Pages:
Author

Topic: Should projects that knowingly employ proven untrustworthy individuals be viewed - page 2. (Read 484 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
Yes, I'm strongly inclined to tag anyone who knowingly hires frauds/scammers - although each case would have to be reviewed independently. e.g. a BH accepting a translator which was already tagged as fraudulent.
I am pleased to hear you say that Lauda.
I forgot to say that I did not vote because I don't agree with the biased reasoning on either option. The poll should not have any 'because' but rather 'Yes vs. No' and let people elaborate themselves.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
Yes, I'm strongly inclined to tag anyone who knowingly hires frauds/scammers - although each case would have to be reviewed independently. e.g. a BH accepting a translator which was already tagged as fraudulent.

I am pleased to hear you say that Lauda.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
Yes, I'm strongly inclined to tag anyone who knowingly hires frauds/scammers - although each case would have to be reviewed independently. e.g. a BH accepting a translator which was already tagged as fraudulent.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
I know we like to usually look at things the other way around for example

If someone knowingly promotes or supports a scam or untrustworthy project we will term those persons untrustworthy and scam supporters.

However what if project willingly is employing or supporting individuals that are PROVEN untrustworthy and dishonest or even perhaps prior scammers??

Should then we class them as untrustworthy projects and therefore risky and dangerous to become involved with and perhaps even our duty as honest members to alert other members to this danger?

Can you not only vote but can answer and provide full reasoning behind your reply.

Let's not discuss individual cases here.
Pages:
Jump to: