Topic: Shapeshift: Security by nature insecure "I personally trained their staff." - page 3. (Read 1718 times)
April 24, 2016, 04:18:29 PM
ShapeShift should have had a more stringent audit of their new employees before hiring them. I think it's a little harsh saying that the whole system is compromised when in reality there was 1 compromised person with ulterior motives who spoiled the party for everyone. Do you think something like this can happen again if Erik finds other professionals with conscience this time around?
April 24, 2016, 03:57:36 PM
Is this what we learned from Satoshi and Szabo that the purpose of security is insecurity?
That:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4g1t1l/erik_voorhees_looting_of_the_fox_the_story_of/d2dze28
How does a business that gets hacked get to claim they are STILL secure?
I propose that an insecure security solution is not secure.
That:
Quote from: Shapeshift Staff Secucurity trainer
All security solutions have "security leaks"
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4g1t1l/erik_voorhees_looting_of_the_fox_the_story_of/d2dze28
How does a business that gets hacked get to claim they are STILL secure?
I propose that an insecure security solution is not secure.
Jump to: