Topic: ■■ SERIOUSLY... WTF is wrong with NXT.. it's in the ESMA notes. - page 2. (Read 2214 times)

Possible reasons that ESMA focussed so hard on Nxt are that most of the other 2nd gen crypto-platforms are either based on the BTC blockchain, Nxt clones, not actually launched yet, or centralised corporate projects.
As the ESMA are interested in securities, it's only logical for them to choose to look at the most established Asset Exchange/crypto securities platform.
Nxt AE has been running for almost one year now, and the Nxt community has put a lot of hard work into it and the rest of the Nxt eco-system.
This hard work is starting to pay off.......

 

Bernie Madoff ran his scams since the 1960s and was only thrown into prison as late as 2008, so much for the thesis that time disproves something being a scam.

Besides the BCnext pseudonym actually did cut and flee.  This stinks of the same cultist revisionism like that "BCnext's Plan" that was authored by CfB.  Only plan BCnext had was to dump his coin for six figures and flee into the sunset, which he did before December 2013.  If they're going after guys who committed scams back in 2011 - they can slap the book for fraud against people like BCnext and, the Butterfly Labs being an example, Theymos will easily give up those details with a subpoena.  Actually with one subpoenea he can release the details of anybody and anyone who was associated with NXT going all the way back to October 2013, including people who have since moved onto other projects.  They can also look into the people who issued assets without taking any regard for securities law.  Do I also need to remind that the NXT marketplace is full of illicit goods?  So I imagine NXT, if it continues to get bigger and bigger, will get attention from more than just securities officials.




Besides why are NXTers excited about ESMA?  There was a link somewhere which said ESMA was looking at like a dozen other platforms and I imagine many of them have userbases bigger than NXT and are more KYC and securities compliant and that is the platform I would choose if I wanted to host an asset.  ESMA isn't looking to adopt anybody's platform and anybody reading that list can choose from that long list of platforms.  

 When several prominent NXTers fled and disappeared last week and shut down their public social media accounts, I wonder if it had to do with the Butterfly Subpoena or perhaps advance knowledge that ESMA was investigating NXT.  Sure ESMA might be investigating its' use as a platform but they're likely investigating other "details" too.   Doubt they would tolerate the whole IPO that was done to unknown individuals, where nobody was really verified, and it was probably issuing coin to themselves like the Steve Madden fraud that was depicted on Wolf of Wallstreet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apmKYgLtjgQ

Or the numerous alleged inside jobs as Jeff Garzik, a reputable Bitcoin developer, can attest to.

I didn't say that time alone can disprove something as a scam. It's the nature of the technology that its decentralised and thus not really possible to be a scam at this point since it actually exists and functions. Could an individual attempt a scam in someway related to NXT as a technology? Maybe, it wouldn't be easy but having some rogue coder insert something malicious is theoretically possible(as could happen in any project). But of course that's incredibly unlikely in an open source project with multiple developers reviewing code. I guess in that sense any project including Bitcoin or even Linux could have someone attempt to scam people in that way. But even if that happened it still wouldn't mean that the decentralised NXT technology itself is a scam. It's simply not possible for it to be a scam when it already exists and is functioning in a decentralised manner.

Bernie Madoff ran his scams since the 1960s and was only thrown into prison as late as 2008, so much for the thesis that time disproves something being a scam.

It's not really possible for a fairly mature decentralised technology like NXT is to be a scam.

It could have been a scam in 2013 when BCNext was around. But he actually followed through.

lets just assume it was a scam...  how might it play out?

i don't get how people can call a scam a project with such amount of code and development behind.. and new ideas coming out constantly..

i don't get how people can call a scam a project with such amount of code and development behind.. and new ideas coming out constantly..

guys, do you realize what you are talking about?

European Securities and Markets Authority

http://www.finextra.com/finextra-downloads/newsdocs/esma_call_for_evidence.pdf

Just do a search for NXT in that document... it's littered with notes about using NXT as a platform.

I don't know what to believe anymore. is it a scam or is it not? if it is a scam...

its a pretty darn good elaborate one that's for sure.

I only read part of it but looks like NXT was used as an example of a different algorithm than Bitcoin. Another PoS 'coin' could've easily been used for the example.