risky (very probable that an escrow will not be used and much more likely to be scammed).

Why do you think this? There are escrows on forum.bitcoin.com, there are escrows on reddit, and I assume that there are escrows on other marketplace-like forums. The forum administration of bitcointalk has zero influence on what is allowed on other forums, and influential members of the community here likely has a diminished level of influence of influence within other communities that are separate from bitcointalk.

Well I am not familiar with forum.bitcoin.com, and that is just my opinion. My point is, if someone Google's it (ignoring the bitcointalk.org results) the next ones may not be one in which the person is active at or familiar with, naturally he will not be aware of the escrow providers there (and the seller may not be very encouraging), and I am sure not many will take some time and do the research.
May be the seller can even claim the account was "hacked" with better chance of success.

Either way, the chances of getting scammed outside the forum are high.



Well the only reason why accounts are being bought and sold are, directly or indirectly, to make useless posts for a campaign or to scam. So why not?

Maybe BadBear and/or theymos and/or another mod can comment on this, however from what I can tell, the account farmers (eg sellers) are worse with the spam then the people buying accounts for signature campaign purposes.

I agree though it may not be correct in all cases. Sometimes the buyer become the seller later.
Banning account sales will mean less account farming for selling.



Quote
One other point that I forgot to mention previously, is that if someone is in need of money (who is not in the business of farming accounts) can potentially raise some money via the sale of their account. If this person does not have this option then, if they are desperate enough they may decide to attempt to pull off a scam to raise the money they need.

To be honest, if I need some money, I would just do something in the RL..
Selling my account wouldn't get me a "lot" of money anyway lol


Suggestion: Ban account sales from 10th June to 10th August and see how it goes?
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 251
Quote
I mean, you do have first hand experience with this point as well. Good to see that whole "I hate signature campaigns and I'm not joining one again" is going well for you too, child.

Wow. a personal attack. you sure are good at debating here. I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post since it;s just a personal attack. Your the child. adults don't call people names.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
How about we make it a policy that the original owner of the account is the true owner and can always claim the account back.
That way if an account is sold the buyer would have the risk of the seller claiming it back, making it too risky for people to buy accounts. I think if that policy were enacted then the amount of sold accounts would plummet. There would be no need to ban sales threads or whatever as it would simply be too risky to buy an account, much like it is too risky to buy a steam account. Those are rarely sold and when they are usually the buyer ends up out of pocket.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
I agree with you on this point. Look at the economics section, and you'll see pointless drivel posted over and over again
I mean, you do have first hand experience with this point as well. Good to see that whole "I hate signature campaigns and I'm not joining one again" is going well for you too, child.

Not necessarily, most search engines are designed to filter out spam/irrelevant content, though this site has a high pagerank.
It's simpler than that. More people that are here spamming bullshit, more people are giving traffic to the site spamming bullshit. It has nothing to do with search engines.
That, and I highly doubt that a search engine will not index any page on this forum because it sees it as spam.

Your suggestion that he is using the donations and the extra money from his own ads to pay the moderators ... is complete nonsense.
Moderators are rewarded monetarily for the work they do on the forum by theymos. I don't think you know what you're talking about.

snip
In reply to this, I believe you're half right. All up until you started trying to shove an unrelated agenda into your point.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
As it stands now, most sold accounts are used for non-scamming purposes

Do you state this from your first hand involvement in Account trading?
Yes as well as my observations of what are clearly sold accounts.

As of a little over a year ago, when I stopped dealing in accounts, virtually none (probably less then 5%) of sold accounts would be used in scam attempts. I think this number might have increased somewhat recently as prices seems to have fallen by a decent amount (making it cheaper to attempt to scam), but I still think the number of sold accounts used in a scam attempt (not necessarily a successful one) is very low. I also suspect that many of the accounts used in scam attempts were controlled by a very small number of people at the time of their scam attempts.
What are "non scamming" purposes? Presumably they involve a financial benefit, so are you referring to signature campaign income?
Yes, primarily for signature deals, however some people seemed to want to get around the posting limits, and some wanted to use their purchased accounts to start a business (and would eventually wind down the business without any kind of scam accusations and/or major controversies).

Quote
if the sale of accounts were disallowed then the buyers who buy accounts for non-scamming purposes would no longer wish to buy accounts

Which would mean that "the non-scamming purpose" market would shrink, or need to be opened up to newbies.

Quote
but the number of accounts for sale would remain the same.

No it wouldn't, it would mean that account farming would be much less attractive because of the danger of all the accounts belonging to the farmer being rendered worthless.
This might be true, I am not sure.

I would think of it this way: The forum is not going to ever limit the number of accounts that someone can have, this is simply against it's political beliefs. If for example someone were to start selling accounts on another forum and/or on reddit, then whenever one of their accounts would show up to the admins as belonging to someone else then the seller could simply claim that they were hacked to avoid all of their accounts getting banned. On the other hand, the one sold account could potentially end up getting banned, which would turn off potential legit buyers.


Quote
Basic economics would imply that the price would go down, reducing the costs to potential scammers

No, because above: supply would drastically reduce.
Unless you're talking about the $10 loan market, does the cost of an account really figure in the number of scams pulled? Imo, no, IYO, probably yes.
It used to be that hero accounts without any kind of trust/reputation (or even an avatar) would sell for well over $1,500, however the cost has since come down significantly due to increased supply of hero accounts, and legendary accounts (as well as all other ranks of accounts) have seen similar declines in prices -- at least from what I have seen. When an account has negative trust, it's value tends to go to nearly zero.

I would ask you this; how many people on here would you the average user, trust with $750 (half of what the cost of hero account used to cost)? How many people would you trust with $130 (the selling price on this auction for a hero account)? If the value of an account goes to nearly zero after a scam attempt is made public, then a potential scammer will both have to risk a higher amount and need to steal a higher amount in order to potentially profit off of an expensive account. Also if someone has a more expensive account, and people know such account is very valuable, then maybe more people will trust the expensive account with $130, however the owner of this account might be able to make $10 off of this trade, and if they repeat this enough times then maybe they will be able to make back the cost of their account.

Tl,dr:

Pros

More difficult for scammers
I am curious to know why you think banning the sale of accounts will make it more difficult for scammers. The banning of accounts will simply move the sale of accounts to other forums and/or reddit. Both of these places will have trusted members within their communities who can act as an escrow service. I really don't think that creating a reddit account and/or an account on some other trading forum is all that difficult.

If the forum just bans account sales, there will be less people who will go ahead and buy an account. There will be less people trying to sell accounts openly. Less accounts going as collateral for loans. Less spam. Less scams.

That is, the entire market for account sales will shrink (demand and supply, though I can't say which will be more or less).
I pointed out above that legit buyers of accounts would potentially get banned if the sale of accounts were to get banned, while the seller of accounts could claim that they got hacked. The forum will generally will not take action unless there is (very) solid evidence, so I believe that the seller would probably get the benefit of the doubt, while the buyer really will not have any explanation as to what they are doing with someone else's account.

 
The only problem I see with that is, as you pointed out there will still be trades going on outside the forum which will be risky (very probable that an escrow will not be used and much more likely to be scammed).
Why do you think this? There are escrows on forum.bitcoin.com, there are escrows on reddit, and I assume that there are escrows on other marketplace-like forums. The forum administration of bitcointalk has zero influence on what is allowed on other forums, and influential members of the community here likely has a diminished level of influence of influence within other communities that are separate from bitcointalk.

Well the only reason why accounts are being bought and sold are, directly or indirectly, to make useless posts for a campaign or to scam. So why not?
Maybe BadBear and/or theymos and/or another mod can comment on this, however from what I can tell, the account farmers (eg sellers) are worse with the spam then the people buying accounts for signature campaign purposes.


One other point that I forgot to mention previously, is that if someone is in need of money (who is not in the business of farming accounts) can potentially raise some money via the sale of their account. If this person does not have this option then, if they are desperate enough they may decide to attempt to pull off a scam to raise the money they need.

Suggestion: Ban account sales from 10th June to 10th August and see how it goes?
[/quote]
Pages:
Jump to: