Pages:
Author

Topic: seriously 14 day bann???? - page 2. (Read 2102 times)

global moderator
Activity: 4046
Merit: 2732
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
March 11, 2015, 03:23:08 AM
#5
You're allowed to reply in Meta just not outside of it during your ban.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
March 11, 2015, 03:18:03 AM
#4
am i allowed to keep replying in this post. dont want your next ban to be for evasion. ive never been in any trouble here and im  not trying to start now
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
March 11, 2015, 03:09:59 AM
#3
heres an idea for ya though, instead of punishing users for trying to make a goddamn dollar, why not punish the freaking campaign managers that basically have users spam the fuck outta the place? 100 posts a week, hmm im pretty sure ppl are gonna try n get those posts any way possible.(bit-x, dadice) if you want reasonable posting then dont have unreasonable requests in the campaigns. sure 100 posts in a week is possible, but from how many users? not very many.

Why punish the sig campaign managers? I agree they should be doing more to curb spam but it's the users who choose to abuse it so you cannot possibly pass the blame on to them. Should the owner of an all You Can Eat restaurant be punished because a greedy pig comes in an eats all the food he possibly can then pukes all over the place, or is that the greedy pigs fault? I make 100 posts a week no problem and there are many others who make much more than that but of course there are always people who try make as many as they can thus diluting their quality but that is a decision they make and have to deal with the consequences.

i also wanna know how ppl like marcotheminer get 10 day bans for basically the same as me and i get 14 days? no justice here at all.

Marco was banned for sending a few unsolicited PMs not spamming the forum.

candy was thrown in my face and im punished for trying to get it.

Learn some restraint then. It's perfectly ok for people to make many posts as long as they put some effort in. If people start slacking and getting lazy then they'll probably get punished but I don't see why everyone should be just because of a few.


look through the yahoo62278 accounts posts. 14 day ban is a bit extreme IMO. as i stated im sure a few posts were spammy, but damn sure not 60 and damn sure not enough to warrant a 14 day ban. im requesting this ban be lifted as if you look at my history ive never done 1 thing wrong til now apparently
global moderator
Activity: 4046
Merit: 2732
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
March 11, 2015, 03:06:01 AM
#2
heres an idea for ya though, instead of punishing users for trying to make a goddamn dollar, why not punish the freaking campaign managers that basically have users spam the fuck outta the place? 100 posts a week, hmm im pretty sure ppl are gonna try n get those posts any way possible.(bit-x, dadice) if you want reasonable posting then dont have unreasonable requests in the campaigns. sure 100 posts in a week is possible, but from how many users? not very many.

Why punish the sig campaign managers? I agree they should be doing more to curb spam but it's the users who choose to abuse it so you cannot possibly pass the blame on to them. Should the owner of an all You Can Eat restaurant be punished because a greedy pig comes in an eats all the food he possibly can then pukes all over the place, or is that the greedy pigs fault? I make 100 posts a week no problem and there are many others who make much more than that but of course there are always people who try make as many as they can thus diluting their quality but that is a decision they make and have to deal with the consequences.

i also wanna know how ppl like marcotheminer get 10 day bans for basically the same as me and i get 14 days? no justice here at all.

Marco was banned for sending a few unsolicited PMs not spamming the forum.

candy was thrown in my face and im punished for trying to get it.

Learn some restraint then. It's perfectly ok for people to make many posts as long as they put some effort in. If people start slacking and getting lazy then they'll probably get punished but I don't see why everyone should be just because of a few.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
March 11, 2015, 02:19:09 AM
#1
making this post because i guess im allowed to only make a post in meta if other account is banned. so i joined the dadice campaign on my yahoo62278 account and got paid for 40% of my 100 posts. 1 liners considered spam, and im not saying some posts couldnt be considered spammy. what i am saying is all posts were on topic, i wasnt posting +1s n bumps or any of that shit.

well today goes by and i made a comment in a thread i made about not being banned for spam, it said basically if my posts were all spam then why am i not banned. and boom 1 of the mods took it upon himself to just throw his power around and give me a 14 day ban. fine ill serve your goddamn ban and deal with the penalties.

heres an idea for ya though, instead of punishing users for trying to make a goddamn dollar, why not punish the freaking campaign managers that basically have users spam the fuck outta the place? 100 posts a week, hmm im pretty sure ppl are gonna try n get those posts any way possible.(bit-x, dadice) if you want reasonable posting then dont have unreasonable requests in the campaigns. sure 100 posts in a week is possible, but from how many users? not very many.

again i stand by the stance that not all my posts were spammy, maybe 20-30 in total of 103. i think a mod read my post and decided to throw his power around. im gonna assume badbear(might be wrong) since he posted in the dadice thread shortly after ndnhc commented on my post.

i also wanna know how ppl like marcotheminer get 10 day bans for basically the same as me and i get 14 days? no justice here at all. candy was thrown in my face and im punished for trying to get it.
Pages:
Jump to: