Because people who know nothing about signatures are easily swayed into thinking a shitty signature is a good one. roslin's are a good example of that.
Know nothing about signatures? What the hell does that mean? If anyone here believes their signatures are good when they're infact shitty it's you. Pretty much all of your signatures are very basic and just throw as many colours into the mix and look a complete eyesore. You quite clearly cannot handle not winning these design contests.
I've won 3+ contests, I'm not mad when I lose. I just, can't stand new users falling for the bullshit those users send through PM.
You calling mine shitty? Let's see what you can do sir. Mine are about simplicity and modernism, which is what looks the best imo.
Lol. You're not the Van Gogh of signature campaigns. It's funny how you claim winning signature contests means your designs are good but when others win instead of you it's a different story. I remember you complaining about how "crappy" you thought the winning Silver Wallets sig design was when it was actually a really tastefully done signature that matched their product, and yours was just another trashy multicoloured eyesore. Learn to take criticism or stop crying and slagging everybody else's designs off when you don't win. This is classic sore loser behaviour and coupled with the fact that you think your designs and designing skills are amongst the best indicates you really do seem to have quite a deluded and arrogant opinion about yourself.
Your designs are not unique, nor do they have any real level of quality. You seem to make use of only one feature (various colors) of potential signature features.
Unfortunately this is the type of childish atttitde Candystripes has and it's why anybody with any sense doesn't trust him around here, but of course he can't see this.