Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 17.

SimpeleSimpele

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

i think is good if bounty campaign use limit participant
because bounty campaign participant can get good payment
but promote can't masive if use limit participant

IvsI

full member

Activity: 280

Merit: 101

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?

(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…
yes we should limit, but whos will ask me )

nguyenkhanhhung14

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 14

Marketplace for sensor data

Most of the time, every bounty campaign wants to have many members join their bounty to promote as many places as possible. If there are many members involved, the project will be well-known and attracted investment capital for the project. So limiting the number of bounty participants is a thought that is not feasible, because very few ICO projects limit the number of members unless their marketing budget is too small.

kingvirtus09

full member

Activity: 938

Merit: 108

OrangeFren.com

Yes I hope that thet will limit the participants, but it will depends on the bounty manager or who is handling the campaign. Some bounty project practice this system.

sandor111

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: mitsarasss on April 07, 2018, 02:15:59 PM

As bounty hunter I think that limits are good for us, cause we can get more distribution not this low cost tokens in every bounty.

Live and let live. Why setting limits where they are not necessary. This kind of limits would mean just less freedom for projects who want many participants. It is up to each bounty hunter that he chooses campaign. I always take into account how many participants are already there and how many I expect to join after me. Then I calculate how many tokens I expect to get, for example 1.5% of bounty allocation.

Valermos

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 100

Some people start and then stop posting and working in bounty, so it is not a good thing to limit the participants, you can not regulate the qty of people who stop work.

hovrah

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Quote from: megaqueen777 on April 08, 2018, 11:38:39 AM

Yes, I think so. Too many participants, more spams and the less rewards we get in every bounty. I guess bounty managers should limit the number of the participants and it should be in the first come, first in basis.

I also do not understand why they do not make such restrictions. The fact is that the ico company is quite a lot and each produces a Bounty company. Therefore, there are many people where everyone can participate. Therefore, limiting the number of participants will not bring certain harm to the same participant. At least even earnings will be higher.

megaqueen777

newbie

Activity: 104

Merit: 0

Yes, I think so. Too many participants, more spams and the less rewards we get in every bounty. I guess bounty managers should limit the number of the participants and it should be in the first come, first in basis.

ItsZeroLimit

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 17

On social networks, the lowest percentage of the campaign bounty is allocated, because of that, bounty hunters get a penny. It is necessary to find out whose advertising activity gives the best result. Social networks, or, for example, in video blogs.

ryzaadit

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 1261

Quote from: zwiggel on April 08, 2018, 09:56:57 AM

In my opinion, we do not necessarily limit our members to participating in campaigns. Anyone can participate in the important thing is the article of the people, the right topic and guaranteed time according to regulations and the manager scores high, he wins and receives bonuses.

Limit member campaign its a good decision for the Bounty Hunter do you want to know the reason ? with limited the participant can make the reward stay high for the participant. So you will receive a good reward for your effort. Without limit, you can be received 10$ for work 2-3 month.

ityandsyn

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 11

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Well regarding to the number of participants in a campaign is depending on the rules of managers, weather it needs no limits for the number of heads or it is limited up to particular number, and with regards to the payments and bonuses is it's our decision if we want to stay or leave the crowd.

Katabit

member

Activity: 203

Merit: 11

ENTRY cryptocurrency

For developers, it is very important that as many people as possible own a token. If most tokens are owned by several whales, then such a project will be too succumb to speculation and will depend very heavily on these whales. As a bounty hunter, I certainly would like to get paid for work more. But this is already a matter of the project developers' greed and not otherwise.

zwiggel

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 250

In my opinion, we do not necessarily limit our members to participating in campaigns. Anyone can participate in the important thing is the article of the people, the right topic and guaranteed time according to regulations and the manager scores high, he wins and receives bonuses.

bluecoinX

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 11

Borderless for the People, Frictionless for the Ba

In a campaign, it is usually easier to get involved, and the easier it is to go up, the more people will participate in it. I don't think there is much need to play too much, and the patience is limited.

Dasha88fed

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 10

Quote from: hoangvuthach on April 07, 2018, 05:24:15 AM

Unlikely, the more people are involved, the more spam on the social networks and that is what they want, their ico will be for many people. The purpose of bounty is to makerting and the more participants they promote success

Yes, it is beneficial for the creators of the project to have a lot of participants in their bounty campaign, but for those who participate in the bounty, a large number of participants is not profitable at all, because the common pool is divided into all and the more participants, the less the reward for the work. Recently, a friend of mine showed that he was credited with tokens for $5 for 6 weeks of work in the facebook bounty campaign and all because there were a lot of participants.

lienfaye

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 629

Quote from: napsterz on April 08, 2018, 06:53:42 AM

I think this is a good suggestion. If too many participants join the incentive will be divided until it is not that significant to contribute anymore. So the team also needs to set a reasonable amount of participants to balance the equation.

Well that's right but having more participants to advertise their project is an advantage for them to expand the popularity and be known to many, thats how it is and we cant change that rules unless the team behind it implement some changes. Its true that we cant earn huge amount of money by joining in bounty campaigns but its better than nothing at all.

Artem57

jr. member

Activity: 232

Merit: 2

A nexgen decentralized ride hailing

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

100% sure that all the bounty of the company should limit the number of its participants to ensure that everyone could earn decent money. For example in Facebook and Twitter I would do up to 500 participants, and the forum in the company signature not more than 200 participants per company. Therefore, all participants will be able to get good money for his work in the bounty of the company.

napsterz

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 10

The Intelligent Retail Currency

I think this is a good suggestion. If too many participants join the incentive will be divided until it is not that significant to contribute anymore. So the team also needs to set a reasonable amount of participants to balance the equation.

BitindaHouse

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 10

I think companies that do this are allowed to invest in small investors, and on private pre-sales they already collected a large amount because of this they are considered very valuable

Claudyah

newbie

Activity: 252

Merit: 0

yes I think it should and it is very obligatory, limit some members to campaign and market the product, there are only some of the best people who can enter, avoid spam or poor quality postings, so that our product or signature is used by the selected people which has good post quality is not just spam

Topic: Should we limit members in one campaign? - page 17. (Read 1560 times)