Not necessarily. I was opposed to the passage of the bill, and I'm opposed to the concept that the government can force you to buy something you don't want to buy. There is though a question in my mind as to whether health care is truly a special case which necessitates everyone's mandatory involvement. (I haven't definitely answered that question yet for myself.) But repeal now will create chaos, and it's doubtful democrats would let the issue die there and would attempt again, which will further extend the chaos. I was more speaking from a sense of interest as to whether republicans will make a meaningful attempt at repeal when they have the votes to actually do it. When they didn't have the votes, it was all for theater ahead of the midterm elections. Now there will be actual consequences for attempting to repeal, and I'm not sure they will want to risk control of both houses over it. But I'm certainly watching because the strategy of why they act interests me, if not the actual repealing of the law itself.
The solution (repealing Obamacare) to the problem(Obamacare) is not the problem.
I guarantee that repealing causes more disruption than not at this point. It will disrupt business and insurance companies the most as no one knows what to expect any more, and then democrats will try to pass something again, further extending the uncertainty. If you think you repeal this and it just ends and everything is fixed, I think you will be proven mistaken.