Should SatoshiRoulette.com add PPC support

SRoulette

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 252

Quote from: El Cabron on October 19, 2012, 02:18:45 AM

Quote from: SRoulette on October 19, 2012, 01:07:55 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:38:13 PM

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess

Seems like a scam to me.

I do not at all like dishonest people.

I think your English skills fail you Chaang.
You are mis-using the definition of scam and I am nor am or have been dishonest.
I have reverted it back the polls to avoid further confusing you.

What you fail to appreciate is the no votes have no bearing on the decision because key members of the PPC community contacted me specifically requesting addition.
You and others voting no had no influence on the decision made, the only votes we were interested in is Yes votes, hence 1 no and 2 joke polls.

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SRoulette on October 19, 2012, 01:07:55 AM

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:38:13 PM

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess

Seems like a scam to me.

I do not at all like dishonest people.

SRoulette

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 252

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:38:13 PM

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SRoulette on October 18, 2012, 09:37:34 PM

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.

But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.

No == Yes of Course Wink

Quote from: Este Nuno on October 18, 2012, 02:11:01 PM

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine.
So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.

Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee Cheesy

We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.

Quote from: smoothie on October 18, 2012, 06:27:23 PM

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

Proof == Yes we did Tongue

We changed no votes to a 2nd yes.

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

SRoulette

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 252

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.

But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.

No == Yes of Course Wink

Quote from: Este Nuno on October 18, 2012, 02:11:01 PM

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine.
So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.

Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee Cheesy

We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.

Quote from: smoothie on October 18, 2012, 06:27:23 PM

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

Proof == Yes we did Tongue

We changed no votes to a 2nd yes.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

Este Nuno

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

amarha

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: El Cabron on October 18, 2012, 11:40:02 AM

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Sure looks like it ... Roll Eyes

El Cabron

vip

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Liquid

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Crypto Somnium

i will help test

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

I wouldn't support anything that even reminds me of RealSolidShit ...AKA Sunny Drag Queen. Cheesy

SRoulette

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 252

crazy_rabbit

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1002

RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME

personally I hope not, but what the heck.

AndyRossy

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

SRoulette

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 252

dreamwatcher

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SRoulette on October 12, 2012, 12:16:39 AM

Quote from: dreamwatcher on October 11, 2012, 03:20:43 PM

Dammit, this was on my TODO list Cry

Oh well, guess I really would not have the time considering the project I am working on now for PPC.

I always liked the Roulette game and Dice is just a classic. I would say start with those two.

I would say bet ranges should be the PPC value equivalent of BTC bet ranges.

What project are you working on out of interest ?

Everything about my current PPC projects will be in this thread for now:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/locked-ppc-block-explorer-please-use-the-new-cryptocoinexplorer-thread-112972

Once the GUI client hits a stage where it can be beta tested, I will create a new thread for it.

AndyRossy

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: SRoulette on October 12, 2012, 01:37:11 PM

Code Monkey:

Quote

unfortunately the current version of ppcoind does not support the rpc command getrawtranasction

As has been explained to me, with that feature missing we cannot support ppcoin at this time with our engine, but we now have games and ppcoins ready for when it is supported.

Hi

Here's a patch for getrawtransaction.

Next release will be forked from bitcoin 0.7.0 as I understand so no patch will be required.

Andy

Code:

diff --git a/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp b/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp
index 3c39a30..adaedae 100644
--- a/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp
+++ b/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
-#include
+#include
#include
typedef boost::asio::ssl::stream SSLStream;

@@ -113,6 +113,33 @@ HexBits(unsigned int nBits)
return HexStr(BEGIN(uBits.cBits), END(uBits.cBits));
}

+void ScriptPubKeyToJSON(const CScript& scriptPubKey, Object& out)
+{
+ txnouttype type;
+ //vector addresses;
+ vector addresses;
+ int nRequired;
+
+ out.push_back(Pair("asm", scriptPubKey.ToString()));
+ out.push_back(Pair("hex", HexStr(scriptPubKey.begin(), scriptPubKey.end())));
+
+ ExtractAddresses(scriptPubKey, type, addresses, nRequired);
+ /**if (!ExtractDestinations(scriptPubKey, type, addresses, nRequired))
+ {
+ out.push_back(Pair("type", GetTxnOutputType(TX_NONSTANDARD)));
+ return;
+ }**/
+
+ out.push_back(Pair("reqSigs", nRequired));
+ out.push_back(Pair("type", GetTxnOutputType(type)));
+
+ Array a;
+ BOOST_FOREACH(const CBitcoinAddress& addr, addresses)
+ a.push_back(addr.ToString());
+ out.push_back(Pair("addresses", a));
+
+}
+
void WalletTxToJSON(const CWalletTx& wtx, Object& entry)
{
int confirms = wtx.GetDepthInMainChain();
@@ -172,6 +199,63 @@ Object blockToJSON(const CBlock& block, const CBlockIndex* blockindex, bool fPri
return result;
}

+void TxToJSON(const CTransaction& tx, const uint256 hashBlock, Object& entry)
+{
+ entry.push_back(Pair("txid", tx.GetHash().GetHex()));
+ entry.push_back(Pair("version", tx.nVersion));
+ entry.push_back(Pair("locktime", (boost::int64_t)tx.nLockTime));
+ Array vin;
+ BOOST_FOREACH(const CTxIn& txin, tx.vin)
+ {
+ Object in;
+ if (tx.IsCoinBase())
+ in.push_back(Pair("coinbase", HexStr(txin.scriptSig.begin(), txin.scriptSig.end())));
+ else
+ {
+ in.push_back(Pair("txid", txin.prevout.hash.GetHex()));
+ in.push_back(Pair("vout", (boost::int64_t)txin.prevout.n));
+ Object o;
+ o.push_back(Pair("asm", txin.scriptSig.ToString()));
+ o.push_back(Pair("hex", HexStr(txin.scriptSig.begin(), txin.scriptSig.end())));
+ in.push_back(Pair("scriptSig", o));
+ }
+ in.push_back(Pair("sequence", (boost::int64_t)txin.nSequence));
+ vin.push_back(in);
+ }
+ entry.push_back(Pair("vin", vin));
+ Array vout;
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < tx.vout.size(); i++)
+ {
+ const CTxOut& txout = tx.vout[i];
+ Object out;
+ out.push_back(Pair("value", ValueFromAmount(txout.nValue)));
+ out.push_back(Pair("n", (boost::int64_t)i));
+ Object o;
+ ScriptPubKeyToJSON(txout.scriptPubKey, o);
+ out.push_back(Pair("scriptPubKey", o));
+ vout.push_back(out);
+ }
+ entry.push_back(Pair("vout", vout));
+
+ if (hashBlock != 0)
+ {
+ entry.push_back(Pair("blockhash", hashBlock.GetHex()));
+ map::iterator mi = mapBlockIndex.find(hashBlock);
+ if (mi != mapBlockIndex.end() && (*mi).second)
+ {
+ CBlockIndex* pindex = (*mi).second;
+ if (pindex->IsInMainChain())
+ {
+ entry.push_back(Pair("confirmations", 1 + nBestHeight - pindex->nHeight));
+ entry.push_back(Pair("time", (boost::int64_t)pindex->nTime));
+ entry.push_back(Pair("blocktime", (boost::int64_t)pindex->nTime));
+ }
+ else
+ entry.push_back(Pair("confirmations", 0));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+

///
@@ -425,6 +509,133 @@ Value getnewaddress(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
}

+Value getrawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp) {
+ if (fHelp || params.size() < 1 || params.size() > 2)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "getrawtransaction [verbose=0]\n"
+ "If verbose=0, returns a string that is "
+ "serialized, hex-encoded data for . "
+ "If verbose is non-zero, returns an Object "
+ "with information about .");
+
+ uint256 hash;
+ hash.SetHex(params[0].get_str());
+ bool fVerbose = false;
+ if (params.size() > 1) fVerbose = (params[1].get_int() != 0);
+
+ CTransaction tx;
+ uint256 hashBlock = 0; //Block which contained the tx.
+ if (!GetTransaction(hash, tx, hashBlock))
+ throw JSONRPCError(-5, "No information available about transaction");
+
+ CDataStream ssTx(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ ssTx << tx;
+ string strHex = HexStr(ssTx.begin(), ssTx.end());
+
+ if (!fVerbose)
+ return strHex;
+
+ Object result;
+ result.push_back(Pair("hex", strHex));
+ //TxToJSON(tx, hashBlock, result);
+ return result;
+}
+
+Value listunspent(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
+{
+ if (fHelp || params.size() > 3)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "listunspent [minconf=1] [maxconf=9999999] [\"address\",...]\n"
+ "Returns array of unspent transaction outputs\n"
+ "with between minconf and maxconf (inclusive) confirmations.\n"
+ "Optionally filtered to only include txouts paid to specified addresses.\n"
+ "Results are an array of Objects, each of which has:\n"
+ "{txid, vout, scriptPubKey, amount, confirmations}");
+
+ Object result;
+ return result;
+}
+
+Value createrawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
+{
+ if (fHelp || params.size() != 2)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "createrawtransaction [{\"txid\":txid,\"vout\":n},...] {address:amount,...}\n"
+ "Create a transaction spending given inputs\n"
+ "(array of objects containing transaction id and output number),\n"
+ "sending to given address(es).\n"
+ "Returns hex-encoded raw transaction.\n"
+ "Note that the transaction's inputs are not signed, and\n"
+ "it is not stored in the wallet or transmitted to the network.");
+
+ Object result;
+ return result;
+}
+
+Value signrawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
+{
+ if (fHelp || params.size() < 1 || params.size() > 4)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "signrawtransaction [{\"txid\":txid,\"vout\":n,\"scriptPubKey\":hex},...] [,...] [sighashtype=\"ALL\"]\n"
+ "Sign inputs for raw transaction (serialized, hex-encoded).\n"
+ "Second optional argument (may be null) is an array of previous transaction outputs that\n"
+ "this transaction depends on but may not yet be in the blockchain.\n"
+ "Third optional argument (may be null) is an array of base58-encoded private\n"
+ "keys that, if given, will be the only keys used to sign the transaction.\n"
+ "Fourth optional argument is a string that is one of six values; ALL, NONE, SINGLE or\n"
+ "ALL|ANYONECANPAY, NONE|ANYONECANPAY, SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY.\n"
+ "Returns json object with keys:\n"
+ " hex : raw transaction with signature(s) (hex-encoded string)\n"
+ " complete : 1 if transaction has a complete set of signature (0 if not)"
+ "UPDATE ME");
+
+
+ Object result;
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+Value sendrawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
+{
+ if (fHelp || params.size() < 1 || params.size() > 1)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "sendrawtransaction \n"
+ "Submits raw transaction (serialized, hex-encoded) to local node and network.");
+ Object result;
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+Value decoderawtransaction(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
+{
+ if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
+ throw runtime_error(
+ "decoderawtransaction \n"
+ "Return a JSON object representing the serialized, hex-encoded transaction.");
+ //RPCTypeCheck(params, list_of(str_type));
+
+ vector txData(ParseHex(params[0].get_str()));
+ CDataStream ssData(txData, SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
+ CTransaction tx;
+ try {
+ ssData >> tx;
+ }
+ catch (std::exception &e) {
+ throw JSONRPCError(-22, "TX decode failed");
+ }
+
+ Object result;
+ TxToJSON(tx, 0, result);
+
+ return result;
+
+
+}
+
+
+
+
+
CBitcoinAddress GetAccountAddress(string strAccount, bool bForceNew=false)
{
CWalletDB walletdb(pwalletMain->strWalletFile);
@@ -976,7 +1187,7 @@ Value sendmany(const Array& params, bool fHelp)

CScript scriptPubKey;
scriptPubKey.SetBitcoinAddress(address);
- int64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(s.value_);
+ int64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(s.value_);
if (nAmount < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
throw JSONRPCError(-101, "Send amount too small");
totalAmount += nAmount;
@@ -1361,7 +1572,7 @@ Value listtransactions(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
if (ret.size() >= (nCount+nFrom)) break;
}
// ret is newest to oldest
-
+
if (nFrom > (int)ret.size())
nFrom = ret.size();
if ((nFrom + nCount) > (int)ret.size())
@@ -2043,9 +2254,9 @@ Value getcheckpoint(const Array& params, bool fHelp)

Object result;
CBlockIndex* pindexCheckpoint;
-
+
result.push_back(Pair("synccheckpoint", Checkpoints::hashSyncCheckpoint.ToString().c_str()));
- pindexCheckpoint = mapBlockIndex[Checkpoints::hashSyncCheckpoint];
+ pindexCheckpoint = mapBlockIndex[Checkpoints::hashSyncCheckpoint];
result.push_back(Pair("height", pindexCheckpoint->nHeight));
result.push_back(Pair("timestamp", DateTimeStrFormat(pindexCheckpoint->GetBlockTime()).c_str()));
if (mapArgs.count("-checkpointkey"))
@@ -2154,7 +2365,7 @@ Value makekeypair(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
string strPrefix = "";
if (params.size() > 0)
strPrefix = params[0].get_str();
-
+
CKey key;
int nCount = 0;
do
@@ -2176,7 +2387,7 @@ Value makekeypair(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
extern CCriticalSection cs_mapAlerts;
extern map mapAlerts;

-// ppcoin: send alert.
+// ppcoin: send alert.
// There is a known deadlock situation with ThreadMessageHandler
// ThreadMessageHandler: holds cs_vSend and acquiring cs_main in SendMessages()
// ThreadRPCServer: holds cs_main and acquiring cs_vSend in alert.RelayTo()/PushMessage()/BeginMessage()
@@ -2211,13 +2422,13 @@ Value sendalert(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
CDataStream sMsg(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
sMsg << (CUnsignedAlert)alert;
alert.vchMsg = vector(sMsg.begin(), sMsg.end());
-
+
vector vchPrivKey = ParseHex(params[1].get_str());
key.SetPrivKey(CPrivKey(vchPrivKey.begin(), vchPrivKey.end())); // if key is not correct openssl may crash
if (!key.Sign(Hash(alert.vchMsg.begin(), alert.vchMsg.end()), alert.vchSig))
throw runtime_error(
- "Unable to sign alert, check private key?\n");
- if(!alert.ProcessAlert())
+ "Unable to sign alert, check private key?\n");
+ if(!alert.ProcessAlert())
throw runtime_error(
"Failed to process alert.\n");
// Relay alert
@@ -2301,6 +2512,12 @@ static const CRPCCommand vRPCCommands[] =
{ "repairwallet", &repairwallet, false},
{ "makekeypair", &makekeypair, false},
{ "sendalert", &sendalert, false},
+ { "getrawtransaction", &getrawtransaction, false},
+ { "listunspent", &listunspent, false},
+ { "createrawtransaction", &createrawtransaction, false},
+ { "signrawtransaction", &signrawtransaction, false},
+ { "sendrawtransaction", &sendrawtransaction, false},
+ { "decoderawtransaction", &decoderawtransaction, false},
};

CRPCTable::CRPCTable()
@@ -2849,15 +3066,19 @@ Object CallRPC(const string& strMethod, const Array& params)

template
-void ConvertTo(Value& value)
+void ConvertTo(Value& value, bool fAllowNull=false)
{
+ if (fAllowNull && value.type() == null_type)
+ return;
if (value.type() == str_type)
{
// reinterpret string as unquoted json value
Value value2;
- if (!read_string(value.get_str(), value2))
- throw runtime_error("type mismatch");
- value = value2.get_value();
+ string strJSON = value.get_str();
+ if (!read_string(strJSON, value2))
+ throw runtime_error(string("Error parsing JSON:")+strJSON);
+ ConvertTo(value2, fAllowNull);
+ value = value2;
}
else
{
@@ -2940,6 +3161,15 @@ int CommandLineRPC(int argc, char *argv[])
throw runtime_error("type mismatch "+s);
params[1] = v.get_array();
}
+ if (strMethod == "listunspent" && n > 0) ConvertTo(params[0]);
+ if (strMethod == "listunspent" && n > 1) ConvertTo(params[1]);
+ if (strMethod == "listunspent" && n > 2) ConvertTo(params[2]);
+ if (strMethod == "getrawtransaction" && n > 1) ConvertTo(params[1]);
+ if (strMethod == "createrawtransaction" && n > 0) ConvertTo(params[0]);
+ if (strMethod == "createrawtransaction" && n > 1) ConvertTo

Topic: Should SatoshiRoulette.com add PPC support (Read 2979 times)