Topic: Should Bitcoin even have a future? - page 9. (Read 58695 times)
in my opinion, Bitcoin have a great future, Indeed bitcoin will become larger and very beneficial for those who have an insight into the incredible bias, but to wait for that all of us should also contribute to the advancement of the bitcoin. Without the help of us it's just all a dream and will never come true, If many people keep using bitcoin and bitcoin become popular, i'm sure bitcoin's future will be good and can be an international currency.
I do not think that the question can even be answered unless you put it in the terms of "should" like you stated, because Bitcoin does have a future. There are to many people involved right now and unless people slowly start falling off, there will be a future for bitcoin and not to many people can stop it.
Yes, because there are some countries that bitcoin is not yet known, time will come bitcoin become most popular in the near future.
all have a good future space, I believe that bitcoin will be up to a good future. bitcoin is a forum that will bring better success and development, bitcoin bite will make all have the future. and has a major contribution to internet technology making it difficult to leave this community because it has become part of today's developed lifestyle.
I can easily believe that bitcoin won't be the one. While the conspiracy three letter agency/bank stuff doesn't turn me on, what could be a more perfect plan than planting the seed, prick the greed of a bunch of fractious techno weenies, let them do all the technical heavy lifting, kill it off themselves and then reap the technical benefits?
yes I am also easily believe that bitcoin and bitcoin ever have a future when will come problem about money ,goods ,else that time customer use bitcoin and he solve the problem and he also solve the problem even a future
I can easily believe that bitcoin won't be the one. While the conspiracy three letter agency/bank stuff doesn't turn me on, what could be a more perfect plan than planting the seed, prick the greed of a bunch of fractious techno weenies, let them do all the technical heavy lifting, kill it off themselves and then reap the technical benefits?
Saya rasa bitcoin harus punya masa depan pasalnya mata uang ini bisa memperbaiki masalah yang ada contohnya pada mata uang kertas , dalam sejarah hal yang sama selalu terjadi pada mata uang baru yang menggantikan mata uang lama . I can easily believe that bitcoin won't be the one. While the conspiracy three letter agency/bank stuff doesn't turn me on, what could be a more perfect plan than planting the seed, prick the greed of a bunch of fractious techno weenies, let them do all the technical heavy lifting, kill it off themselves and then reap the technical benefits?
I strongly believe that has a bright future someday let's just wait for it to happen. and I believe to it because some of my friends serves as prove to me that their lives is more easier that before.
Yes, many many people in the world still do and trust btc
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
Yes we can see it clearly from now that bitcoin has a future. From social media to forums we see that many bitcoin user become rich at a specific time. Many will give thanks to know bitcoin. The remarkable change in their life will mark forever. And many will never let bitcoin dissappear for sure. Like me even if otwas banned by country I will find ways to connect to bitcoin again.
Bitcoin should have a great future. A program that has created and generated opportunists, jobs, and given people privilege earn good cash to individuals should be given the whole future. It's one of the best payment methods available, spreading bitcoin to the globe is what will give it a stand in the future.
There is still no legal crypt foundation in the world: no direct prohibitions, no permits. And Belarus seems to be taking the first step in this direction. A special interdepartmental working group with the participation of the Administration of the High-Tech Park is preparing a draft regulatory legal act on the digital transformation of the Belarusian economy. The block network is planned to be used to maintain registers of bank guarantees and on the securities market.
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
Yes, I have to deal with bitcoin because I have seen a proved that my friend lives a bit because of bitcoin. As long as he does not have life now he has bought a lively "house for bitcoin as I can say it's important bitcoin is definitely the future.
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
Bitcoin can save future it answer everything for our daily living and lives gives us opportunity to anything around us 
I'm sure that bitcoin prices will continue to increase and this makes bitcoin a very promising investment, this is because with bitcoin, all transactions around the world become easier, making users continue to increase and auto bitcoin future improves.
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
Our country all over the world experiencing new technologies that could help us to work easily. One of this is by using bitcoin ,no worries when you are paying bills .Easiest transaction than other and you can earned money at home by doing bitcoin. 
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
It was very obvious now a days that banks are really afraid of cryptocurrencies growth therefore they are bribing some media's to create a black propaganda in order to decrease the investors of bitcoins and that is also one of the reason why cryptocurrencies are being banned in other countries.
Now that I've gotten your attention, I promise there's a method to my madness. We've all been arguing over Bitcoin XT and (now) Bitcoin Classic while ignoring that there's a real world outside of Bitcointalk and the endless schemes to get more Bitcoin. In the grand scheme of things, it's not even really all that important whether Bitcoin stands a chance of destroying traditional banks as long as Bitcoin or whatever replaces Bitcoin if it stumbles can carve out its own niche. But we're marching toward a world where things are going to be moving pretty fast in matters that don't necessarily have to do with economics and finances, except for maybe who's going to be holding the moneybags. Is it going to be us, or is it going to be the big banks, or is it going to be some Third World tyrant who may have gotten a little too big for his britches and doesn't have a graceful way out? What I'm getting at here is, are we absolutely sure we're making all the right strategic moves to make sure cryptocurrencies have a meaningful, sustainable future instead of just being seen as a funny little gimmick that went the way of Beanie Babies in a few decades? Should we be making alliances with other up-and-coming, innovative technologies to make sure we can achieve our long-term goals? This is something we'll have to consider if we want Bitcoin to have any kind of a future.
We have a future for bitcoin it can help us ave from financial problems we buy all we want because of it 
Of course, everyone has been hoping greatly for Bitcoin to be better and better in the future. In the future Bitcoin should be more successful and known to everyone all over the world, But with a lot of hope people with all this no one will know what happens with Bitcoin in the future.
It is certainly possible to make alliance with our future innovate technology because of the bitcoin future assured that it is really right for the government to take control can lead in differently or government attempt on a bitcoin anonymous transaction in disguise in looking at the terrorist funds .we are a all ready successful envisioned and real need is to get the right bitcoin really hits mainstream or should be decent the adaptation of all the world. 
Bitcoin will have a future, there is already too much invested in it for it to disappear without a fight. Banks have been opposed to Bitcoin from the start, but that hasn't slowed down its growth. If it faces more opposition in the future, it might take some hits but I don't see it getting knocked out. Also, there are various camps forming: Countries strongly in favor of Bitcoin, like Japan, Switzerland, Estonia and a ton of other countries. Then those opposed like China. Most other countries are on the fence or do not have a strong stance either way. So regulation will not kill Bitcoin. If it is unfavorable in some countries, it will just flourish more in the places that are more friendly. Bitcoin will have to adapt and see technological improvements to continue to advance. But either way, Bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies are not going anywhere.
Jump to: