It would take +20 coins to get even 1% of profits
Too much coins to invest for such low profit.
In other words high riskes and low profits
Topic: [SHUTTING DOWN] [DiceBitco.in | BE THE BANK ! | 1% House Edge] - page 84. (Read 102257 times)
August 13, 2014, 11:25:45 AM
It makes no sense for regular user to invest in this site becouse there is so much invested already
It would take +20 coins to get even 1% of profits
Too much coins to invest for such low profit.
In other words high riskes and low profits
It would take +20 coins to get even 1% of profits
Too much coins to invest for such low profit.
In other words high riskes and low profits
August 13, 2014, 09:08:02 AM
How about doog gets a key when the wallet it multisig? What would give a LOT of credibility to the site
August 13, 2014, 07:52:54 AM
Can I haz chat improvements nau?
You ASKED for it!!
"king dooglus" - has a certain ring to it I suppose
So does this mean we have a new mod? Like I said doog should be an unpaid admin
At least two...
August 12, 2014, 09:11:45 PM
Can I haz chat improvements nau?
You ASKED for it!!
"king dooglus" - has a certain ring to it I suppose
So does this mean we have a new mod? Like I said doog should be an unpaid admin
August 12, 2014, 06:56:56 PM
Can I haz chat improvements nau?
You ASKED for it!!
"king dooglus" - has a certain ring to it I suppose
August 12, 2014, 06:17:49 PM
Can I haz chat improvements nau?
You ASKED for it!!
August 12, 2014, 03:18:27 PM
1) give mods the ability to mute specific users
2) have a list of words which trigger a silent mute - so the spammer doesn't know they are muted
3) have the chat auto-ban for obvious things like repeating the same line over and over
2) have a list of words which trigger a silent mute - so the spammer doesn't know they are muted
3) have the chat auto-ban for obvious things like repeating the same line over and over
Right on cue, another asshole appears:
Can I haz chat improvements nau?
August 12, 2014, 02:30:13 PM
I agree, and it will be "fixed" in the next update
You can tell I'm running out of ideas (for things to complain about) when I have to resort to using my girlfriend for such 'soft' issues, eh?
Though you do need to do something about the chat spam. Last night it was full of someone spamming their affiliate links to other sites.
1) give mods the ability to mute specific users
2) have a list of words which trigger a silent mute - so the spammer doesn't know they are muted
3) have the chat auto-ban for obvious things like repeating the same line over and over
For 2), JD used this:
Code:
txt.match(/(:\/\/(?:www[.])?(?:btc-dice|dicenow)[.]com|leadnurture[.]com|g[^a-z]*r[^a-z]*i[^a-z]*n[^a-z]*d[^a-z]*a[^a-z]*b[^a-z]*i[^a-z]*t|ponzi[.]io|bitbandit|luckincrease[.]co|itchydice|vert-dice|sato-dice|kissdice|bitstardust|luckynumber|FairCryptoPumps|cubeminer|xbet[.]io|coinwin[.]us|dicebet|coredice|betabit|everydice|coinsurf[.]tk|whipplegames|adminbtc|b[^a-z]*[i1l][^a-z]*t[^a-z]*b[^a-z]*[1il][^a-z]*[a@][^a-z]*c[^a-z]*k[^a-z]*r[^a-z]*[3e][^a-z]*d|speedbet[.]net|freebitco[.,]in\/|bitcoinhorse[.]com|goldentowns[.]com|[email protected]|btc sell just-dice source|192[.]241[.]245[.]135|Choose Your Kelly|Choose Your Pool|ice-dice[.]com\/[a-z]*[?]i|satoshisroulette[.]com\/[a-z]|headsvstails|Hoseaxxx|PrimeDice_AUTOBET_BOT|1bgY4vz|LETS DICE [|] CLEAN DESIGN|I'm in a really dumpy situation and I'm homeless at the age of 18)/i)) {
It's a little out of date, since there are new sites being spammed now, but it's a good start.
August 12, 2014, 02:25:16 PM
But, what happens when gamblers start winning ? The Site Profit will show in -ve and investors will be discouraged !!!
Not sure if you were joking, but this is a non-issue..
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
.. and this is dead on.
I agree, and it will be "fixed" in the next update
August 12, 2014, 02:20:34 PM
But, what happens when gamblers start winning ? The Site Profit will show in -ve and investors will be discouraged !!!
Not sure if you were joking, but this is a non-issue..
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
.. and this is dead on.
August 12, 2014, 02:15:22 PM
But, what happens when gamblers start winning ? The Site Profit will show in -ve and investors will be discouraged !!! It can be kept in a logic I guess...
When Gamblers are winning => Bet Profit
When Gamblers are losing => Site Profit
When Gamblers are winning => Bet Profit
When Gamblers are losing => Site Profit
Investors know they're probably going to win in the end. Some even think that the site having a negative profit is good, because "the law of averages" means it'll win a lot soon.
Gamblers know they're going to lose in the end, but don't like to be reminded of it.
August 12, 2014, 01:48:41 PM
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Agreed. Telling gamblers others have lost X amount of bitcoins doesn't really encourage to play
But, what happens when gamblers start winning ? The Site Profit will show in -ve and investors will be discouraged !!! It can be kept in a logic I guess...
When Gamblers are winning => Bet Profit
When Gamblers are losing => Site Profit
True. But without players the investors won't earn anything.
Besides, investing is usually something you think about and thus you know the math is on your side in the long run.
August 12, 2014, 01:23:17 PM
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Agreed. Telling gamblers others have lost X amount of bitcoins doesn't really encourage to play
But, what happens when gamblers start winning ? The Site Profit will show in -ve and investors will be discouraged !!! It can be kept in a logic I guess...
When Gamblers are winning => Bet Profit
When Gamblers are losing => Site Profit
August 12, 2014, 12:46:49 PM
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
Agreed. Telling gamblers others have lost X amount of bitcoins doesn't really encourage to play
August 12, 2014, 12:34:50 PM
So who's the big loser? Groovie?
Finally we're moving in the right direction
Finally we're moving in the right direction
Groovie played a lot, but apparently ended up with 7 BTC profit.
I tried to screenshot his bets, but I was on my tablet at the time, my screenshots were at two different zoom levels, and I missed his first +5 bet. I've patched them together into an ugly single image, and made up the missing +5 by copy/pasting bits of other bets:
Also, Deb commented to me that showing "all bets profit" as -20 looks bad and will be off-putting to gamblers.
Better, she says, to show "site profit: 20".
I don't know if she's right, but she's usually pretty intuitive about such stuff.
August 12, 2014, 12:05:30 PM
So who's the big loser? Groovie?
Finally we're moving in the right direction
Finally we're moving in the right direction
August 12, 2014, 11:52:21 AM
This site is getting scary successful. Nearly 3000 BTC invested and nearly 5000 BTC wagered.
August 12, 2014, 11:50:18 AM
Sorry, did not get your point !!! 5 Million what ?
Bets. They now have over 5 Million bets on their website, which is amazing for a relatively new website. 
its actually over 6 million allready, but I wasnt online at that time. If I am not mistaken thats >1 million bets in < 24 hours.
August 12, 2014, 10:22:00 AM
Sorry, did not get your point !!! 5 Million what ?
Bets. They now have over 5 Million bets on their website, which is amazing for a relatively new website. August 12, 2014, 10:19:24 AM
Yes, 5 Million.
Sorry, did not get your point !!! 5 Million what ?
Jump to: