Pages:
Author

Topic: Senators push through bill with surprise crypto tax amendment - page 2. (Read 254 times)

legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
I thought they had already implemented tax reporting on transactions larger than $10,000 many months ago.

It's not related to tax reporting. It's about the value of transactions. As said, cash has the same regulations and I guess that banks also send reporting if you make that high amount transactions.
It's sad though, since with this they keep bashing the law abiding citizen, while those who want to hide the huge transactions can still do that, pretty easy, whether it's with fiat or crypto.
That's right, they're very simply borrowing what's already happening with current fiat money transactions by applying it all to crypto. The real question is, as OP says, what could they possibly have written in 2700 pages? And more importantly how long did it take them to write all that stuff?
GPT-3 will certainly have given them a hand.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
I thought they had already implemented tax reporting on transactions larger than $10,000 many months ago.

It's not related to tax reporting. It's about the value of transactions. As said, cash has the same regulations and I guess that banks also send reporting if you make that high amount transactions.
It's sad though, since with this they keep bashing the law abiding citizen, while those who want to hide the huge transactions can still do that, pretty easy, whether it's with fiat or crypto.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1500
I think the crypto community now needs to get ready to embrace such laws around the world where crypto incomes will have to be reported in your tax filing. Few months back, EU lawmakers also made a comment that crypto transactions must be made traceable. So I think more and more countries will take such drastic step to boost their tax income as well as to fight the illegitimate use of cryptos.

It's simple from the mindset of a ruler. No government will be happy to see a parallel monetary system that is not controlled by them. As cryptocurrency is getting more and more popular, expect more stringent legal sanctions to squeeze the juice out of it. Natural and expected.

But here the amendment has not yet been approved. So still a room for breather is available!
Yes they can but not would be fully be implied because the only thing that they could touch is only into those platforms which had been regulated by them on where users could potentially be get taxed since
they could able to trace them up due to KYC but in overall aspect then its just the small part of the picture.

They cant really get a hold for those who do make out transactions which doesnt involved into these platforms and even how hard theyve been pushing a certain bill then it would be somewhat
useless but for users in near future then KYC wouldnt really be a surprising thing.

Government is really that serious when it comes on taxing everything.

That's true! But the crypto community is getting bigger day by day! How many percentage of newcomers are buying from decentralized exchanges? Not a lot of them! Majority of the newcomers are buying from centralized exchanges where KYC is a norm! I can see TV commercials from various centralized crypto exchanges in my country. So these newcomers don't have a place to hide their crypto holdings.

Some early adopters can effectively hide their crypto holdings because of their knowledge of cryptocurrencies. They know the use of Dex, swaps, mixers etc. But that's not very common with the newcomers. That's what government is targeting now!
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The 10k threshold seems odd. Is that per year? Per transaction? What about 100 transactions of 9999 usd ?

Yes.. that's what I was also thinking. Personally I don't have an issue with the 10K limit, as I have never transacted that much in a day. And that will be the case with more than 99% of the cryptocurrency users. Even those who want to transact more can do so using multiple exchanges. For example, if I want to convert $25,000 worth of Bitcoin to Ethereum, I can do it this way - $9,000 in Binance, $9,000 in Huobi and $7,000 in Gate.io. Now they will not report these transactions to the IRS, since the volume is below the threshold.

That said, users from the United States are supposed to report each and every transaction involving cryptocurrency to the IRS (irrespective of the amount). So I don't think that this new law will create any additional headache for them. The issue is for non-US users.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1598
Do not die for Putin
At the end of the day the far west is eventually becoming the west coast. Crypto has a value and like anything else that is traded, is subject to taxation and it has been perhaps too long the times in which IRS and other national equivalents have ignored it. I come from a country where the institution that collects taxes is absolutely rapacious and is perfectly able to go back and collect taxes for the last 5 years. Perhaps, what I mean is that is much better to have it regulated.

The 10k threshold seems odd. Is that per year? Per transaction? What about 100 transactions of 9999 usd ?
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1414
I think the crypto community now needs to get ready to embrace such laws around the world where crypto incomes will have to be reported in your tax filing.

Eventually when crypto gets bigger then everyone will want a piece of it. Trillion of dollars has been going into crypto ever since the pandemic hit most of the countries leaving the interest rate for goverment bond lower than the average so the only way to get some of it back is to tax crypto. In some countries the tax rate is so much lower compared with US so you could still be making some fortune from crypto without having to worry about taxes.

expect more stringent legal sanctions to squeeze the juice out of it.

We are currently in pandemic so expect alot of things to be taxed eventually.
hero member
Activity: 2982
Merit: 790
I think the crypto community now needs to get ready to embrace such laws around the world where crypto incomes will have to be reported in your tax filing. Few months back, EU lawmakers also made a comment that crypto transactions must be made traceable. So I think more and more countries will take such drastic step to boost their tax income as well as to fight the illegitimate use of cryptos.

It's simple from the mindset of a ruler. No government will be happy to see a parallel monetary system that is not controlled by them. As cryptocurrency is getting more and more popular, expect more stringent legal sanctions to squeeze the juice out of it. Natural and expected.

But here the amendment has not yet been approved. So still a room for breather is available!
Yes they can but not would be fully be implied because the only thing that they could touch is only into those platforms which had been regulated by them on where users could potentially be get taxed since
they could able to trace them up due to KYC but in overall aspect then its just the small part of the picture.

They cant really get a hold for those who do make out transactions which doesnt involved into these platforms and even how hard theyve been pushing a certain bill then it would be somewhat
useless but for users in near future then KYC wouldnt really be a surprising thing.

Government is really that serious when it comes on taxing everything.
legendary
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6948
Top Crypto Casino
Quote
In a surprise amendment to a massive bipartisan US infrastructure bill, senators have moved to collect tax on cryptocurrency – requiring transactions of more than $10,000 to be reported to the IRS.
It's not really that surprising to me that a bill like this is being introduced--I've been expecting more regulation, taxes, whatever, for a long time now.  And as far as the $10,000 reporting thing, I believe there is a current requirement for cash transactions at or above that amount to be reported to the IRS, but as far as I know the US doesn't consider bitcoin to be a currency but an asset, and thus it's probably been exempt from that rule. 

I'm not sure what the implications of this will be, assuming it makes it through.  I'm assuming that buying/selling crypto in amounts of $10k and above will have to be reported to the IRS, but beyond that I don't see how it will affect the average person who deals with amounts much less than that in one shot (which is probably a significant proportion of bitcoiners).  We'll see if it becomes law, and I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts on this.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1500
I think the crypto community now needs to get ready to embrace such laws around the world where crypto incomes will have to be reported in your tax filing. Few months back, EU lawmakers also made a comment that crypto transactions must be made traceable. So I think more and more countries will take such drastic step to boost their tax income as well as to fight the illegitimate use of cryptos.

It's simple from the mindset of a ruler. No government will be happy to see a parallel monetary system that is not controlled by them. As cryptocurrency is getting more and more popular, expect more stringent legal sanctions to squeeze the juice out of it. Natural and expected.

But here the amendment has not yet been approved. So still a room for breather is available!
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Quote
In a surprise amendment to a massive bipartisan US infrastructure bill, senators have moved to collect tax on cryptocurrency – requiring transactions of more than $10,000 to be reported to the IRS.

With the amendment approved, the bill will now be presented to the House of Representatives and the US Senate where it could soon be written into law.

The new bill will focus on businesses – such as centralised exchanges (CEX) – creating a legal obligation for them to report transactions of more than $10k on their platforms to the Inland Revenue Service (IRS).

$10,000 transactions are already the standard threshold for IRS reporting requirements, so this latest proposal can be seen as an extension of the information reporting regime into the crypto space.

This follows a Treasury publication earlier in the year that suggested tax-enforcement on crypto assets were necessary in order “to minimise the incentives and opportunity to shift income out of the reporting regime”.

However, the real catalyst for this legislation has been a desperate need to fill a funding gap in the new $550 billion national infrastructure plan, which aims to modernise America’s aging transport and power grid systems.

The IRS has been examining crypto for a while. Last year it added a line about cryptocurrency to its individual tax returns.

Many leaders in the industry have already begun to push back against the new proposals, seeking to build congressional support against a policy that sees crypto as a cash cow.

“It’s hugely problematic – we’re pushing every lever right now to change it,” said Kristin Smith, Director of the Blockchain Center.

However, some industry leaders have welcomed the new tax proposals, pointing out the bill could form a level of protection for cryptocurrency.

“This is long-term super positive, as much as taxes suck,” said Robert Leshner, Founder at Compound Labs.

“Once the US government realises that crypto can pay for infrastructure, it’s going to be less tempting to squash it.”

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/senators-push-bill-surprise-crypto-115026952.html


....



This is a strange news story. I thought they had already implemented tax reporting on transactions larger than $10,000 many months ago.

The infrastructure bill in question is a whopping 2,700 pages long. Its doubtful lawmakers, experts or analysts will have a chance to read everything contained in the bill before its voted on.

If regulation regarding cryptocurrencies were snuck into the bill at the last minute, I would expect it to address stablecoins. Which regulators seemed very concerned about only a short time ago.

Pages:
Jump to: