I will improve my qouting skills
As an example: this is how I "recycle" my own text 
Topic: Shamm copy-pasted his own post in order to earn merit (Read 486 times)
Some people do not like the fact that he is posting the same thing multiple times and receiving merit for the posts.
Many a people may not like this type of posting and me too. I prefer share the link or quote previous post. And also i do not think OP would create the topic if the post wasn't merit worthy. Users of the forum may use many technique and that is not any problem if that does not make any spam/scam or something like that. But since Shamm created a topic with a full-fledged guide, it makes sense to share a link to this guide as an answer, and not create the illusion of a lot of help in the form of a detailed answer.
Do you really think the number of times shamm posts the text of his guide affects the amount of help he is giving people? They are receiving the same amount of help regardless of if he posts a link to his thread, or if he writes the text of his thread.I could not find out whats the wrong of this types of post? The content of the post is created by not another person or it has not been copied from another site. All the content is created by the shamm. If the same type of question asked by multiple people then the answer of the question should be same. In this case it is not unethical. Though it could be better if shamm could post the link or quoted the previous post instead of copying the full post which we usually do. And I do not think what is the purpose of the post either that is for merit or something else. We should be aware if anyone post something which might be harmful for the community.
Some people do not like the fact that he is posting the same thing multiple times and receiving merit for the posts.
I could not find out whats the wrong of this types of post? The content of the post is created by not another person or it has not been copied from another site. All the content is created by the shamm. If the same type of question asked by multiple people then the answer of the question should be same. In this case it is not unethical. Though it could be better if shamm could post the link or quoted the previous post instead of copying the full post which we usually do. And I do not think what is the purpose of the post either that is for merit or something else. We should be aware if anyone post something which might be harmful for the community.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Just to clarify something: There is no such thing as "self-plagiarism" just like there's no such thing as "self-escrowing". If you copy/paste or repost something that you, yourself, have written it is by definition not plagiarism. So please, let's stop repeating this meaningless phrase.
Although I'd love to agree with you, my university sees it otherwise, and if I ever want to get my MD, I do have to dance to their tune.
However, even if we call it a different thing, the definition would fit just right in this context: "Quoting you own work over and over again in order to get more citations" (or in this case, merits).
In this case. I agree with you that self-plagiarism is appropriate word since the accused a recycle statement from his old post just to answer similar topic as if it was new a post from him. He is not obligated to answer all question here especially if it's similar to bunch of old thread.
Good thing that this was brought up by OP early before the accused abused this kind of scheme until he rank up. @Shamm is good poster based on the content of his post, he can get merit on appropriate way.
You can still improve your previous posts by adding quote-tags when appropriate.
Thank you LoyceV, I will improve my qouting skills and Sorry also for my mistakes.
In theory, it's nothing wrong I guess
Apart from the small changes in each post, it more or less violates this rule:12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards
There is no such thing as "self-plagiarism"
Finally! I'm amazed this took 11 posts.@Shamm: It's best practice to use the quote-button if you have to copy your own text and use it elsewhere again. Using quote-tags makes it instantly clear you wrote it before, and gives the reader a chance to click it to read the original context.
You can still improve your previous posts by adding quote-tags when appropriate.
Let him live, he did not commit a crime.
The after effect of merit phenomenon. We will discover more idea in the future for sure. So far we have like taking a job of translating whatever you get from any website and be a guide, stretch your post and topics longer so that you get attention, copy a part of your longer text again and again, be a scam buster full time. What is more that I am missing.
Anyway, this could be done just by giving a link as reference. But Shamm decided to give it a go the way he is doing to earn some extra merits. Let him but it would be nice if he don't do it again since there is a talk about it.
I think I am used to it these days.
The after effect of merit phenomenon. We will discover more idea in the future for sure. So far we have like taking a job of translating whatever you get from any website and be a guide, stretch your post and topics longer so that you get attention, copy a part of your longer text again and again, be a scam buster full time. What is more that I am missing.
Anyway, this could be done just by giving a link as reference. But Shamm decided to give it a go the way he is doing to earn some extra merits. Let him but it would be nice if he don't do it again since there is a talk about it.
It is a weird maneuver how a certain breed of new accounts rank up by explaining the dance of how to shitpost without getting banned. It's a pretty common theme these days, but not as offensive as some.
It annoying but I'm ok, I'm ok LOLI think I am used to it these days.
It is a weird maneuver how a certain breed of new accounts rank up by explaining the dance of how to shitpost without getting banned. It's a pretty common theme these days, but not as offensive as some. I caught this account basically plagiarizing something months earlier but let them go with a warning.
I don't like the idea of preparing new accounts for this kind of long-term future on the forum, nor do I find it a meritable success, but oh well, the problem is easily resolved with the Ignore button:
I don't like the idea of preparing new accounts for this kind of long-term future on the forum, nor do I find it a meritable success, but oh well, the problem is easily resolved with the Ignore button:
This person is like, "Welp, guess I gotta crank out a post with everything I know about the Olympics." *cracks knuckles*
Being an athlete you will take time in practice and sometimes they will attempt in accident an surgery before they under go in final stage. Their practice is not an easy and they always check thier physical vital if they are physical fit to perform in the stage. In Olympic game is not just a simple game to execute in the stage a lot of athlete that our opponent that came from different countries an we can socialize them all an we can not assure if were be the luckiest winner can perform and compete the other opponent.
Just to clarify something: There is no such thing as "self-plagiarism" just like there's no such thing as "self-escrowing". If you copy/paste or repost something that you, yourself, have written it is by definition not plagiarism. So please, let's stop repeating this meaningless phrase.
Although I'd love to agree with you, my university sees it otherwise, and if I ever want to get my MD, I do have to dance to their tune.
Quote
However, even if we call it a different thing, the definition would fit just right in this context: "Quoting you own work over and over again in order to get more citations" (or in this case, merits).
He writes content that people clearly find useful. I don't think the amount of merit he receives would be affected by him quoting or citing himself. I think he is probably trying to be helpful to new users. I might compare your argument to someone saying that I write interesting, and helpful posts in order to get merit, and that the fact my posts are interesting and helpful is somehow a bad thing.
that Shamm shouldn't be reposting old posts of his as answers to other members' questions. I also think he understands that now, so hopefully this won't be an ongoing thing with him.
The Pharmacist - see this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58264421he repeats the same thing
But do they ever use the phrase "self-plagiarism"?
They indeed do (wouldn't have used it first place otherwise), it mostly comes up when they talk about research, papers and publishing, but "it's actually a thing"Quote
At the same time, there's this little pissy-mooded, intolerant jerk that's sitting on my shoulder whispering in my ear that he is indeed trying very hard to earn merits and that it isn't outside the realm of possibility that he would employ alt accounts to ask questions that he could then post what look like high-quality, thoughtful answers to.
My sleep and coffeine deprived mind wants to think that way too, and getting to read in a few places about this particular user, without not knowing about his existence before that has raised a few flags back in the morning. I however thought about raising a white flag and letting it go just for a change.PS: I may want to pick your brain about a certain non-related thing in a few minutes
PS2: The M on the MD stands for Masters' in this particular case
Although I'd love to agree with you, my university sees it otherwise, and if I ever want to get my MD, I do have to dance to their tune.
If you're going for a medical degree, props to you (and I mean that). But do they ever use the phrase "self-plagiarism"? It's not my intent to bicker about semantics, even though I started this by doing exactly that, but I'm just tired of people repeating things other people have said or written without thinking, just parroting. Maybe I'm in a pissy mood, maybe I'm being an intolerant jerk, but I see that behavior a lot online and it drives me nuts.However, even if we call it a different thing, the definition would fit just right in this context: "Quoting you own work over and over again in order to get more citations" (or in this case, merits).
Yeah, I get what we're talking about here and I agree that Shamm shouldn't be reposting old posts of his as answers to other members' questions. I also think he understands that now, so hopefully this won't be an ongoing thing with him. At the same time, there's this little pissy-mooded, intolerant jerk that's sitting on my shoulder whispering in my ear that he is indeed trying very hard to earn merits and that it isn't outside the realm of possibility that he would employ alt accounts to ask questions that he could then post what look like high-quality, thoughtful answers to.
But again, there's no hard evidence of that.
Just to clarify something: There is no such thing as "self-plagiarism" just like there's no such thing as "self-escrowing". If you copy/paste or repost something that you, yourself, have written it is by definition not plagiarism. So please, let's stop repeating this meaningless phrase.
Although I'd love to agree with you, my university sees it otherwise, and if I ever want to get my MD, I do have to dance to their tune.
However, even if we call it a different thing, the definition would fit just right in this context: "Quoting you own work over and over again in order to get more citations" (or in this case, merits).
Self-plagiarism
I am aware of the "self-plagiarizing" situation. 
So what we "are dealing with" here is a self-plagiarazing accusation
Just to clarify something: There is no such thing as "self-plagiarism" just like there's no such thing as "self-escrowing". If you copy/paste or repost something that you, yourself, have written it is by definition not plagiarism. So please, let's stop repeating this meaningless phrase.I've got Shamm on ignore, so as far as I'm concerned he can keep doing whatever he likes until he gets punished by the moderators, though I think he'll probably learn his lesson from this thread. I can also see where OP is coming from, because that kind of behavior is exactly what you'd expect from somebody desperately trying to earn merits.
The only problem is that Shamm has a point, i.e., those kinds of requests for help are posted all the time and there's no hard evidence linking Shamm with any of those other accounts. So without such evidence, there's really nothing to do but to give him the benefit of the doubt in this case.
What happened : Shamm copy-pasted his own topic content without adding the original source in order to earn merit of his long written post. Most of the thread starter were a newbie and asking similar questions. It looks odd, there's a chance those thread starter is Shamm alt and then he use his main account Shamm to answer with long written post
You mean @Shamm, create an Alt account and create a similar topic, then: @Shamm answer with the same post method over and over, to get (Merit), from that answer, Uh, uh, what's he doing that for, @Shamm no other way to get (merit), other than that kind of trick, I think it's too low and despicable to do it.He could do it in other, more unique ways.
We may assume that it's Shamm's alt,
No, it's not Alt @Shamm.but we can't be so sure of that unless we can provide proof that we can tell that it is shamm's alt.
I can prove it's the real @Shamm, there are exceptions. if you allow it. 
every Newbies posted the same Thread so my reply is the same also I admit that my mistake is I Only copying my Post then paste it to other post.
In theory, it's nothing wrong I guess as you didn't steal anyone else's work & claimed it as yours; that's none of the offensive IMO & should not be. But posting the same times & times doesn't look good either; instead, you can quote yourself. That would serve both purposes; avoiding posting the same every time & helping the newbie as well.I don't think these accounts are alt of Shamm. If they were, it would be cheating but as I said, these are not probably alt & newbies often post such threads.
Self-plagiarism is not illegal but it is frowned upon doing it many times even if the content in that thread is not the same or the questions asked is not the same. We may assume that it's Shamm's alt but we can't be so sure of that unless we can provide proof that we can tell that it is shamm's alt.
@shamm Even though it's not against the rule since it is your own post. My suggestion is that if you want to help newbies as I noticed that you always reply first to the threads created by newbies then you should quote the original post or provide the link. Just always remember everyone's warning and guidance.
@shamm Even though it's not against the rule since it is your own post. My suggestion is that if you want to help newbies as I noticed that you always reply first to the threads created by newbies then you should quote the original post or provide the link. Just always remember everyone's warning and guidance.
...
Yes sir that's the point here, every Newbies posted the same Thread so my reply is the same also I admit that my mistake is I Only copying my Post then paste it to other post. If you look at my thread some of those are in beginners and help also it's about tutorial and about guidance to Newbies.
---
Dude, what the hell are you even talking about, read the OP when it's the only message so far before you start signature spamming.~
OP mentioned that....
....there's a chance those thread starter is Shamm alt and then he use his main account Shamm to answer with long written post
I just put there that the possibility of an alt is nigh impossible, unless there is a proven connection from the wallet addresses used by those users mentioned in the OP.I am aware of the "self-plagiarizing" situation.
Jump to: