Topic: Sending Bitcoin through radio waves? (Read 321 times)

It is good news that it has become possible to send bitcoin through radio waves. It is a good development in the fields of technology. This new technology will take time to dominate over the internet but it is happy news that transaction  of cryptocurrency through radio waves has taken a start. I wonder what would be there in the world for the next five or ten years regarding advanced technology.

Of course. Radio waves are essential in areas where there's lack of electricity. It's no wonder why people living in third-world countries use them the most. Now that it's possible to send/receive Bitcoin through radio waves, people from such countries will be able to adopt it at a fast pace. This benefits crypto/Blockchain tech's mainstream adoption as a whole. As far as mining is concerned, I believe it can be easily achieved through alternative energy sources like solar, wind, or even water (hydroelectric power). Nodes and miners constitute the backbone of the Bitcoin network, so as long as there are plenty of them distributed worldwide, we should have nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts

This project I do not know how advanced it is at the moment, but I understand that the Venezuelans who are carrying it out are doing so due to the constant failures of the Venezuelan grid system and due to electrical power failures, this is the reason main thing, but since things in the world can get out of control it is necessary to take reins in this matter, because if a power failure occurs worldwide, all communications can fall and it would be chaos, now the aprte The only thing that really worries about mining is, if communication is achieved, mining would be the main problem.

While it might seem impossible to shut down the whole Internet, governments can simply restrict people from accessing Bitcoin within a specific region/area. It's said that Russia has a restrictive Internet where people can only access certain sites and services allowed by the government. The same is said about China with its Great Firewall. People will be forced to look for other alternatives to get access to Bitcoin. Radio waves are highly accessible, so sending/receiving Bitcoin through them will prove to be revolutionary. This will enable true censorship-resistance as we speak. With radio waves, satellites, and even paper wallets and physical bearer assets (OpenDime, Tangem), Bitcoin will become truly unstoppable. Who knows if governments give up on trying to destroy Bitcoin in the future? Just my opinion

If the trend of segmenting the Internet in the world continues, then perhaps in the future this method will find its regular users.
It would not hurt the cryptocommunity to have such alternative methods and it is better if there are several of them so that no government can influence users of the bitcoin network.

Never thought this was possible with the Lightning Network. It looks pretty cool, but quite difficult to understand. For natural disasters, sending Bitcoin through radio waves is a must. Considering that it's also possible to interact with Bitcoin through satellites, I'd say Bitcoin is virtually unstoppable now.



Yes. That's why I've thought. There will always be a way to get access to Bitcoin, even with government restrictions in play. People can use the TOR network, VPNs, and even the Blockstream satellite to continue using Bitcoin as usual. It's even possible to transact Bitcoin in an off-chain manner through physical bearer assets (like the OpenDime or Tangem) or cold storage wallets (like paper wallets). What governments will only be able to achieve is taking down centralized exchanges in their entirety to help prevent as much people from getting access to Bitcoin with their Fiat. But with decentralized exchanges and/or P2P trading platforms, this is no longer a problem.




Very interesting. But it seems a little complicated to understand. If this works, then more people will be able to get access to Bitcoin (especially in countries where there's no Internet access). The possibilities are endless here. I hope developers and the community work together to make Bitcoin as censorship-resistant as possible. With so many ways you can interact with Bitcoin, I'd say that it'll be here to stay for a very long time.

The only real advantage of radio over internet is that they don't need any address or identifier at all. With internet there is always this possibility for isp or government to identify you. Or then you need ssl + domain and dns is another can of worm and it become difficult to keep everything really air tight. Even tor is not completely fool proof. And bitcoin doesnt need any of this stuff to operate.

The other advantage with radio is they dont require much software layer to operate unlike internet who require a set of base protocole and more elaborated devices to communicate which are always at risk to be compromised. And basic radio device can be very easy and cheap to manufacture.

The very bad point of radio is it can very easily be jammed unless as motionned before there is some kind of central regulation on band use.

The only use of this would be for small set of users really needing strong stealth use of bitcoin on top of the regular use. I dont think it could replace internet for regular bitcoin operations. And by stealth i mean make it hard to even connect you with anykind of bitcoin activity, which is always going to be tricky with internet.

Without thinking about it too much, there shouldn't be too much of a difference to how you send them through the internet now. So, the question of security should theoretically be the equivalent. Its just times have moved on mostly from radios i.e for your average person, therefore its the issue about practicability, and convenience rather than security.

Exactly, radios are slowly descending into extinction for your average person. Mainly only used at certain organizations, emergency services, and hobbyists now. Setting up a local internet even if the government was looking to restrict it would probably be easier because of this reason. At least, if you wanted to be able to send to the most people possible.

You don't need to send no private key over the network, only the transaction with signature that cannot be altered without making it unuseable. Bitcoin protocol doesn't require the channel to be secure to work.

Now clearly it doesn't have any advantage over modern internet or 5G / Wifi or whatever you have, other that it could be made more stealth and work without big internet infrastructure that can potentially be controlled, but if it get there it's probably going to wreck the economy much more than just bitcoin

Even if it is possible, is it secured enough?

I don't know how private key will be protected if we include it in our signature when signing a transaction on radio waves. It sounds a very old technology for army forces centuries ago. Do we really need to do backwards technology after we already have the Internet and Blockchain technology?

Security is most importance so if by any mean, radio waves can be a secured channel broadcast Bitcoin transactions, I won't be against it.

I honestly was not aware of this one but if that's the case then I find it awesome, however I want to know more information about how this kind of thing works. So I would like to ask, would we be able to make transactions without internet connection? so it will be an offline transaction? It could be a big thing if it happen.

Well, in most countries radio frequencies are regulated and restricted within specific broadcast channels. So you might find that the governments might "block" certain frequencies ...if it is circumventing their authority to restrict it's use.

They might change the regulations to stipulate that specific frequencies might only be used for communication and not for data transfer or something like that, to criminalize the use of these technologies to be used for Bitcoin transfers.  

I can still send a verbal coded message with a private key to someone to give them access to coins that I transferred to a specific address. (previously funded address)

That's exactly why this method came up. In case government shuts down the internet, people will have another means to send bitcoin. Read it here,

https://news.bitcoin.com/no-internet-no-problem-how-to-send-bitcoin-by-amateur-radio/

This article is pretty detailed so take your time to read it. So if we suddenly wake up to a fascist regime where everything is controlled, radiowaves can get the job done!

It is very important to remember that when you are considering a method of communication, the hardware that method requires has to be easily available at home and majority of people have to already possess that hardware. For example when bitcoin is used over the internet, majority of people already own a PC or a smart phone to communicate over the internet, so it is the perfect way. But if radio waves, satelite, etc. were to be used then majority of people won't have the equipment already and setting it up would take a lot of effort for them, so it is not favorable.

With spv wallet you could still fetching block headers from several nodes in signal range and check for your tx hash. You would still need a one to one signal for the merkkle branches.

Im not saying the latency would be great and everything but i dont see any reason why it couldnt work.

It how mo(dulators)dem(odulators) works after all

But like step 1 you broadcast your transactions to known stealth nodes in range ( how you know those nodes idk ). Step 2 those node broadcast a block header when there is a new block. Step 3 you ask for merkkle branches for your tx hash, if no answer repeat to one.

Bitcoin protocol already protects against data alteration in itself.

There is a saying that says "do not look for the five legs of the cat," it is possible to be realized but that certain "ideal" conditions would have to exist and in a combination of technologies it would be possible.

The only utility that I see doing it is only for academic¹ purposes of connection infrastructures(e.g.)
__
__

1: Now an academic example, can you imagine transmitting 32 Gbits/s with radio waves?
^{https://pressroom.usc.edu/scientists-twist-radio-beams-to-send-data/}

At the end of all this, the confirmation is not in the hands of the sender and receiver that are on the respective frequency and that is the great detail.

Yes you need un used band as well. Or maybe some guru technique similar to watermarking to hide the signal in another signal.

The idea of encrypting with eligator is not only that nobody can understands it, but it makes it extremely difficult to even know there is a signal at all ( undistinguishable from White noise ).

But i agree that would probably not being extremelt reliable on the long run.

If its to send a tx once in a while from an spv maybe.


But then if the idea is that millions people can send bitcoin transactions to each other with a censored internet and authoritarian government its probably nope ")



Or then you have pigeons

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers


Im sure if you really search you will find plenty of stuff like that :

Hiding Data in Plain Sight:
Undetectable Wireless Communications Through
Pseudo-Noise Asymmetric Shift Keying

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02250


Abstract—Undetectable wireless transmissions are fundamen-
tal to avoid eavesdroppers or censorship by authoritarian gov-
ernments. To address this issue, wireless steganography “hides”
covert information inside primary information by slightly mod-
ifying the transmitted waveform such that primary information
will still be decodable, while covert information will be seen as
noise by agnostic receivers. Since the addition of covert informa-
tion inevitably decreases the SNR of the primary transmission,
a key challenge in wireless steganography is to mathematically
analyze and optimize the impact of the covert channel on the
primary channel as a function of different channel conditions.

encrypting a message so no one else understands it is easy..

having that message then transmit over the airwaves on licence free frequencies but have no one else blasting signals across to disrupt the message is harder.

interference cant be stopped simply by encrypting the signal.

its like speaking another language is easy in a room of people that cant speak it. but try to speak to a friend, when everyone else in the room is speaking over you.
your friend wont hear you even if he knows what language you speak,, theres just too much noise

you need a dedicated private room(licenced frequency) to not have others speak over the top of you so that your friend can hear you

Let say you encrypt the signal with something like eligator who is supposed to be statistically induistaguisable from White noise ?

You need another way to setup the config with the other node like band + pubkey though.

https://www.wftw.nl/

https://www.cryptomuseum.com/spy/fs5000/index.htm

This is for some inspiration

satellite radio waves, cellphone radio waves only work because certain frequencies are only licenced to certain businesses/services.
this stops any interference.

though some agencies can illegally use equipment at frequencies they are not licenced to, to broadcast interference. but this is heavily stopped/sanctioned/punished if found, which makes the use of cellphone range of frequencies and satellite range of frequencies not be attacked by 'scramblers'

ham radios though are not regulated and anyone can just tune in a frequency and scramble/interfere with broadcasts by just pressing the microphone.

if you can get a licenced frequency dedicated to only one purpose where its transmitters are distributed under regulation/penalty of abuse. then you may have a chance.. but by that point. you might as well be using your cellphones dataplan, because then you become a telecommunication company to be 'protected' by the regulations of licences. thus no different than a cellphone company