Topic: Shit Dev not shit coin - page 2. (Read 618 times)
By "shit developers" I presume you mean developers who are inexperienced, who do not care about project development, who misuse funds, who do not follow roadmap, who have no plans to add value to their coins etc. Well, it's true that most projects fail because of such "shit developers" but publishing names on this forum as suggested doesn't curb the issue. Do you know that some developers are impostors with fake profiles? So you might publish a false profile on this forum if we go by your suggestion, just saying.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Shit developers also create an account on the forum; thus they can create new accounts over and over
Shit dev is always equal to shit coin
So always dyor; focus on the basics and invest as you choose
In my own opinion, a token become shitty when the developer abandon it or when it become useless. The problem is almost all the projects has the same platform or most of them copied their platform from other projects. There is no uniqueness and originality that's why people don't entertain it.
Success must come first from the team having a good mindset of course. That’s true if the team abandon the project then its useless and no future at all this is why having a good member on a team is a must, those who can bring the team to the top. Shitcoins despite of having a good team is just a result of no interest from the public, that’s common. A good developer can be hired to build a project, may not be aware of the final intention of the project team. In the end, the project turns shitty, the developers may not have control over the future since they were only hired. Simply put: Unscrupulous team will always birth shitty coin.
Now a bad team is unlikely to be able to raise even more money, since ico can not collect much, and it is very difficult to enter the ieo market you need to be a top developer.
I think it's worth talking about the developers of bad coins. The fact is why the appearance of bad coins and scam projects? The thing is that they understand that they almost never talk about them and no one will know who these developers are and how many bad coins they have already created. Based on this, they feel impunity and do their bad deeds. But if you start talking more about them more often, then there is a high probability that no one will come to them and will not buy their bad coins.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Well, when you see a shit coin, you already see a shit developer because I believe that no good developer would ever allow their project to be turned to shit as they have the strategy to use to sustain the project, when binance started, people would have turned their project to shit, but because they have the right strategy, we could see exactly how great they became, you can even see the example of how they were able to manage their hacking issue which would have made them crumble till date just like cryptopia did, but they handle everything based on the strategy that they have.A developer with good skill and strategy on the project is what we need to be watching out for, these are the things that has been sustaining all those coins you see in the top market.
A good developer can be hired to build a project, may not be aware of the final intention of the project team. In the end, the project turns shitty, the developers may not have control over the future since they were only hired. Simply put: Unscrupulous team will always birth shitty coin.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Products and owners are all the same, and sometimes these developers are anonymous and hiding behind the photoshopped images or profiles they steal from the internet.
But I do like your idea but people will still ask the name of the coin that developers created, because it's easy for us to recall the name of the coin than the developer, as much as it is easy for you to recall the name Nike, than who manage the company.
Many of these anonymous devs are either scammers or incompetent. We need more efficient ways to identify these "shit devs".
but they are the same thing. a shit developer creates a shitcoin.
and the problem is not either of them in my opinion. the problem is the community investing in these shitty projects. if you and i don't buy into the ICO scams, garbage altcoins, fork coins, bitcoin copies, centralized altcions,... then these shitcoins die in their first day instead of staying around for years filling the market with garbage.
You, as always, reason correctly. However...and the problem is not either of them in my opinion. the problem is the community investing in these shitty projects. if you and i don't buy into the ICO scams, garbage altcoins, fork coins, bitcoin copies, centralized altcions,... then these shitcoins die in their first day instead of staying around for years filling the market with garbage.
It is known that people seek profit. No matter what kind of tool it is, it is important that you can make money on it. If the investor realizes that this particular asset can be pumped after the purchase, he buys. No crypto-ideologies, only business. And money, as you know, does not smell.
So, question: will we buy into a new promising altcoin?.. And when there is the next wave of newcomers, it will be clean fuel for all this shit.
i agree. that is unfortunately correct. people's greed always controls this market. that is why we have so many over hyped and over pumped shitcoins among the top 10 altcoins at the moment even though they are purely garbage projects.
i still haven't lost faith in the market though. i believe that if some day finally we see even 1 good altcoin it will grow easily and without big drops.
Of course, the cryptocurrency market is even less optimal. Therefore, any asset in this market is overbought or resold with a high probability. And this is not bad, since the market price always fluctuates around the fundamental value. Thus, we can easily determine where the price will go in the future. We just need to be able to choose the most real projects from a huge pile of shit.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
How is this going to be of any use for the ordinary cryptocurrency users? Cryptocurrencies developed by shit developers will obviously be shitcoins. There is no point in differentiating between these two. The only way to avoid shitcoins is to avoid in investing in any currency, whose development is not over. Many of the existing projects have only an idea, but they will be having very elaborate future plans. Avoid this type of coins.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Spot on. There are many shady people behind raising a coin that's why it's also important to expose them so that they can't create another shit coins and then deceived the investors again.
But the problem is that people are still not DYOR, that's why those shit developers still continue their fraud and malpractice by running shitty coins around and investors gullible enough to shell out their money. Don't patronised them so that they will just be silent and stop what they are doing.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Some of them are with fake profiles or hiding and using from profiles they hire from Fiverr or Facebook, some of them do have an account on Linkedin but there's no guaranty that these are really people, because you can put any kind of skills and they will not verify if you are that experts or you have that kind of position.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
There comes the difficulty. Crypto could be anonymous and most developers prefer not to reveal their identity and most of the scam exchanges uses a fake identity, pictures from the internet and random names. It's actually really easy to identify most scams. If you do that along with ditching the coins with anonymous team and listing the team members and advisers of scams and blacklisting them would prevent us from getting easily scammed.
yeah many new developer that not even know about cryptocurrency and blockchain well. But they know how to make money fast, they using their popularity to attract newbie investor. Sadly there is no ruler or law to ban this kind of developer
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Even some kids have tried to create icos in the past. This time so many amateurs even with zero knowledge only wanna rent someone to create ico and then that will be increasing the list of the crap project and shitcoin. But how to identify the dev is a difficult part in this case because these amateurs use fake identity and history to fool the investors. Even they are faking their skill
i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
You can obviously do that, but it's going to be cyclical though, and you may have pile of names that nobody cares. But then again, the market is overly saturated with ideas that get repeated all over again. That's why there are a lot of shit projects of today because if you are going to look closely, there are no fundamentals behind that project. Just another regular developers who just thinks of scamming investors or listing their tokens on another shit exchanges and then abandon the projects and this goes over and over again. So what we can do is just stop investing on this kind of project so that they will just die down.
A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
Definitely your correct and I agree because the if the developers are shit of course the project are also shit lack of support and improvements how the project coins become successful. Without shit developers nothing shit coins in the list into coin market cap.
There are developers who have developed more than one coin and they keep developing with the intent of raising fund and closing down the project to open another. One of the most effective ways of curtailing this is to ensure that reputable projects from reputable people should only be invested in.
In my own opinion, a token become shitty when the developer abandon it or when it become useless. The problem is almost all the projects has the same platform or most of them copied their platform from other projects. There is no uniqueness and originality that's why people don't entertain it.
Jump to: