Topic: should it be illegal to use certain types of animals for experiments? (Read 204 times)

It would be best for all the people involved in this business and who support it to get on their knees and repent before the day is out and before there is no tomorrow when the Almighty GOD of Abraham commands their spirit to return and their living breath ceases so they become putrid flesh for if sent to Hell what awaits is what they have chosen on earth while their victims rest in Heavenly bliss.

The waiting room in hell is eternal and their surgeries and humiliation will be unlike anything they could possibly imagine. Some will have the same vivisections carried out on them in front of the queue while those awaiting watch the horrors that they are about to face in accordance to how they treated their victims. Do they understand why they have a new day and why everyday is another chance to stop and repent and sin no more  ....until there is no more new days?

Atheists and absolute atheists will fare the worst because they took comfort in the thought that there would be no judgement but how foolish it is to waste another day in this state of disassociation much akin to the nihilist who has given up upon existence. At least such a nihilist may carry such despair and do no harm and be excused but how will it fare for he who uses any excuse to do harm to another creature?

When the angels took wives and sin was abundant many sins were commited and the offspring of such their unclean spirits cannot rest until judgement and the fires are reserved for them but mankind who sinned against the earth and each other and the animals will fare badly.

Animals aren't given the freedom to choose whether they are tortured and mutilated so an improved sunscreen can be developed so it should not be acceptable however human adults of sound mind and body can choose to volunteer for these experiments if they wish or either that stop developing new products that require such depraved practices and only develop products that can be either tested with human subjects or computational modeling.

Anyone who thinks it is okay to remove the vocal chords of an innocent animal so it doesn't scream out loudly in pain while it has chemicals burn it to death or near death before it is killed off is a sick, perverted and depraved individual that needs to be kept away from normal people who do not wish to torture, mutilate and humiliate other creatures.

The psychopaths who do such experiments during the day and return home to their normal family life are undoubtly capable of the most depraved and sadistic acts  to people if society did not keep them in check and this is their way of venting their repressed, perverted and depraved tendencies that they have within their psyche.

Of course they will rationalise their behaviour like any other psychopath. Afterall that is what psychopaths do.

Sometimes sacrifices are required to be made for a greater good in the future, it becomes inevitable to experiment with a very few to save the larger society. If an experiment to find a lasting solution to a problem that is plaguing humanity needs to use an animal as a test, then it's sadly understandable. All lives are important but human lives are more precious than that of animals so the experts can use animals for trials, instead of people to die. Where it's wrong is if animals are killed unjustly, not for food or experiments to save humanity or fellow animals, but for sports or cruelty. Life is not fair, sometimes we need to make difficult sacrifices for the majority to survive.

There might be a place for animal research, but sadly it's become just a way for medical quacks to pad their resumes so they can claim to have coveted "lab experience"

Some of the dumb experiments they run involve torturing animals, such as burning them alive, sometimes hundreds of subjects, to test how they respond to burn creams. 

The first step of some of these experiments involves removing the animals' vocal chords so lab techs don't have to hear their screaming.  Speaks for itself.

MBR is Marshall Bio Resources, an American company which owns MBR Acres, an industrial puppy breeding facility in Wyton, Cambridgeshire.

 

2,000 Beagle puppies a year are bred on this site alone (and many thousands more in other countries), and every single one of these dogs is bred solely for the vivisection industry.

 

The dogs are warehoused in converted pig pens and metal sheds. Inside the sheds are bitches in barren pens to produce litter after litter of pups - no checks are made on the numbers of litters they are forced to endure as the Home Office does NOT collect or allow the public to know that information. This is illegal for any other dog breeder, but apparently it’s OK for MBR because it’s for vivisection. And the pups? At just 12 to 16 weeks old they are taken from the sheds and put into a crate, loaded into the back of a Luton van, and driven to a laboratory. MBR also sells off mums and pups together to labs for experiments.

 

That’s right - unweaned pups and their mums. They will be kept in solitary confinement all of the time, apart from when they are taken out to have poison poured down their throat via a tube, or some equally vile experiment such as inhaling chemicals through a mask or being burned. Until they die. Or until they don’t die and then they are killed.

 

They will then be cut up to see what the results of the chemicals or other substance has had on their tiny body. And no, you’re not reading some gothic horror novel, this is happening today, at a venue not too far from you, here in the UK.

 

Our country kills millions of animals every year for experiments that have a failure rate of over 96%. Why? Money. This makes an awful lot of money for MBR, plus of course money is paid to the contract testing labs and the people who carry out these barbaric procedures. All when there are already tests available which can replace the dogs and other animals - the replacements are called NAMs: Non Animal Methods. That’s why we are fighting to Free the MBR Beagles, and all the other animals subjected to the vilest treatment and most horrible lives that you can imagine.



There is absolutely no doubt about it. Anyone capable of carrying out such experiments on these creatures are very much capable of doing the same to humans or children if they were working in nazi concentration camps and anyone who supports such experiments are equally capable of supporting the heinous activities of the demons who carried out experiments on men ,women and especially children in the nazi concentration camps.

Such people should not be allowed to breathe the same air as the rest of humanity. There can no longer be any tolerance for people who use violence and cruelty upon innocent creatures or humans.

Dr. Andre Menache, MRCVS, holds qualifications in both zoology and veterinary medicine and has been a dedicated advocate against animal experimentation since 1980 when he was a veterinary student in South Africa. His significant contributions include influencing the amendment of the Helsinki Declaration in 2000, advocating for the broader adoption of non-animal research methods.

Dr. Andre Menache says the scientific evidence to show that animal models are not predictive for humans is rock solid.


Humans should volunteer to be tested on for any products used by humans.

If we would live in perfect world, such experiments shouldn't be allowed. But unfortunately life isn't perfect. If these thing would be banned, what alternative for it it would be. You can't release things without testing or test it on humans. So, you have to sacrifice something.
Experiments for scientific purposes is needed, but when it comes to commercial things, like said above - testing new shampoo, then I'm against it.

Passing on the cruelty should be illegal.

Merkley from The Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine (PCRM) details the horrific animal experiments that have killed 15 monkeys (that we know of) thus far. What's more, they've insinuated that human trials are on the horizon.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/qa1t0ugQvyiV/

https://old.bitchute.com/video/we8t3mxQvJDB/

https://tv.gab.com/channel/ladybee/view/neuralink-what-elon-musk-doesnt-want-6218abb32d4cc1e467c6712c

https://www.rokfin.com/post/75496/Elon-Musks-Cruel-Neuralink-Experiments-Kill-15th-MONKEY--Ryan-Merkley-With-PCRM


https://www.activistpost.com/2022/02/elon-musks-cruel-neuralink-experiments-kills-15th-monkey-are-humans-next.html





The UK police were basically working as a private security firm for MBR ACRES (Huntingdon, PE282DT) helping to escort beagle puppies in Luton vans to vivisection companies. Over 500k worth of our tax has paid for riot vans to turn up to help facilitate the deaths of these puppies (gained from freedom of information act). The courier vans come from a company called Impex that currently have protestors monitoring the situation. One of the biggest vivisection companies in the UK is called Labcorp where van loads of these puppies will head off too to have pesticide poisoning done to them and other disgusting experiments.

Thanks to https://www.youtube.com/c/MadAboutAnimals for the informative video. Please check out their channel.

Thanks for watching, I am not doing this for views, financial gain or likes, follows, its just to spread awareness and for the animals (FTA).

Read more about Camp Beagle for more information and updates here:

https://www.thecampbeagle.co.uk





H1N1 & VIVISECTION

Our government demands that we test all drugs on animals prior to human use. The animal testing provides no accuracy about what these chemicals do to humans. Researchers even admit that applying animal data to humans is a "leap of faith.......and very profitable hence it continues.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/NIveRr92opL7/






UNDERCOVER Animal Testing (vivisection)



https://old.bitchute.com/video/6qsOH2wZ5X2b/




Germans EXPOSE cruel Animal Laboratory

https://old.bitchute.com/video/EBxoa5XdY0BL/





SHOCKING UNDERCOVER INVESTIGATION IN A LAB IN GERMANY



https://old.bitchute.com/video/UAhREaIkGQtb/

@franky1 what you said are your personal views. There are still many scientists who see Africa as a laboratory for risky medical experiments. In 2020 two doctors from France suggested that potential vaccines for coronavirus should be tested first in Africa. One will begin to wonder why these European doctors gave such an idea. I suspect that this practice is common within their medical profession. Was COVID-19 discovered in Africa? They would have suggested China and not Africa. Human right is segregational and we shouldn't hide from it. These French doctors also affirmed that they have tried such experiments for AIDS studies in Africa. Some people still see Africa as a medical experiment laboratory.

I am sure that these dangerous experiments are ongoing but it is hidden from the public. After all, it is the West who controls the media. You will hardly read that the world-celebrated German scientist Robert Koch had research concentration camps in Africa where he conducted experiments for the benefit of Germany. His therapeutical and pharmacological research sometimes includes punctuating the eyes, ears, and limbs of test subjects with needles to extract samples. Even on Wikipedia, his atrocities in Africa were not included.

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2020/10/6/when-africa-was-a-german-laboratory

NOTE> Anyone who is of a very sensitive nature probably best not watch this video of how animals and dogs in particluar are treated at this facility. These are the facilities that test your fancy vaccines and other products killing hundreds of dogs daily. At 2 minutes is particularly disturbing considering these people freely walk among us living normal lives outside their jobs similiar to how the SS or Dr Mengle was quite "normal" in his respective society. I might remind you that some of the most notorious and depraved humans act quite "normal".

Anyone who supports animal cruelty needs to meet their maker for judgement asap.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huntingdon_Life_Sciences

https://old.bitchute.com/video/lsMZm9Al7lnT/




Controversies

Huntingdon is criticised by animal rights and animal welfare groups for using animals in research, for instances of animal abuse and for the wide range of substances it tests on animals, particularly non-medical products. It is claimed by SHAC that 500 animals died every day at HLS (182,500 a year),[13] a figure at odds with HLS' published numbers.

Huntingdon's labs were infiltrated by undercover animal rights activists in 1997 in the UK and in 1998 in the US.

In 1997, film secretly recorded inside HLS in the UK by BUAV and subsequently broadcast on Channel 4 television as "It's a Dog's Life", showed serious breaches of animal-protection laws, including a beagle puppy being held up by the scruff of the neck and repeatedly punched in the face, and animals being taunted.[14]

The laboratory technicians responsible were suspended from HLS the day after the broadcast. All three were later dismissed.[15] Two of the men seen hitting and shaking dogs were found guilty under the Protection of Animals Act 1911 of "cruelly terrifying dogs." It was the first time laboratory technicians had been prosecuted for animal cruelty in the UK. HLS admitted that the technicians' behaviour was deplorable and a new management team was introduced the following year which, according to The Daily Telegraph, "introduced greater openness and new training methods."[15]

In 1998, an undercover investigator for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) used a camera hidden in her glasses to make 50 hours of videotape of the HLS laboratories in Princeton, New Jersey. She also made four 90-minute audiotapes, photocopied 8,000 company documents, and copied the company's client list. According to PETA some of the film she shot showed a monkey being dissected while still alive and conscious. The president of HLS in New Jersey, Alan Staple, said the monkey was alive but sedated during the dissection.[16]

A 2001 article from The Resurgence Trust stated that HLS obtained a "gagging order" in the US that prevents PETA from publicising or talking about any of the information that they discovered. The order also prevented PETA from communicating with the American Department of Agriculture, which had been going to investigate the evidence.[

As an aside, Corvids are granted 'mammal status' (by \?\?\?) on the basis that they have an unusually high level of intellect among the birds.  This they achieved somehow with a notably 'inferior' brain structure.  A hypothesis as to how this came about is that they spy on each other, in complex geo-spacial landscape with a long-ish timespan component, in order to steal food, and try to mitigate the losses from others spying on them.  They do need to 'see through the eyes of others' how others perceive them.

I think there should probably be strict limitations on animal testing for things like shampoo & other vanity type products. Testing for new experimental cancer treatments etc should be allowed on any animal though in my opinion. It’s a very sensitive subject & you’re going to find a lot of very different views.

Using animals for experiments is not easy and cannot be arbitrary because there are rules regarding animal ethics and animal welfare. And not just any animal is used for experiments, because rare and protected animals certainly cannot be used for experiments. The reason for using experimental objects other than humans is because conducting experiments on animals will produce good results. For example, mice, these animals reproduce quickly and are small in size so they do not require a lot of space. With animals, scientists can manipulate genes to study diseases, and this is not easy to do on humans because human DNA cannot be easily changed and there must be many general agreements that say it is unethical. And as far as I know, if you want to use animals for experiments, try not to hurt the animal. So conducting experiments on animals as long as they are carried out according to the rules is permissible.

the narrative might have changed but there are still cases where people gets trafficked and used for some random experimental purposes even though it's not as open as it use to be during the slave trade era.

Animal right is mostly a thing in a civilized society that consideres the well being of some animals as part of the responsibility of humans. In some other places, experimenting with animals is the least form of torture they are exposed to as they normally get preyed by scavengers and humans who eats them or even use them for sacrifices. The believe that all animals are subject to the wish of the owner is still predominant in most part of the world and for most people, as long as you're the owner, you can choose to do to your animal whatever you think it's best to be done to it and if it's qualified to be used for an experimental purpose, it's even a plus to the worth of the animal.

Subjecting animals to torture is inhumane for me regardless of the process of the experiment but if through the outcome of the experiment, The results could help humans or other animals, death is death and iether way, they will eventually be preyed on and uselesed by another predator who lacks the ability of using them for the right purpose hence, experimenting with animals ought not be illegal.

we now have human/animal rights
try not to use examples of stories you read from history(pre rights) to debate todays reasons.
things done in the past are not the same as situations today and so referencing the past is moot..
standards today are nothing like the past so why mention the past.. its the past, you were not alive during that era to experience it. its not relevant today

its like this
did you know cavemen used to club their wives to death if the wives cheated.. but today we have divorce..
dont compare the pain and stress of divorce now to the caveman days, to argue that divorce is bad and is a painful event for those involved.. yes divorce is painful and emotional but not to the same standard as history of how people separate
killing your wife today for cheating is not an acceptable standard, its a crime

I am not against using animals for experiments as long as the animal doesn't suffer from excruciating pains caused by the operation. You shouldn't be cruel or torture animals because you want to experiment. This research should maintain the highest research or experiment standards. They shouldn't be careless about the process because they are just animals, thereby using more animals than required. 

You are even talking about animals, it is on record that some researchers used humans forcefully for their experiments. The stories of how African slaves were brutally used for experiments by developed nations bring so much sorrow and pain to my heart. These slaves were dissected alive for research purposes. Others were used for drug tests and were made to suffer terrible effects.         

let me touch on the touchy subject many are too afraid to say outloud

alot of woke idiots are stuck in their childish colouring book fantasy/social media scripts of thinking that rabbits in wild are happy free living bunnies that live on green pastures, eating carrots and talking to their bunny friends... where domestication is the vile horrific life.. well here is your wake up call

[trigger warning, get a vegan/recycled tissue ready]
rabbits in the world are prey, everyday they are chased by predators like foxes, wolves and even birds of prey. rabbits get infections and injuries and usually end up dying in horrific SLOW painful deaths by disease or injury where they are ripped apart savagely whilst still alive by predators... they dont die peacefully of old age surrounded by bunny friends in the wild
 yep sorry folks rabbits and other similar animals dont have the peaceful heavenly life in the wild you are taught in childrens books.. the books lied to you

now then when you look at domestication which does come with certain animals rights standards, does actually care for the animals and when in pain(lesser than being ripped apart by a wolf) they are euthanised humanely

..
too many woke animal rights advocates dont actually care about the short-long term well being of a domestically reared animal compared to an animals wildlife/feral counterpart.. infact they forget that when raised domestically they get vet checkups, medicines and their breeding is controlled by separating the genders and controlling breeding..
unlike their feral counterpart where if all animals were left to be feral the woke people will notice how their feral animal pals would overpopulate and start raiding the vegan vegetable fields destroying crops and suddenly the vegan woke army will be desiring to cull the same animals they pretend to love

so woke people, wake up to the feral reality of the predator-prey circle of life, wake up to how feral animals actually and realistically experience real world life and death in the wild.. then realise using animals domestically is not as bad as the bunny vs wolf scenario

because we all know if all the wokies were to get what they pretend to wish for due to social media scripting, not long after they will be calling for a culling as they suddenly see euthanasia via needle or gunshot is far more humane than the sharp claws, teeth or infections from natural predators

A sensitive topic and I think I slightly disagree with your instance on how animals would be treated. I am against of the suffering of animals and people for the sake of scientific advance, it is cruel to assume the life of a single individual is suitable to be sacrificed for the well-being of others of the same species. If anything, those experiments would be secure enough for them to be considered to be non-lethal.
In the case of meat consumptions, usually butchers are required by law to inflict death as painless and humane as possible to livestock, there are very norms about it in developed countries, otherwise it would be considered to be animal abuse.

It is kind of scary and depressing to realize much of the medical advance and product development we see today in the world could have come to reality because of the suffering of anonymous animals and people.

If an animal is your property, you have authority over it. If you are not the property of a government, you don't have to obey the laws of a government. However...

We are all the property of God. And God tells us in the Old Testament to treat our animal-property with justice and mercy. You can find this info in the Torah, the first 5 books of the Bible.

How deep does this go? Consider that we all have microbes and parasites that might be considered to be our property. Some of these are beneficial to the lives of our bodies. Others are not. But we don't even think of how badly we are treating many kinds of them by killing them off with antibiotics.

The point is that we should be good to our animal property. But we are the authority. And if we have agreed to be 'owned' by a government, then obey the agreement by doing what our government owner tells us to do.

In the US, we are only 'owned' by the government by unwittingly becoming 13th/14th Amendment slaves. We don't have to remain this way. And we don't have to continue to let government consider that we are this way. But it means that we have to start taking responsibility for our lives rather than attempting to leach off government.