The Ukraine thing is different - Russia invaded Ukraine. Trying to take something by force is theft.
I see gay people.
This must be horrible for you.
Topic: Should Alaska be part of Canada or part of Russia - page 2. (Read 891 times)
The Ukraine thing is different - Russia invaded Ukraine. Trying to take something by force is theft.
I see gay people.
This must be horrible for you.
The Ukraine thing is different - Russia invaded Ukraine. Trying to take something by force is theft.
There's no invasion anywhere else but in the western NWO LGBT propaganda. There's a civil war.
Canada should be part of the United States. 
Welcome to the North American Union, we hope you enjoy your stay in the USSA.
Alaska is a valuable asset for our greater good.
Canada should be part of the United States.
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
If we want to be fair, we should first ask native people of Alaska, Inuits, what they think about this idea.
After all, they first came to Alaska, not Russians or Americans.
Maybe, they want to become independent and have their own country?
What about referendum about this issue?
It's selfish to look at Alaska situation only from white people perspective.
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Russia sold Alaska to the United States, go to the library and read about something you want to know. Internet does not always provide all the information appropriately.I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Please tell me the true story then.
The year was 1981...I remember this because it was the year our Lumber Colony's Vice Admiral made his now historical surprise visit to Iowa.
Quote from: TheSoftwoodTimes
Fresh off what's being called the Pre-Post-Antibiotic Era Amazon River Cruise and Economic Summit, the Vice Admiral has courted controversy yet again; this time he's in Iowa. The Vice Admiral's refusal to address the issue of GMO has sparked a media storm abroad (as you can well imagine)...
Politics.
Because Russia sold Alaska, they have no grounds to get it back - money changed hands, and contracts were exchanged.
It is a bit like the Louisiana purchase - the French sold it to the Americans and both sides are content with the deal.
The Ukraine thing is different - Russia invaded Ukraine. Trying to take something by force is theft.
P.S. Most of Siberia was owned for centuries by the Chinese - the Russians stole it from the Chinese in the 19th century. Instead of Russia constantly trying to expand, maybe they should focus on what they have, lest the Chinese deciding to take the territory back.
It is a bit like the Louisiana purchase - the French sold it to the Americans and both sides are content with the deal.
The Ukraine thing is different - Russia invaded Ukraine. Trying to take something by force is theft.
P.S. Most of Siberia was owned for centuries by the Chinese - the Russians stole it from the Chinese in the 19th century. Instead of Russia constantly trying to expand, maybe they should focus on what they have, lest the Chinese deciding to take the territory back.
The USA bought Alaska from the Russians. The Russians actually explored what’s now the West Coast of the USA as far South and what’s named (Fort) Ross, California. This is less than 100 miles from San Francisco, CA, but North of Drake’s Bay. The US man who made the deal has a town named after him, Seward
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Russia sold Alaska to the United States, go to the library and read about something you want to know. Internet does not always provide all the information appropriately.I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Please tell me the true story then.
For all we know there could be a couple of russian cities hiding out in the tundra and we wouldn't be any the wiser. i wonder if russia has any other territories up for sale. we should club together and buy one.
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Russia sold Alaska to the United States, go to the library and read about something you want to know. Internet does not always provide all the information appropriately. I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
If there wasn't Fukushima it would be one of my favorite state... No gmos contaminations, revenue sharing from natural deposits, beautiful landscape, great fishing (once upon a time)... Smart to have decriminalized plants...
I started this thread because of the Ukraine situation, and I am interested in general views of country realignments.
I understand. That's why I wrote "try not no break", because it will be a lot worse if everyone starts to say which area they think should belong to them
I started this thread because of the Ukraine situation, and I am interested in general views of country realignments.
I think it is best at least to try not to brake the borders. Let it be a part of the US if there aren't lots of people against it now
Alaska was part of Russia until 1867, when it was bought by William Seward for the US. This was slightly before Britain created the Dominion of Canada. In March of 2014 a petition was started to demand the return of Alaska to the Russians.
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
I can't see the US allowing any change to occur, but would it be advantageous if it did?
Jump to: