It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency,
since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site;
Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in -
your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency
so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...
Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess
Seems like a scam to me.
I do not at all like dishonest people.
I think your English skills fail you Chaang. You are mis-using the definition of scam and I am nor am or have been dishonest. I have reverted it back the polls to avoid further confusing you.
What you fail to appreciate is the no votes have no bearing on the decision because key members of the PPC community contacted me specifically requesting addition. You and others voting no had no influence on the decision made, the only votes we were interested in is Yes votes, hence 1 no and 2 joke polls.
you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?
We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.
But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.
Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?
I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.
You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.
I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.
Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.
Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine. So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.
Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee
We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.
you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?
We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.
But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.
Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?
I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.
You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.
I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.
Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.
Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine. So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.
Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee
We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.
Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?
I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.
You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.
I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.
Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.
unfortunately the current version of ppcoind does not support the rpc command getrawtranasction
As has been explained to me, with that feature missing we cannot support ppcoin at this time with our engine, but we now have games and ppcoins ready for when it is supported.
Hi
Here's a patch for getrawtransaction.
Next release will be forked from bitcoin 0.7.0 as I understand so no patch will be required.
unfortunately the current version of ppcoind does not support the rpc command getrawtranasction
As has been explained to me, with that feature missing we cannot support ppcoin at this time with our engine, but we now have games and ppcoins ready for when it is supported.
I hope no one votes for namecoin. I actually LIKE namecoin, but I don't think it should be used like any old currency. I believe that people using it as currency is part of the reason it is failing as a datastore system.