Wife A marries a guy she's got commonality with and regard for. She's there because she wants to be, her gratification lies in the interaction.
Wife B, who are far more in the majority, marry the guy in return for status and bank. Trophy wife, materialist, gold digger - all leverage sexual favors against (or for) material wealth. There are tons of idiotic girls - both girlfriends and wives - who presume their vaginas hold monetary value or any intrinsic value (outside of procreation) and subsequently insist a guy do doggie tricks for a shot at it. She won't hesitate to lord it over a guy's head like it's not only made of gold but that he can't get it anywhere else.
They obtain property and many times currency in exchange for sex, goes like this: post coitus: omg wah wah I can't pay the electric bill, can you leave me a hundred bucks? Or, if you want to keep track of me, buy me a cell phone and pay the bill. Or, if you want me to come see you, buy me a car...etc.
So if bitcoin is property nothing stops a woman from exchanging sex for it and skirting the whole "sleazy whore" stigma.
Then again, we'll always find the loophole before it's over with, shrewd whores we are one and all muahahah!
But on a serious note, this could've set a hard foundation to legalize "prostitution" or redefine it and since sex isn't illegal, and bitcoin isn't currency, it falls outside the scope so sex for bitcoin seems to have potential for a profitable legitimized business endeavor.
BITCOIN BROTHEL???
Looking forward to seeing how it's treated in light of the recent ruling...and definitely the first court case caught up in it!
