Topic: Should we ban nuclear weapons? - page 2. (Read 313 times)
shouldn't, nuclear weapons is powerful. We need nuclear to nuke bad country.
Kalau menurut saya sangat harus.karna dengan menggunakan macam itu akan menimbulkan kerusakan dahsyat
In a perfect world yes, but politics of the world pretty much makes that impossible. How could you possible get everyone to agree/comply?
No, USA need to keep it to maintenance the peace of our world.
Please shed more light on your reasoning. I am really interested to hear you views in details.
Why do you say that? Does world peace lie in the hands of the USA?
And who gave it the mandate that it should be the main player in maintaining world peace?
Does this mean that the UN and other well recognized institutions are somewhat irrelevant in their mandate if world peace sorely depends on the USA?
it's the right when we should and we have to ban nuclear weapons but can we ?? the government can accept the listen instead of talking about country protect stuff ?.I don't think so.
You right, it seems impossible to ban nuclear weapons but we have to do something because i think someday nuclear will explore it.
it's the right when we should and we have to ban nuclear weapons but can we ?? the government can accept the listen instead of talking about country protect stuff ?.I don't think so.
Yes, you need, cause the nearest war can be the last war of the hole world!
Yes, sure. Nuclear weapons should be banned. But, alas, it may never happen because of world politics.
As we know that nuclear is a very dangerous weapon so it should not be necessary.
For the todays state it will be real disaster when any war happens
No, USA need to keep it to maintenance the peace of our world.
That is a good think to do to save mankind because if a war happen using nuclear weapons that will be a disaster
They should be banned ..they pose untold threat to human existence. ....nuclear weapon is the greatest threat to humanity
Would say yes, but how are we going to accomplish that and maintain that situation. The knowledge of how-to built them will not disappear...
On top of that, how will anybody enforce this ban, without having a power imbalance, which makes banning them redundant all together (e.g. Country A threatening Country B not to make nukes or they will be nuked...?)
On top of that, how will anybody enforce this ban, without having a power imbalance, which makes banning them redundant all together (e.g. Country A threatening Country B not to make nukes or they will be nuked...?)
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
Unfortunately NW is not like a forum's thread to be banned easily.
They are trying http://www.icanw.org/
I wish they weren't invented in the first place. They pose too much threat to humanity.
Yes we should because it is too much dangerous to posses or to use by any country in the world and no good can come out of it at the end
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
I completely share your opinion. Nuclear energy should be used for peaceful purposes. All countries of the world should abandon nuclear weapons. Now humanity has reached such a level of development that the global challenge to security is not even the use of weapons, but the very fact of its availability. The Manhattan project was a very big mistake. History proves that people very often use the achievements of technical progress not to benefit the civilian population, but to the detriment. The Chernobyl disaster proves that people do not know how to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes too. And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
Jump to: