So if a person joins to a scammer knowing that the employer is a scammer, may by the person is scammer as well?
Most of them are just a bunch of spammers that try to jump into any [literally] campaign that offers them to get their hands on a few pennies... 
Topic: Should participants by tagged if BM tagged? - page 2. (Read 460 times)
In addition to above comments:
Should we not check the project being promoted first before looking at the trust of the BM? It would be unfair to tag campaign participants run by a red-tagged BM when the project turns out to be legit. I'm not part of DT, just sharing my view.
First question is tagged for what ? After implemented new trust network, if someone just have red tag doesn't prove he/she is scammer. It would be more better to express opinions if you can point specific bounty manager. If MB tagged for scam someone then should avoid him. There would be more reason for tag, like "promote ponzi scheme" and also you should check ranks and reputation as well. I know some manager have red tag for promote ponzi scheme, but he have been managing btc signature campaign from years and paying regularly. So you may join belongs to such as managers. But us someone tagged because of likely scam project and he/she is managing same project then you should not join and likely you will get tag on such as case, for example obvious ponzi scheme. So it should be decide case by case, not average.
My question for DT1 and DT2: what do you think about participants who join the campaign if they see that the BM is tagged?
My opinion: the red trust is synonym: "seems this user is a scammer".
So if a person joins to a scammer knowing that the employer is a scammer, may by the person is scammer as well?
My opinion: the red trust is synonym: "seems this user is a scammer".
So if a person joins to a scammer knowing that the employer is a scammer, may by the person is scammer as well?
Jump to: