I'll offer 0.125 BTC with shipping to the UK.
Much higher..
Topic: SELLING MS69 DOGECOIN, ERROR COIN - DIGITALLY - page 2. (Read 2418 times)
Much higher..
I'll offer 0.125 BTC with shipping to the UK.
Only one exists..
Once gone it's really gone forever!
All offers considered..
Once gone it's really gone forever!
All offers considered..
Anyone can add any amount to a coin, so in my opinion the fact that it is over-funded is not worth much, even if the manufacturer did it. If anything, over-funding a coin might lower its value because it may no longer be considered pristine.
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.
Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion.
Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was!
Curious to know, is this lealana overly funded by smoothie?
Nope, it had nothing to do with smoothie at all, it was a buyer-funded holo marked, so that certainly didn't help the sale price, forgot about that, sorry!
edit - I do think your coin looks very nice in the pic though, love seeing all the different graded and ungraded coins around here!
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,
what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?
Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.
Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?
Also seems pricey to me.
I'd say physical mistakes like spelling or manufacturing are more commonly associated with error coins, not double funding.
On bittrex you can currently buy 10,000 doge for 0.005BTC ($1.15).
But it's your coin so you set the asking price
.Price is negotiable.
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,
what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?
Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.
Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?
Also seems pricey to me.
I'd say physical mistakes like spelling or manufacturing are more commonly associated with error coins, not double funding.
On bittrex you can currently buy 10,000 doge for 0.005BTC ($1.15).
But it's your coin so you set the asking price
. I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,
what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?
Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.
Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?
What happens in an exact scenario but a casascius coin instead?
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.
Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion.
Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was!
Curious to know, is this lealana overly funded by smoothie?
What did this coin cost you... around $10?
Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
Is it the only error coin? If so, then I guess I could understand why the price is so high Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
yup, this is the only digitally error dogecoin i know of. But we need CI's confirmation.
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.
Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion.
Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was!
I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?
What did this coin cost you... around $10?
Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
Is it the only error coin? If so, then I guess I could understand why the price is so high Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
What did this coin cost you... around $10?
Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?
Hello All,
Letting go of this one and only MS69 Digitally Errored 2014 Cryptoimperator 10000 doges coin.
Funded twice by creator, total 20000 doges.
Currently asking for 2.5btc (there are no any others HIGHER, LOWER OR EQUAL to ms69 since this is the only digitally errored one)
Letting go of this one and only MS69 Digitally Errored 2014 Cryptoimperator 10000 doges coin.
Funded twice by creator, total 20000 doges.
Currently asking for 2.5btc (there are no any others HIGHER, LOWER OR EQUAL to ms69 since this is the only digitally errored one)
Jump to: